28 U.S.C. § 1445
Nonremovable actions
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 71 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 28, 36 Stat. 1094; Jan. 20, 1914, ch. 11, 38 Stat. 278; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, § 1, 45 Stat. 54).
The words “or its receivers or trustees” were inserted in both subsections to make clear that nonremovable actions against a carrier do not become removable under section 1442 of this title when filed against court receivers or trustees.
This was the unquestioned rule prior to the act of Aug. 23, 1916, ch. 399, 39 Stat. 532, amending section 76 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and permitting removal of actions against officers of United States courts. The cases are in conflict as to whether under that amendment the case becomes removable when the carrier is in receivership or undergoing reorganization. The revised section resolves the conflict by denying the right of removal to receivers and trustees where it would be nonexistent if the carrier were the party defendant. Thus the subject matter rather than legalistic distinctions as to the identity of the parties is made determinative consideration.
A reference in section 71 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., to sections 51–59 of title 45, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Railroads, was changed to “51–60.” Such sections 51–59 embraced all of chapter 2 of said title 45 when the law on which such section 71 is based was enacted, but a new section (60) was added in 1939.
Other provisions of section 71 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appear in section 1441 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Section 40302 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, referred to in subsec. (d), is section 40302 of title IV of Pub. L. 103–322, which is classified to section 12361 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–287 substituted “sections 1–4 and 5–10 of the Act of
1995—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–88 substituted “carrier” for “common carrier” and “11706 or 14706” for “11707”.
1994—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–322 added subsec. (d).
1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–486 substituted “$10,000” for “$3,000”.
Pub. L. 95–473 substituted “section 11707 of title 49” for “section 20 of Title 49”.
1958—Pub. L. 85–554 substituted “Nonremovable actions” for “Carriers; nonremovable actions” in section catchline and added subsec. (c).
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–287 effective
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective
Amendment by Pub. L. 85–554 applicable only in the case of actions commenced after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 619
cases (114 in the last 5 years), 1949–2026 · leading case: Brendan Holbein v. Baxter Chrysler Jeep, Inc., 983 F.3d 1049 (8th Cir. 2020).
Brendan Holbein v. Baxter Chrysler Jeep, Inc., 983 F.3d 1049 (8th Cir. 2020). “1915) (referring to the prohibition on removal now codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (a)). It exists to “preserve the plaintiff’s choice of a (state) forum, under circumstances where it is arguably less urgent to provide a federal forum to prevent prejudice.”
Dean Humphrey v. Sequentia, Inc., 58 F.3d 1238 (8th Cir. 1995). “Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the issue of whether removal was proper is now moot because plaintiff has since amended his complaint to include federal claims under the LMRA alleging violations of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA). For the…”
Roberts v. Beaulieu of Am., Inc., 950 F. Supp. 1509 (N.D. Ala. 1996). “1 Plaintiff moved to remand on November 13, 1995, contending that retaliatory discharge claims “arise under Alabama’s worker’s compensation laws” and, accordingly, are not removable to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c), which provides: (c) A civil action in any…”
Derrick E. Harper v. Autoalliance Int'l, Inc., Aai Emp. Servs. Co., L.L.C., Jeffrey Kelly, & Allen Childress, 392 F.3d 195 (6th Cir. 2004). “The court further held that removal was proper notwithstanding 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c), which prohibits the removal of a civil action “arising under the workmen’s compensation laws” of a state.”
Farrior v. Sodexho, U.S.A., 953 F. Supp. 1301 (N.D. Ala. 1997). “1 is a part of the Workers’ Compensation Act the court turns to 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c), which follows, to see if the instant action was properly removed: A civil action in any State court arising under the workmen’s compensation laws of such State may not be removed to any…”
Bartel ex rel. Est. of Bishop v. Alcoa S.S. Co., 64 F. Supp. 3d 843 (M.D. La. 2014). “Plaintiff asserts that removal is improper because (1) his Jones Act claims are non-removable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (a), (2) his general maritime law claims are non-removable pursuant to the “saving to suitors” clause of 28 U.”
Hanna v. Fleetguard, Inc., 900 F. Supp. 1110 (N.D. Iowa 1995). “This epitome of comity and sovereignty is 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c), the statute prohibiting the removal of civil actions “arising under” the workers’ compensation laws.”
Hummel v. Kamehameha Schs./Bernice Pauahi Bishop Est., 749 F. Supp. 1023 (D. Haw. 1990). “Plaintiff argues that defendants improperly removed this action since 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) prohibits removal of actions arising under state workers’ compensation laws.”
Gomez v. O'Reilly Auto. Stores, Inc., 283 F. Supp. 3d 569 (W.D. Tex. 2017). “Plaintiff responded with the instant Motion on October 11, 2017, arguing that removal was improper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c). Mot. ¶ 1, ECF No. 6.”
Husk v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 842 F. Supp. 895 (S.D.W. Va 1994). “The Plaintiff argues in his motion to remand that the case may not be removed to this court because removal is prohibited by 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) (1978), which states: "A civil action in any State court arising under the workmen's compensation laws of such State may not be…”
New York City Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Ebbers (In Re WorldCom, Inc. Sec. Litig.), 293 B.R. 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). “The Jones Act removal bar, contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (a), like Section 22(a), provides plaintiff with a choice-of-forum privilege.”
Walter Spearman v. Exxon Coal Usa, Inc., 16 F.3d 722 (7th Cir. 1994). “The potential obstacle is 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c): “A civil action in any State court arising under the workmen’s compensation laws of such State may not be removed to any district court of the United States.”
Wilson v. Lowe's Home Ctr., Inc., 401 F. Supp. 2d 186 (D. Conn. 2005). “The first seeks an order remanding the action, in whole or in part, based on 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c), which prohibits removal of a civil action arising under the forum state’s workers’ compensation laws.”
Am. Dredging Co. v. Miller, 510 U.S. 443 (1994). “See 28 U. S. C. § 1445 (a); 46 U. S. C. App. § 688(a); In re Dutile, 935 F.”
Vasquez v. North Cnty. Transit Dist., 292 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2002). “28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c). The district court disagreed, ruling that the claim did not arise under the workers’ compensation law.”
Demay v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 592 F.3d 907 (8th Cir. 2010). “See 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (a) (“A civil action in any State court against a railroad .”
Vasquez v. Dillard's, Inc., 2016 OK 89 (Okla. 2016). “The court concludes that the OIEBA (sic) is part of Oklahoma's statutory scheme governing occupational injuries and workplace liability; in other words, the OIEBA (sic) is part of Oklahoma's statutory scheme governing workmen's compensation.”
Bearden v. PNS Stores, Inc., 894 F. Supp. 1418 (D. Nev. 1995). “This matter was submitted to the undersigned Magistrate Judge on Plaintiffs’ Motion For Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c). (# 23). 1 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, Jack and Cindy Bearden (the Beardens), originally filed this action in the Eighth Judicial District Court for the…”
Lawson v. Tyco Elec. Corp., 286 F. Supp. 2d 639 (M.D.N.C. 2003). “Plaintiffs Motion to Remand is based on grounds that the amount in controversy requirement for federal diversity jurisdiction is not met and that the case is barred from removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c). Plaintiffs Motion to Remand will be granted.”
