26 U.S.C. § 9031

Short title

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be cited as the “Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act”.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2024 · leading case: Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994). · cites it 2× “(Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act), 26 U. S. C. § 9031 et seq. (Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act).”
Vote Choice, Inc. v. Di Stefano, 814 F. Supp. 195 (D.R.I. 1993). “§ 17-25-19 with 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq. Under the presidential primary scheme, in return for complying with expenditure limits, qualifying presidential candidates receive federal matching funds for the first $250 they receive from each contributor, up to one half of the…”
Green Party of CT v. Garfield, 537 F. Supp. 2d 359 (D. Conn. 2008). “26 U.S.C. §§ 9031 , et seq. To be eligible for primary funds, a participating candidate must raise at least 5,000 dollars in each of 20 states in increments of 250 dollars or less per person, and must agree to abide by expenditure limitations.”
United States v. Jackson, 433 F. Supp. 239 (W.D.N.Y. 1977). · cites it 2× “JACKSON, knowingly and wilfully did furnish false, fictitious, and fraudulent evidence and information to the Federal Election Commission, relevant to certification by the Federal Election Commission for his eligibility to receive Presidential Primary Election Matching Fund…”
Spannaus v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 641 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). “Defendant FEC is the agency of the federal government charged with the administration and civil enforcement of the Act and of the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended ( 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq.) (“the Matching Fund Act”).”
Buckley v. Valeo, 387 F. Supp. 135 (D.D.C. 1975). “1297 , 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq. The 1974 Amendments substituted “Federal Election Commission” for “Comptroller General” in 26 U.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Larouche Campaign, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 120 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). “, (“the Act”) and the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq., (“the Matching Fund Act”).”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Automated Bus. Servs., 888 F. Supp. 539 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). “, and the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act (“the Matching Payment Act”), 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq. The Matching Payment Act provides for partial federal financing of the campaign of any presidential primary candidate who meets certain eligibility requirements.”
Hooker v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 92 F. Supp. 2d 740 (M.D. Tenn. 2000). “The plaintiff challenges two laws regarding campaign funds for the presidential and congressional elections — the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 , et seq., and the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, 26 U.”
Lyndon H. Larouche Larouche Democratic Campaign '88 v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 990 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “LaRouche and the LaRouche Democratic Campaign ’88 (“petitioners”) of the Commission’s “final determination” that petitioners must repay $151,259 obtained pursuant to the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9031 et seq. (“the Act”). The FEC’s letter…”
Carter-Mondale Reelection Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 642 F.2d 538 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “Several aspects of our decision in LaRouche are distinguishable because LaRouche involved federal funding of candidates under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq., whereas this case involves the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act,…”
Feinstein v. Carey, 532 F.2d 873 (2d Cir. 1976). “§ 1973aa-la and 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq. This is the sole basis for the plaintiffs’ claim.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.