27 U.S.C. § 201
Short title
This subchapter may be cited as the “Federal Alcohol Administration Act”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 70
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1938–2024 · leading case: Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly, 95 P.3d 422 (Cal. 2004).
Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly, 95 P.3d 422 (Cal. 2004). “As discussed more fully below, federal law, the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, or FAA Act ( 27 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.), enacted by Congress in 1935, bars misleading statements on wine labels (id.”
In re Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig., 644 F. App'x 515 (6th Cir. 2016). “977 (1935) (codified as amended at 27 U.S.C. §§ 201 -219a), which, among other things, authorized the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”) to eliminate “unfair competition” in the production and sale of alcoholic beverages.”
Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co., 514 U.S. 476 (1995). “977 , 27 U. S. C. § 201 et seq. , prohibited disclosure of the alcohol content of beer on labels or in advertising.”
Clayton Byrd v. Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'n, 883 F.3d 608 (6th Cir. 2018). “Federal Alcohol Administration Act, 27 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. But it leaves “transportation [and] importation .”
O'Hara v. Diageo-Guinness, USA, Inc., 306 F. Supp. 3d 441 (D.D.C. 2018). “The TTB Regulatory Framework The Federal Alcohol Administration Act (the "FAAA"), 27 U.S.C. §§ 201 - 219, regulates the sale of alcohol beverages, including beer, in interstate commerce.”
Atlas Brew Works, LLC v. Barr, 391 F. Supp. 3d 6 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Regulation of Alcohol Labels The Federal Alcohol Administration Act ("FAA Act"), 27 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. , regulates the content of labels affixed to malt beverages shipped in interstate commerce.”
Bellion Spirits, LLC v. United States, 7 F.4th 1201 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “See 27 U.S.C. §§ 201–219a. The Act requires product labels and advertisements for alcoholic beverages to comply with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury.”
Marine Wholesale & Warehouse Co. v. United States, 315 F. Supp. 3d 498 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “Code ("tobacco permit"), and basic permits for the importing and wholesaling of beverage alcohol, issued under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act ("FAAA"), 27 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. ("alcohol permits").”
Sociedad Anonima Viña Santa Rita v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, 193 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2001). “STATUTORY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Soon after the Twenty-first Amendment to the Constitution was ratified and the country’s experiment with prohibition ended, Congress enacted the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, 27 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FAA” or “Act”), which, among other…”
Bloor v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 454 F. Supp. 258 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “The authors considered payments made in cash to Emerson’s and certain of its employees in order to facilitate sales to be “questionable” under (1) The Alcohol Administration Act, 27 U.S.C. § 201 , et seq. (prohibiting commercial bribery and special considerations in the sale of…”
Adolph Coors Co., Cross-Appellant v. A & S Wholesalers, Inc., Cross-Appellee, 561 F.2d 807 (10th Cir. 1977). “The court also concluded that the alleged violations of the Colorado and federal licensing laws, even if attributable to A & S, do not provide Coors with any protection from the liability provisions of the Sherman Act, inasmuch as neither the Colorado Liquor Code nor the Federal…”
Lake Cnty. Beverage Co. v. 21st Amendment, Inc., 441 N.E.2d 1008 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982). “The National opinion is relevant because the court rejected the argument that the Robinson-Patman Act could be enforced through the provisions of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, 27 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., finding that the acts were separate and distinct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.