Guthrie v. Dow Chem. Co., 445 F. Supp. 311 (S.D. Tex. 1978). “” In this connection, plaintiffs contend that this cause is non-removable because of the terms and provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1445 , which provide that: “.”
Obeid v. Meridian Auto. Sys., 296 F. Supp. 2d 751 (E.D. Mich. 2003). “Plaintiffs instant motion seeks remand arguing that the case is not removable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) because it involves a civil action arising under Michigan’s workers’ compensation laws.”
Matthew Burda v. M. Ecker Co., 954 F.2d 434 (7th Cir. 1992). “Subject Matter Jurisdiction Burda argues that his action arose under the Illinois Worker’s Compensation Act and therefore removal to federal court is barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c). 2 In order to determine whether Burda’s claim was removable to federal court, we must examine the…”
Figueroa v. Healthmark Partners, L.L.C., 125 F. Supp. 2d 209 (S.D. Tex. 2000). “Thereafter, on October 11, 2000, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Remand urging that 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) prohibits re *210 moving this action because this is a case “arising under the workmen’s compensation laws” of the State of Texas.”
Wagner v. FedEx Freight, Inc., 315 F. Supp. 3d 916 (N.D. Tex. 2018). “001(b) -this action is not removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c). Pls.' Mot. to Remand, at 2 (ECF No.”
Sandlass v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 462 F. Supp. 2d 701 (D. Maryland 2006). “Currently pending before this Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Remand, which asserts that this action is a non-removable action under 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c). The parties’ submissions have been reviewed and no hearing is necessary.”
Kenneth C. Vantine & Rebecca Vantine v. Elkhart Brass Mfg. Co., Inc. & Wausau Ins. Co., 762 F.2d 511 (7th Cir. 1985). “Moreover, alleging that a tort action of retaliatory discharge for filing a workmen’s compensation claim “arises under the Indiana Workmen’s Compensation laws,” the plaintiffs conclude that the district court’s jurisdiction is barred under 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) which prohibits…”
Cedillo v. Valcar Enter. & Darling Delaware Co., 773 F. Supp. 932 (N.D. Tex. 1991). “FITZWATER, District Judge: Plaintiff’s motion to remand presents the questions whether a workers’ compensation retaliation action made nonremovable by 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) becomes removable when pendent to a federal question claim and whether the court should exercise…”
Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Finn, 341 U.S. 6 (1951). “) § 71; 28 U. S. C. § 1445 . [3] Care was taken to maintain opportunity for state trial of nonfederal matters.”
Beaver v. NPC Int'l, Inc., 451 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (D. Or. 2006). “Plaintiff contends that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the case does not involve the requisite amount in controversy and because 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) precludes removal to federal court of civil actions arising under state workers’ compensation laws.”
Lewis v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc., 531 U.S. 438 (2001). “Respondent’s arguments to limit and enumerate the saved remedies under the saving to suitors clause must fail in view of the consistent recognition by Congress and this Court that both state and federal courts may be proper forums for adjudicating claims such as petitioner’s.”
Bell v. Vecellio & Grogan, Inc., 475 S.E.2d 138 (W. Va. 1996). “11 We are not unmindful of two eases within the federal system which have addressed the question of whether the deliberate intention exception to an employer’s immunity from suit under W.”
Morgan Yawn, Jr. v. S. Ry. Co., Etc., 591 F.2d 312 (5th Cir. 1979). “Reasoning that the employees had cast what were clearly grievance claims in the form of FELA cases in order to avoid the grievance procedure and the National Railroad Adjustment Board, the district court denied the employees’ motions to remand to state court and granted the…”
Thompson v. Cort Furniture Rental Corp., 797 F. Supp. 618 (W.D. Tenn. 1992). “Plaintiff contends that under 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (e) this action was improvidently removed by defendant inasmuch as it arises under Tennessee’s worker’s compensation laws.”
Bynum v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 756 F.3d 282 (4th Cir. 2014). “Bynums motion also asserted that his “claim is not removable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (a)” — which bars removal of FELA claims brought in state court 2 — “and that it is not removable under 28 U.”
Charles Gonsalves v. Amoco Shipping Co., 733 F.2d 1020 (2d Cir. 1984). “The appeal reveals the tension between Congress’ preference to permit a plaintiff to maintain a Jones Act suit in state court, without risk of removal, 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (a) (1982), and its permission to a defendant to remove an entire lawsuit when a removable claim that is…”
Shanks v. Globe Metallurgical, Inc., 390 F. Supp. 3d 1323 (U.S. Cir. Ct. 2019). “Judge Murray found that the claims against the non-diverse Defendants did not arise under the Alabama Worker's Compensation Act, and therefore, that 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) did not prohibit their removal.”
Russell v. Wendy's Int'l, Inc., 219 S.W.3d 629 (Tex. App. 2007). “” However, the federal cases cited by Wendy’s address 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c) (2006), a federal statutory provision preventing the removal to federal court of a case filed in state court if such case is one “arising under the workers’ compensation laws” of the state.”
Wiley v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 227 F. Supp. 2d 480 (M.D.N.C. 2002). “§ 1332 , but barred from removal by 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c). For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs Motion to Remand will be granted, and Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs associated with his motion for remand will be denied.”
Gibson v. Wyatt Cafeterias, Inc., 782 F. Supp. 331 (E.D. Tex. 1992). “Prohibition on Removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c)? Plaintiff claims that this civil action should not have been removed to federal court because it arises under the Act.”
Armistead v. C & M Transp., Inc., 49 F.3d 43 (1st Cir. 1995).
Donald Gregory Linton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. & S.S. Mut. Underwriting Ass'n (Bermuda) Ltd., 964 F.2d 1480 (5th Cir. 1992). “Although it might appear that a plain reading of 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (a) (Jones Act cases filed in state court are not removable) decides this case, we have nevertheless held that this statutory bar to removal may be waived by the plaintiff.”
In Re Csx Transp., Inc., Larry W. Shives v. Csx Transp. Inc., 151 F.3d 164 (4th Cir. 1998).
Kilpatrick v. Martin K. Eby Const. Co., Inc., 708 F. Supp. 1241 (N.D. Ala. 1989).
Bartel ex rel. Est. of Dennis v. Am. Exp. Isbrandtsen, 64 F. Supp. 3d 856 (M.D. La. 2014).
James Hefren v. Murphy Expl & Prodn Co., USA, et a, 820 F.3d 767 (5th Cir. 2016).
Northbrook Nat'l Ins. v. Brewer, 493 U.S. 6 (1989).
Brenda Pope v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 937 F.2d 258 (5th Cir. 1991).
Escobar v. Celebration Cruise Operator, Inc., 805 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2015).
Stemmle v. Interlake S.S. Co., 198 F. Supp. 3d 149 (E.D.N.Y 2016).
