28 U.S.C. § 142
Repealed. Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 115(c)(3), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 32]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1927–2006 · leading case: Chandler v. Jud. Council of the Tenth Circuit, 398 U.S. 74 (1970).
Chandler v. Jud. Council of the Tenth Circuit, 398 U.S. 74 (1970). “§ 140 (a); to approve as necessary the provision of judicial accommodations for the courts by the General Services Administration, 28 U. S. C. § 142 ; to consent to the designation and assignment of circuit or district judges to sit on courts other than those for which they are…”
United States v. Alex J. Raineri, 670 F.2d 702 (7th Cir. 1982). “See 28 U.S.C. § 142 . 4 B. Jury Selection Defendant also argues that the Jury Selection Plan, under which his jury was selected, no longer complies with the Jury Selection and Service Act, 28 U.”
Patterson v. Morris, 337 B.R. 82 (E.D. La. 2006). “Despite this, plaintiffs aver that the Court must remand this matter under 28 U.S.C. § 142 (b) on equitable grounds or alternatively, apply permissive abstention under 28 U.”
Patrick Jobbing Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins., 21 F.2d 106 (W.D. Va. 1927). “In conclusion, it is worth noting that in • 21 sections of the Judicial Code (70, 71, 72,-77, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 88,' 89, 90, 91, 93, 99, 100,106,107,108,109,112 [28 USCA §§ 142, 144, 145, 150-152, 156, 157, 159, 168-171, 173, 180, 181, 187-190, 193]) the counties composing the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.