Alabama Mun. Workers Comp. Fund, Inc. v. P.R. Diamond Prods., Inc., 234 F. Supp. 3d 1165 (N.D. Ala. 2017). “Because 28 U.S.C § 1445(c) prohibits removal of actions “arising under the workmen’s compensation laws of [a] state,” AMWCF argues, the Court must remand the case.”
Gilda F. Williams v. Ac Spark Plugs Div. of Gen. Motors Corp., 985 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1993).
Gregoire v. Enter. Marine Servs., LLC, 38 F. Supp. 3d 749 (E.D. La. 2014).
Clay E. Monroe v. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co. & Union Pac. R.R. Co., 115 F.3d 514 (7th Cir. 1997).
Bell v. Illinois Cent. R.R., 236 F. Supp. 2d 882 (N.D. Ill. 2001).
Coronel v. AK Victory, 1 F. Supp. 3d 1175 (W.D. Wash. 2014).
Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines, 343 F.3d 769 (5th Cir. 2003).
Ex Parte Hood, 712 So. 2d 341 (Ala. 1998).
Sanchez v. Smart Fabricators of TX, 997 F.3d 564 (5th Cir. 2021).
Lamar v. Home Depot, 907 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (S.D. Ala. 2012).
Miley v. Hous. Auth., 926 F. Supp. 2d 420 (D. Conn. 2013).
Breuer v. Jim's Concrete of Brevard, Inc., 538 U.S. 691 (2003).
Am. Int'l Specialty Lines Ins. v. Rentech Steel, L.L.C., 620 F.3d 558 (5th Cir. 2010).
Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp., 461 F. Supp. 649 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lee Inv. LLC, 641 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2011).
Haines v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins., 812 F. Supp. 93 (S.D. Tex. 1993).
Norris Lirette v. N.L. Sperry Sun, Inc. & Quarles Drilling Co., 820 F.2d 116 (5th Cir. 1987).
Herman Fields v. Pool Offshore, Inc., Pool Co., Incorrectly Sued as Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2000).
Angel M. Cosme Nieves v. Col. Robert C. Deshler, Etc., 786 F.2d 445 (1st Cir. 1986).
Vinson v. Schneider Nat'l Carriers, Inc., 942 F. Supp. 2d 630 (N.D. Tex. 2013).
Johnson v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., 163 F. Supp. 3d 338 (E.D. La. 2016).
Radcliff v. El Paso Corp., 377 F. Supp. 2d 558 (S.D.W. Va 2005).
Mims v. Deepwater Corrosion Servs., Inc., 90 F. Supp. 3d 679 (S.D. Tex. 2015).
Delaware & Hudson Ry. Co. v. Knoedler Mfrs., Inc., 781 F.3d 656 (3rd Cir. 2015).
Anderson v. BNSF Ry., 2015 MT 240 (Mont. 2015).
Kemp v. Dayton Tire & Rubber Co., 435 F. Supp. 1062 (W.D. Okla. 1977).
John Wyeth & Brother Ltd. v. Cigna Int'l Corp., 119 F.3d 1070 (3rd Cir. 1997).
Bastian v. Travelers Ins., 784 F. Supp. 1253 (N.D. Tex. 1992).
Fed. Reserve Bank of Atlanta v. Thomas, 220 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2000).
In Re Excel Corp., Cargill, Inc. Freddie Franklin Steve Steffe, 106 F.3d 1197 (5th Cir. 1997).
Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc., 69 F.3d 1 (5th Cir. 1995).
Haun v. Retail Credit Co., 420 F. Supp. 859 (W.D. Pa. 1976).
Lewis v. Cj Langenfelder & Son, Jr., 587 S.E.2d 697 (Va. 2003).
Gary C. Lancaster v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 773 F.2d 807 (7th Cir. 1985).
Goble v. City of Brunswick, 491 F. Supp. 2d 722 (N.D. Ohio 2007).
Curtis P. BALDWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & Co., Defendant-Appellee, 667 F.2d 458 (5th Cir. 1982).
Santee v. Oceaneering Intl, 95 F.4th 917 (5th Cir. 2024).
Katz v. Gerardi, 552 F.3d 558 (7th Cir. 2009).
Del Carmen Esparza v. Jozwiak, 391 F. Supp. 2d 504 (E.D. Tex. 2005).
Albarado v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 199 F.3d 762 (5th Cir. 1999).
Hackworth v. Guyan Heavy Equip., Inc., 613 F. Supp. 2d 908 (E.D. Ky. 2009).
Lunsford v. Cemex, Inc., 733 F. Supp. 2d 652 (M.D.N.C. 2010).
Thomas v. Kroger Co., 583 F. Supp. 1031 (S.D.W. Va 1984).
Sanders v. Cambrian Consultants (CC) Am., Inc., 132 F. Supp. 3d 853 (S.D. Tex. 2015).
Arthur v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 58 F.3d 121 (4th Cir. 1995).
Chatman v. Saks Fifth Avenue of Texas, Inc., 762 F. Supp. 152 (S.D. Tex. 1991).
Rundle v. Frontier-Kemper Constructors, Inc., 170 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (D. Colo. 2001).
Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 132 S. Ct. 740 (2012).
Mindy Bloom v. Metro Heart Grp. of St. Louis, Inc., 440 F.3d 1025 (8th Cir. 2006).
Besse v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 721 S.W.2d 740 (Mo. 1986).
Nabors v. City of Arlington, Tex., 688 F. Supp. 1165 (E.D. Tex. 1988). “28 U.S.C. § 1445(c) Plaintiff’s sole argument is that section 1445(c) mandates the remand of this case.”
Colin K. v. Schmidt, 528 F. Supp. 355 (D.R.I. 1981).
New York & Massachusetts Motor Serv., Inc. v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 517 N.E.2d 1270 (Mass. 1988).
William Jones v. Roadway Express, Inc., 931 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1991).
James R. Laduke v. Burlington N. R.R. Co., 879 F.2d 1556 (7th Cir. 1989).
Wallace v. Ryan-Walsh Stevedoring Co., Inc., 708 F. Supp. 144 (E.D. Tex. 1989).
Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 664 F. Supp. 290 (E.D. Tenn. 1987).
Walker v. Health Benefit Mgmt. Cost Containment, Inc., 860 F. Supp. 1163 (N.D. Tex. 1994).
Spellman v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 540 F. Supp. 2d 237 (D. Me. 2008).
Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc., 77 F.3d 782 (5th Cir. 1996).
Norris Lirette v. N.L. Sperry Sun, Inc. & Quarles Drilling Co., 831 F.2d 554 (5th Cir. 1987).
Green v. Hajoca Corp., 573 F. Supp. 1120 (E.D. Va. 1983).
Simmons v. California, Dep't of Indus. Relations, Div. of Labor Standards Enf't, 740 F. Supp. 781 (E.D. Cal. 1990).
Clifton Jackson v. Segwick Claims Mgmt. Servs., 699 F.3d 466 (6th Cir. 2012).
Eric Rothner D/B/A Chicago Game Co., & D/B/A Bell Vending, Inc. v. City of Chicago, a Mun. Corp., 879 F.2d 1402 (7th Cir. 1989).
Ronald Ward v. Soo Line R.R. Co., 901 F.3d 868 (7th Cir. 2018).
David Burchett & Cheryl Burchett v. Cargill, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Equip. Mgmt. Corp., 48 F.3d 173 (5th Cir. 1995).
Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co., 846 F.2d 1190 (9th Cir. 1988).
Warner v. Crum & Forster Com. Ins., 839 F. Supp. 436 (N.D. Tex. 1993).
Subra v. CMS Therapies, Inc., 900 F. Supp. 407 (M.D. Ala. 1995).
Roberts v. Citicorp Diners Club, Inc., 597 F. Supp. 311 (D. Maryland 1984).
Alexander v. Westinghouse Hittman Nuclear Inc., 612 F. Supp. 1118 (N.D. Ill. 1985).
Waycaster v. At & T Tech., Inc., 636 F. Supp. 1052 (N.D. Ill. 1986).
Greg & Paige Eastus v. Blue Bell Creameries, L.P., 97 F.3d 100 (5th Cir. 1996).
Alicia Whitehurst v. Wal-Mart Super Ctr., 306 F. App'x 446 (11th Cir. 2008).
In Re Mitchell Dutile, Nichole Dutile & Ashley Dutile, 935 F.2d 61 (5th Cir. 1991).
Winston B. Lewy v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 799 F.2d 1281 (9th Cir. 1986).
Hufnagel v. Omega Serv. Indus., Inc., 182 F.3d 340 (5th Cir. 1999).
Landerman v. Tarpon Operating & Dev., L.L.C., 19 F. Supp. 3d 678 (E.D. La. 2014).
Feichko v. Denver & Rio Grande W. R.R., 213 F.3d 586 (10th Cir. 2000).
White v. Mayflower Transit, L.L.C., 543 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2008).
Richardson v. Owens-Illinois Glass Container, Inc., 698 F. Supp. 673 (W.D. Tex. 1988). “8307c (Vernon Supp.1988). Initially, the Court notes that a civil action arising under state workmen’s compensation laws should not be removed to a district court of the United States.”
Sanchez v. Enter. Offshore Drilling LLC, 376 F. Supp. 3d 726 (S.D. Tex. 2019).
Santee v. Oceaneering Intl, 110 F.4th 800 (5th Cir. 2024).
Formosa v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., 806 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (N.D. Ala. 2011).
Lockard v. Equifax, Inc., 163 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 1998).
Donald R. Foval v. First Nat'l Bank of Com. in New Orleans, & Robert D. Brown, 841 F.2d 126 (1st Cir. 1988).
James Phillips Regina M. Phillips v. Ford Motor Co., 83 F.3d 235 (8th Cir. 1996).
Allsup v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 782 F. Supp. 325 (N.D. Tex. 1991).
Combined Mgmt., Inc. v. Superintendent of the Bureau of Ins. of the State of Maine, 22 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1994).
Gonzales v. City of Mesa, 779 F. Supp. 1050 (D. Ariz. 1991).
Rozzell v. Sec. Servs., Inc., 38 F.3d 819 (5th Cir. 1994).
Blackmore v. Rock-Tenn Co., Mill Div., Inc., 756 F. Supp. 288 (N.D. Tex. 1991).
Breuer v. Jim's Concrete of Brevard, Inc., 292 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 2002).
Christine Baldracchi v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Div., United Tech. Corp., 814 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1987).
Cook v. Shell Chem. Co.(Shell Oil Co.), 730 F. Supp. 1381 (M.D. La. 1990).
Robert J. Johnson v. Odeco Oil & Gas Co., 864 F.2d 40 (5th Cir. 1989).
Sierra Club, Etc. v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Etc., 926 F.2d 429 (5th Cir. 1991).
Hill v. Moss-Am., Inc., 309 F. Supp. 1175 (N.D. Miss. 1970).
Almanza v. Transcontinental Ins., 802 F. Supp. 1474 (N.D. Tex. 1992).
Dist. of Columbia, Ex Rel. Am. Combustion, Inc. v. Transamerica Ins. Co., 797 F.2d 1041 (D.C. Cir. 1986).
Salveson v. W. States Bankcard Ass'n, 525 F. Supp. 566 (N.D. Cal. 1981).
John D. Addison v. Gulf Coast Contracting Servs., Inc. & Texaco, Inc., 744 F.2d 494 (5th Cir. 1984).
Robert M. Nordgren v. Burlington N. R.R. Co., a Delaware Corp., 101 F.3d 1246 (8th Cir. 1997).
Williams v. Cnh Am., LLC, 542 F. Supp. 2d 1261 (M.D. Ala. 2008).
Louisiana United Bus. Ass'n Cas. Ins. v. J & J Maint., Inc., 133 F. Supp. 3d 852 (W.D. La. 2015).
Petri v. Kestrel Oil & Gas Props., L.P., 878 F. Supp. 2d 744 (S.D. Tex. 2012).
Priest v. Sealift Servs. Int'l, Inc., 953 F. Supp. 363 (N.D. Ala. 1997).
Graef v. Chem. Leaman Tank Lines, 860 F. Supp. 1170 (E.D. Tex. 1994).
Norris Lirette v. N.L. Sperry Sun, Inc. & Quarles Drilling Co., 810 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1987).
Reed v. Heil Co., 206 F.3d 1055 (11th Cir. 2000).
TIG Ins. v. Deaton, Inc., 932 F. Supp. 132 (W.D.N.C. 1996).
Robert H. Dorsey v. The City of Detroit, 858 F.2d 338 (6th Cir. 1988).
City of Jacksonville v. Dep't of the Navy, 348 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2003).
Apollo Enter., Inc. v. Scripnet, Inc., 301 S.W.3d 848 (Tex. App. 2009).
Dumitru v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., 732 F. Supp. 2d 328 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).
Alexander by Alexander v. Goldome Credit Corp., 772 F. Supp. 1217 (M.D. Ala. 1991).
Miller v. M.F.S. York/Stormor, 595 N.W.2d 878 (Neb. 1999).
Lingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 823 F.2d 1031 (7th Cir. 1987).
Nesbitt v. Bun Basket, Inc., 780 F. Supp. 1151 (W.D. Mich. 1991).
Moreland v. Gold Kist, Inc., 908 F. Supp. 898 (N.D. Ala. 1995).
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners of Jacksonville Ltd. P'ship, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988).
Abdul Alansari v. Tropic Star Seafood Inc., 388 F. App'x 902 (11th Cir. 2010).
Valdivieso v. Atlas Air, Inc., 128 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (S.D. Fla. 2001).
Escobedo v. Time Warner Ent. Advance Newhouse P'ship, 811 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (W.D. Tex. 2011).
Arnett v. Leviton Mfg., Inc., 174 F. Supp. 2d 410 (W.D.N.C. 2001).
William Jones v. Roadway Express, Inc., 936 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1991).
Timothy P. Suder v. Blue Circle, Inc., an Alabama Corp., 116 F.3d 1351 (10th Cir. 1997).
James Lewis v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 758 F.2d 219 (7th Cir. 1985).
The Home Indem. Co. v. Claude Moore, 499 F.2d 1202 (8th Cir. 1974).
Payne v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 154 F. Supp. 3d 1310 (M.D. Fla. 2016).
In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., ATX, ATX II, 128 F. Supp. 2d 1198 (S.D. Ind. 2001).
Bear MGC Cutlery Co. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc., 132 F. Supp. 2d 937 (N.D. Ala. 2001).
Wehby v. Springer Equip. Co., 155 F. Supp. 3d 1221 (N.D. Ala. 2016).
Prescott v. United States, 523 F. Supp. 918 (D. Nev. 1981).
Strickland Transp. Co., Inc. v. Am. Distrib. Co, 198 F.2d 546 (5th Cir. 1952).
Foust v. City Ins., 704 F. Supp. 752 (W.D. Tex. 1989).
Talbot v. Saipem A.G., 835 F. Supp. 352 (S.D. Tex. 1993).
Dean v. Texas Steel Co., 837 F. Supp. 212 (N.D. Tex. 1993).
Bonney v. Canadian Nat'l Ry. Co., 100 F.R.D. 388 (D. Me. 1983).
Lackey v. Atl. Richfield Co., 990 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1993).
Carraway v. Mayflower Transit, Inc., 36 F. Supp. 2d 262 (E.D.N.C. 1998).
Cuevas v. Monroe Street City Club, Inc., 752 F. Supp. 1405 (N.D. Ill. 1990).
Zurich Am. Ins. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 242 F. Supp. 2d 736 (E.D. Cal. 2003).
Toney v. Lowery Woodyards & Emp.'s Ins., 278 F. Supp. 2d 786 (S.D. Miss. 2003).
Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Puckett, 822 S.W.2d 133 (Tex. App. 1991).
Eddy v. Inland Bay Drilling & Workover, Inc., 784 F. Supp. 370 (S.D. Tex. 1992).
Houston v. Newark Boxboard Co., 597 F. Supp. 989 (E.D. Wis. 1984).
Silverman v. Browning, 414 F. Supp. 80 (D. Conn. 1976).
Sbrusch v. Dow Chem. Co., 124 F. Supp. 2d 1090 (S.D. Tex. 2000).
Fusco v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC, 806 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (M.D. Fla. 2011).
Volkswagen De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Labor Relations Bd., 454 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1972).
Moore v. Cna Found., 472 F. Supp. 2d 1327 (M.D. Ala. 2007).
Nixon v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 156 F. App'x 784 (6th Cir. 2005).
Lewis v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son, Jr., Inc., 2004 A.M.C. 2245 (Va. 2003).
Albert Peak v. Small Bus. Admin., 660 F.2d 375 (8th Cir. 1981).
Powers v. Travelers Ins., 664 F. Supp. 252 (S.D. Miss. 1987).
Mize v. Amercraft Corp., 874 F. Supp. 356 (M.D. Ala. 1994).
Sw. Gulfcoast, Inc. v. Allan, 513 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Michael v. Marion Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 482 S.E.2d 140 (W. Va. 1996).
McConnell v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n Benefit Plans, Dist. 1, 526 F. Supp. 770 (N.D. Cal. 1981).
Boakye v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., 295 F. Supp. 3d 1342 (N.D. Ga. 2018).
State Ex Rel. Great N. Ry. Co. v. Dist. Court of the Second Jud. Dist., 365 P.2d 512 (Mont. 1961).
Gray v. New York Life Ins., 906 F. Supp. 628 (N.D. Ala. 1995).
Brown v. K-MAC Enter., 897 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (N.D. Okla. 2012).
Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, 925 F. Supp. 2d 810 (N.D. Tex. 2013).
Paz R. Hernandez v. The Travelers Ins. Co., 489 F.2d 721 (5th Cir. 1974).
Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Morris, 118 F. Supp. 3d 1288 (N.D. Ala. 2015).
Andrew Johnson v. Agco Corp., 159 F.3d 1114 (8th Cir. 1998).
Lowe's of Montgomery, Inc. v. Smith, 432 F. Supp. 1008 (M.D. Ala. 1977).
Iwag v. Geisel Compania Maritima, S.A., 882 F. Supp. 597 (S.D. Tex. 1995).
Milam v. Herrlin, 819 F. Supp. 295 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).
Chapman v. 8th Jud. Juv. Prob. Bd., 22 F. Supp. 2d 583 (E.D. Tex. 1998).
Barber v. Pepsi-Cola Pers., Inc., 78 F. Supp. 2d 683 (W.D. Mich. 1999).
Lackey v. Gateway Homes, Inc., 944 F. Supp. 870 (N.D. Ala. 1996).
Scales v. Natl. R.R. Passenger Corp., 634 F. Supp. 1 (E.D. Pa. 1984).
U. S. Indus., Inc. v. Gregg, 348 F. Supp. 1004 (D. Del. 1972).
Fitzgerald v. Bestway Servs., Inc., 284 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (N.D. Ala. 2003).
Carey v. Bank of Am., N.A., 904 F. Supp. 2d 617 (N.D. Tex. 2012).
Pettaway v. Wayne Poultry Co., 791 F. Supp. 290 (M.D. Ala. 1992).
Orsini v. Echlin, Inc., 637 F. Supp. 38 (N.D. Ill. 1986).
Kattelman v. Otis Eng'g Corp., 701 F. Supp. 560 (E.D. La. 1988).
Hages v. Aliquippa & S. R.R., 427 F. Supp. 889 (W.D. Pa. 1977).
Miller v. Phillips Petroleum Co. Norway, 537 A.2d 190 (Del. 1988).
Anthony v. West Coast Drug Co., 331 F. Supp. 1279 (W.D. Wash. 1971).
Mercy Hosp. Ass'n v. Miccio, 604 F. Supp. 1177 (E.D.N.Y 1985).
Gates Constr. Corp. v. Koschak, 792 F. Supp. 334 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).
Guilbeaux v. 3927 Found., Inc., 177 F.R.D. 387 (E.D. Tex. 1998).
Otero v. Hous. Auth. of Bridgeport, 860 A.2d 285 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004).
Tanguis v. M/v Westchester, 153 F. Supp. 2d 859 (E.D. La. 2001).
In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Prods. Liab. Litig., 522 F. Supp. 2d 557 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
Rogers v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 133 F.3d 309 (5th Cir. 1998).
Ayers v. ARA Health Servs., Inc., 918 F. Supp. 143 (D. Maryland 1995).
Abing v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, 538 F. Supp. 1193 (D. Minnesota 1982).
Lowe v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 529 F. Supp. 491 (S.D. Ill. 1982).
Pakledinaz v. Consol. Rail Corp., 737 F. Supp. 47 (E.D. Mich. 1990).
Blair v. Schott Sci. Glass Co., 945 F. Supp. 123 (S.D.W. Va 1996).
Howard v. Transworld Drilling Co., 592 F. Supp. 1305 (W.D. La. 1984).
Samczyk v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 643 F. Supp. 79 (E.D. Mich. 1986).
Goin v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, 437 F. Supp. 2d 762 (W.D. Tenn. 2006).
Edna Marzuki v. At & T Tech., Inc., 878 F.2d 203 (7th Cir. 1989).
Gilbert Ehler v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 66 F.3d 771 (5th Cir. 1995).
Lalondriz v. USA Networks, Inc., 68 F. Supp. 2d 285 (S.D.N.Y. 1999).
Escuadra v. Geovera Specialty Ins., 739 F. Supp. 2d 967 (E.D. Tex. 2010).
Bendlis v. NCL (Banamas), Ltd., 112 F. Supp. 3d 1339 (S.D. Fla. 2015).
Hines v. Marriott Int'l, Inc., 246 F. Supp. 2d 815 (N.D. Ohio 2002).
McCormack v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co., 436 F. Supp. 2d 857 (E.D. Ky. 2006).
Raye v. Emp.'s Ins. of Wausau, 345 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (S.D. Ala. 2004).
Terry Boyd v. BNSF Ry. Co., 858 N.W.2d 797 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014).
Doe v. Access Indus., Inc., 137 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D. Mass. 2015).
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Ins. Co., 181 F. Supp. 3d 347 (S.D. Tex. 2015).
Meeks v. Swift Transp., Inc., 398 F. App'x 980 (5th Cir. 2010).
C. Randolph Evans v. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co. & Joseph Falvey, 795 F.2d 57 (8th Cir. 1986).
Olivarez v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 710 F. Supp. 642 (N.D. Tex. 1989).
Watson v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins., 715 F. Supp. 797 (W.D. Tex. 1989).
Webster v. Dow United Tech. Composite Prods., Inc., 925 F. Supp. 727 (M.D. Ala. 1996).
Finley v. Higbee Co., 1 F. Supp. 2d 701 (N.D. Ohio 1997).
Eusebio Chacon v. The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., a Corp., 320 F.2d 331 (10th Cir. 1963).
James River Apts., Inc. v. Fed. Hous. Admin., 136 F. Supp. 24 (D. Maryland 1955).
Kubicik v. Apex Oil Co. (In re Apex Oil Co.), 884 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1989).
Glenda Pope v. Bethesda Health Ctr., Inc., Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., Defendants, 813 F.2d 1306 (4th Cir. 1987).
Biglari Imp. & Exp., Inc. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. (In Re Biglari Imp. & Exp., Inc.), 142 B.R. 777 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1992).
Decubas v. Norfolk S. Corp., 683 F. Supp. 259 (M.D. Ga. 1988).
Mary Ernewayn v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 727 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 2013).
Moore v. Bis Salamis, Inc., 748 F. Supp. 2d 598 (E.D. Tex. 2010).
Bumgardner v. Spotless Enter., Inc., 287 F. Supp. 2d 630 (W.D.N.C. 2003).
Nikolay Trifonov v. MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. SA, 590 F. App'x 842 (11th Cir. 2014).
Shaw v. Ring Power Corp., 917 F. Supp. 2d 1221 (N.D. Fla. 2013).
Patton v. Adesa Texas, Inc., 985 F. Supp. 2d 818 (N.D. Tex. 2013).
Mrs. Ruby L. Porter, Adm'x of the Est. of James A. Porter, Deceased v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 354 F.2d 840 (5th Cir. 1966).
State of North Carolina v. United States, 7 F.4th 160 (4th Cir. 2021).
Campos v. Housland, Inc., 824 F. Supp. 100 (S.D. Tex. 1993).
Int'l Coll. of Surgeons v. City of Chicago, 91 F.3d 981 (7th Cir. 1996).
Grover C. Kay v. The Home Indem. Co., 337 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1965).
Aquafaith Shipping, Ltd. v. Jarillas, 963 F.2d 806 (5th Cir. 1992).
Gleichauf v. Ginsberg, 859 F. Supp. 229 (S.D.W. Va 1994).
Pace v. Hunt, 847 F. Supp. 508 (S.D. Miss. 1994).
DeBello v. Brown & Root, Inc., 809 F. Supp. 482 (E.D. Tex. 1992).
Sawyer v. Fed. Barge Lines, Inc., 577 F. Supp. 37 (S.D. Ill. 1982).
McClelland v. Gronwaldt, 909 F. Supp. 457 (E.D. Tex. 1995).
Zoila-Ortego v. B J-Titan Servs. Co., 751 F. Supp. 633 (E.D. La. 1990).
Nielsen v. Weeks Marine, Inc., 910 F. Supp. 84 (E.D.N.Y 1995).
Barker v. Pick N Pull Auto Dismantlers, Inc., 819 F. Supp. 889 (E.D. Cal. 1993).
Soto v. Tonka Corp., 716 F. Supp. 977 (W.D. Tex. 1989).
Peturis v. Int'l Harvester Credit Corp., 496 F. Supp. 203 (S.D. Ala. 1980).
Ryder Servs. Corp. v. Savage, 945 F. Supp. 232 (N.D. Ala. 1996).
Grant v. Davey Tree Expert Co., Inc., 8 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (S.D. Ala. 1998).
Baldwin v. Jarrett Bay Yacht Sales, LLC, 683 F. Supp. 2d 385 (E.D.N.C. 2009).
Mencer v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc., 695 F. Supp. 2d 667 (S.D. Ohio 2010).
Amizola v. Dolphin Shipowner, S.A., 354 F. Supp. 2d 689 (E.D. La. 2004).
Illinois Nat'l Ins. v. Hagendorf Constr. Co., 337 F. Supp. 2d 902 (W.D. Tex. 2004).
Smith v. Tubal-Cain Indus., Inc., 196 F. Supp. 2d 421 (E.D. Tex. 2001).
Kimmel v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co., 210 F. Supp. 2d 850 (S.D. Tex. 2002).
Dillard's, Inc. v. Gallups, 58 So. 3d 196 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010).
Jacob Suissa v. Am. Exp. Lines, Inc. (F/k/a Am. Exp. Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.), 507 F.2d 1343 (2d Cir. 1974).
Pratt, Bradford & Tobin, P.C. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 885 F. Supp. 1126 (S.D. Ill. 1994).
Tyree v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 973 F. Supp. 786 (W.D. Tenn. 1997).
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Ebanks, 870 F. Supp. 1112 (S.D. Ga. 1994).
Angone v. 990 Lake Shore Drive Home Owners Ass'n, 866 F. Supp. 377 (N.D. Ill. 1994).
Keyser v. Kroger Co., 800 F. Supp. 476 (N.D. Tex. 1992).
Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc., 865 F. Supp. 370 (E.D. Tex. 1994).
Lewis v. Rhodes, Inc., 968 F. Supp. 633 (N.D. Ala. 1997).
Smith v. Am. Econ. Ins. Co., 794 S.W.2d 574 (Tex. App. 1990).
Fox v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 755 F. Supp. 265 (E.D. Mo. 1991).
Gamble v. Cent. of Georgia Ry. Co., 356 F. Supp. 324 (M.D. Ala. 1973).
Moltke v. Intercontinental Shipping Corp., 86 F. Supp. 662 (S.D.N.Y. 1949).
Addison v. Sedco Forex, U.S.A., 798 F. Supp. 1273 (N.D. Tex. 1992).
Knox v. Laclede Steel Co., 861 F. Supp. 519 (N.D.W. Va. 1994).
Esquivel v. St. Andrews Constr., 999 F. Supp. 863 (N.D. Tex. 1998).
McAdow v. Promus Companies, Inc., 926 F. Supp. 93 (W.D. La. 1996).
Taft v. Burlington N. R.R. Corp., 926 F. Supp. 866 (D. Minnesota 1996).
Boncouri v. Union Pac. R. Co., 981 F. Supp. 1271 (E.D. Mo. 1997).
H & R Block, Ltd. v. Housden, 24 F. Supp. 2d 703 (E.D. Tex. 1998).
Martinets v. Corning Cable Sys., L.L.C., 237 F. Supp. 2d 717 (N.D. Tex. 2002).
Magruder v. Scope Servs., Inc., 287 F. Supp. 2d 628 (W.D.N.C. 2003).
Waddell v. Edison Chouest Offshore, 93 F. Supp. 3d 714 (S.D. Tex. 2015).
McLean v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc., 842 So. 2d 673 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002).
New Process Steel Corp. v. Union Pac. R.R., 91 F. App'x 895 (5th Cir. 2003).
Harris v. Beaulieu Grp., LLC, 394 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (M.D. Ala. 2005).
Slightom v. Nat'l Maint. & Repair, Inc., 747 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (S.D. Ill. 2010).
Troconis v. Lucent Tech., Inc., 160 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D. Mass. 2001).
Morris v. Mayflower Transit, LLC, 18 F. Supp. 3d 1342 (M.D. Ala. 2014).
Mitev ex rel. Miteva v. Resort Sports Ltd., 133 F. Supp. 3d 1365 (S.D. Fla. 2015).
Belyea v. Florida, 859 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (N.D. Fla. 2012).
Christians v. KemPharm, Inc., 265 F. Supp. 3d 971 (S.D. Iowa 2017).
Rosario v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 158 F. Supp. 537 (S.D.N.Y. 1957). “See 28 U.S. C.A. § 1445(a). Defendants’ petition for removal alleges that the Jones Act claim is a fraud designed to deprive this Court of jurisdiction because: (1) the Jones Act claim is not well pleaded; and, (2) plaintiffs were not in fact employees of defendants.”
Vatican Shrimp Co. v. Solis, 820 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1987).
Peters v. Pumpkin Air, Inc., 635 F. Supp. 825 (M.D. La. 1986).
Pittman v. Port Allen Marine Servs., 794 F. Supp. 593 (M.D. La. 1992).
Keil v. CIGNA & Intracorp Rehab Mgmt., 978 F. Supp. 1365 (D. Colo. 1997).
Brown v. Sasser, 128 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (M.D. Ala. 2000).
Grimm v. Shroyer, 35 F. Supp. 2d 966 (E.D. Ky. 1999).
Kelley v. Norfolk & S. Ry. Co., 80 F. Supp. 2d 587 (S.D.W. Va 1999).
Courville v. Texaco, Inc., 741 F. Supp. 108 (E.D. La. 1990).
S.S. Bethflor v. Joel Thomas, Joel Thomas v. S.S. Bethflor, 364 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1966).
New v. Sports & Rec., Inc., 947 F. Supp. 453 (S.D. Ala. 1996).
Buddy Trahan v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 571 F. App'x 319 (5th Cir. 2014).
Specialty Equip. Mkt. Ass'n v. Ruckelshaus, 720 F.2d 124 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
Newton v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consol., 958 F. Supp. 248 (W.D.N.C. 1997).
Yankton Area Adjustment Training Ctr., Inc. v. Oleson Ex Rel. Oleson, 897 F. Supp. 431 (D.S.D. 1995).
Warren v. United States, 738 F. Supp. 212 (E.D. Ky. 1990).
Glendora v. Pinkerton Sec. & Detective Servs., 25 F. Supp. 2d 447 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).
Asset Mgmt. & Control, Inc. v. ABF Freight Sys., Inc., 18 F. Supp. 2d 187 (N.D.N.Y. 1998).
Hernandez v. Cent. Power & Light, 880 F. Supp. 494 (S.D. Tex. 1994).
Neibuhr v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 955 F. Supp. 135 (D.D.C. 1997).
Tri-State Produce Co. v. Chicago, B. & QR Co., 104 F. Supp. 452 (N.D. Iowa 1952).
Markel Ins. v. S.T.C.G., Inc., 737 F. Supp. 2d 626 (N.D. Tex. 2010).
Anderson v. Union Pac. R.R., 200 F. Supp. 465 (D. Kan. 1962).
Meade v. Pension Appeals & Review Comm., 966 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1992).
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v., 408 F. App'x 563 (3rd Cir. 2010).
Tovar v. Kaplan Higher Educ. Corp., 481 F. Supp. 2d 751 (W.D. Tex. 2007).
Illinois Cent. R.R. v. Cain, 434 F. Supp. 2d 415 (S.D. Miss. 2006).
In Re bridgestone/firestone Tires Prods. Liab., 203 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (S.D. Ind. 2002).
Worldwide Detective Agency, Inc. v. Cannon Cochran Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 622 F. App'x 383 (5th Cir. 2015).
Crews v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 413 F. Supp. 679 (M.D. Fla. 1976).
Civil v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 217 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1954).
Nisbett v. Bridgestone Corp., 203 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (S.D. Ind. 2002).
Eazor Express v. Pennsylvania R.R., 214 F. Supp. 695 (W.D. Pa. 1963).
Lee v. Terex Corp. (N.D. Cal. 2023).
Parker v. Ace Am. Ins. Co. (D. Conn. 2021).
Dobson v. Archer Daniels Midland Co. (E.D.N.C. 2023).
Korber v. Lehman, 221 F. Supp. 358 (S.D.N.Y. 1963).
Ceres Terminals, Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n of Illinois, 53 F.3d 183 (7th Cir. 1995).
Lackey v. Atl. Richfield Co., 983 F.2d 620 (5th Cir. 1993).
Dist. of Columbia v. Ranger Constr. Co., 394 F. Supp. 801 (D.D.C. 1974).
Lichtenberger v. Prudential-bache Sec., Inc., 737 F. Supp. 43 (S.D. Tex. 1990).
Doe v. Bolkiah, 74 F. Supp. 2d 969 (D. Haw. 1998).
Thorne v. WLR Foods, Inc., 111 F. Supp. 2d 744 (N.D.W. Va. 2000).
G.M. Sign, Inc. v. Global Shop Solutions, Inc., 430 F. Supp. 2d 826 (N.D. Ill. 2006).
Cook v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 75 F.R.D. 619 (W.D. Okla. 1976).
Fuller v. Temple-Inland Forest Prods. Corp., 942 F. Supp. 307 (E.D. Tex. 1996).
Bray v. Automatan, LLC, 167 F. Supp. 3d 770 (D.S.C. 2016).
Shadel v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. (W.D. Mo. 2020).
Kaspar v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2020).
Eierman v. Consol. Rail Corp., 637 F. Supp. 225 (E.D. Pa. 1984).
Consum. Crusade, Inc. v. Fairon & Assocs., Inc., 379 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (D. Colo. 2005).
Letourneau v. Gen. Motors Corp., 24 F. App'x 332 (6th Cir. 2001).
Vasquez v. Dillard's, Inc., 2016 OK 89 (Okla. 2016).
Stassi v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc (N.D. Ala. 2023).
Logan v. McKinney Drilling, LLC (S.D. Ala. 2021).
Sullivan v. Ins. Co. of North Am. (D. Del. 2022).
Corbin v. Fred Weber, Inc. (S.D. Ill. 2021).
Colyer v. Leadec Corp. (E.D. Mo. 2022).
Colyer v. Leadec Corp. (E.D. Mo. 2023).
Kaylor v. Multi-Color Corp. (S.D. Ohio 2020).
Stewart v. Lewis (W.D. Pa. 2019).
Bowens v. Sweeping Corp. of Am. LLC (N.D. Tex. 2024).
Herring v. Renewable Energy Sys. Americas,Inc. (S.D. Tex. 2021).
Baldwin v. Am. Van Lines, Inc. (E.D. Va. 2024).
Feltner v. Consol of Kentucky, Inc. (S.D.W. Va 2018).
Alderman v. ADT, LLC (S.D.W. Va 2023).
Bean (E.D. Wis. 2025).
Lockard v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 894 F.2d 299 (8th Cir. 1990).
Gonzalez v. Whelan Sec. Co., 507 F. Supp. 2d 687 (W.D. Tex. 2006).
Kelly Renee Neumann v. AT&T Commc'ns, 376 F.3d 773 (8th Cir. 2004).
Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 565 U.S. 368 (2012). “, 28 U. S.C. § 1445(a) (“A civil action in any State court against a railroad or its receivers or trustees, [arising under §§ 51-60 of Title 45,] may not be removed to any district court of the United States.”
Wiley v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 11 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2001).
Greene v. United Fruit Co., 85 F. Supp. 81 (S.D.N.Y. 1949). “In this instance the-pertinen’t statute now in effect, Title 28 U.S. C.A. § 1445(a), bars the removal from a State to a Federal court of any action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.”
Brooks v. Wireless One, Inc., 43 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (M.D. Ala. 1999).
Husk v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 842 F. Supp. 892 (S.D.W. Va 1994).
Dibble v. Grand Trunk W. R.R., 699 F. Supp. 123 (E.D. Mich. 1988).
Palser v. Burlington N. R. Co., 698 F. Supp. 793 (E.D. Mo. 1988).
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Starr Indem & Liab Ins (5th Cir. 2018).
Perrilloux v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co., 593 F. Supp. 393 (E.D. La. 1984).
Giordano v. WestRock Co. (M.D. Ala. 2020).
Mayfield v. Shelley's Elec. Serv. Inc (N.D. Ala. 2022).
Tommie Jean Shanks v. Globe Metalluroical, Inc. (S.D. Ala. 2019).
Gutierrez v. McNeilus Truck & Mfg., Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2019).
Maslic v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o. (N.D. Cal. 2021).
Moore v. KIK Int'l, LLC (M.D. Fla. 2020).
Hernandez v. Neo Pet Spa, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2023). “Plaintiff cites to binding Eleventh Circuit precedent instructing that “28 U.S.C. § 1445(c) bars the removal of claims from state court ‘arising under the workmen’s compensation laws’ of the forum state.”
Ratliff v. Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC (E.D. Ky. 2020).
Hutchins v. ANCO Insulations, Inc. (E.D. La. 2021).
Willison v. Noble Drilling Expl. Co. (E.D. La. 2022).
Ditcharo v. Union Pac. R.R. Co. (E.D. La. 2024).
Parks v. Barnes-Jewish Hosp. (E.D. Mo. 2021).
Tumlin-Piper v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc. (E.D. Mo. 2021).
Qauod-Pinales v. Costa Shipping & Delivery Inc. (E.D. Mo. 2022).
White v. Union Pac. R.R. Co. (W.D. Mo. 2019).
Dame v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co. (W.D. Mo. 2021).
Adams v. Frito-Lay, Inc. (N.D. Ohio 2020).
Wilson v. Hi-Tech STL Logistics, Inc. (S.D. Ill. 2024).
Dunbar v. Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (E.D. Mo. 2024).
Canine v. Sam's East, Inc. (S.D. Tex. 2024).
Arriola v. Marc Jones Constr., LLC (W.D. Tex. 2022).
Prince v. Prof'l Transp., Inc. (S.D.W. Va 2019).
Smith v. Guadalupe Centers, Inc. (W.D. Mo. 2025).
Peralta v. Supreme Offshore Servs., Inc. (E.D. La. 2025).
Bertel v. Elite Flowers (N.D. Tex. 2025).
In re Norfolk S. Ry. v. (8th Cir. 2010).
Calloway v. Union Pac. R. Co., 929 F. Supp. 1280 (E.D. Mo. 1996).
West v. Fina Oil & Chem. Co., 128 F. Supp. 2d 396 (E.D. Tex. 2001).
Illinois Ex Rel. Sec'y of the Dep't of Transp. v. DeLong's Inc., 57 F. Supp. 2d 639 (C.D. Ill. 1999).
Garcia v. Rainbo Baking Co. of Houston, 18 F. Supp. 2d 683 (S.D. Tex. 1997).
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Otero, 598 F.2d 627 (1st Cir. 1979).
Loftus v. Delaware & H. R. Corp., 122 F. Supp. 829 (M.D. Penn. 1954).
Clifton Park Manor, Section One, Inc. v. Mason, 137 F. Supp. 326 (D. Del. 1955).
Sf Bart v. Gen. Reinsurance Corp. (9th Cir. 2018).
Chenevert v. Constellium SE (N.D. Ala. 2022).
McCants v. BASF Corp. (S.D. Ala. 2019).
Sylvia Love v. US Foods, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2021).
Est. of Troy Tuft, The v. Indem. Ins. Co. of North Am. (D. Colo. 2019).
Smith v. Wal-Mart Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2021).
Session v. Putnam Cnty. Sheriff Dep't (M.D. Fla. 2023).
Dagon v. BNSF Ry. Co. (S.D. Ill. 2020).
Zuber v. CTS Nat'l Corp. (S.D. Ill. 2022).
Shultz v. Schneider Elec. USA, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2024).
Ledesma v. Gary Ry. Co. (N.D. Ind. 2024).
Perez v. Aquaterra Contracting, LLC (E.D. La. 2022).
Davis v. Mack (D. Minnesota 2018).
Holder v. City of Florissant (E.D. Mo. 2021).
Lenzenhuber v. Misonix, Inc. (E.D. Mo. 2023).
James v. Jackson Cnty. Missouri (W.D. Mo. 2019).
Kyles v. State of Nebraska (D. Neb. 2022).
Bey v. State of New Mexico (D.N.M. 2022).
Porter v. Cuyahoga Cnty. (N.D. Ohio 2020).
Berry v. Perdue Farms Inc (D.S.C. 2019).
SS Body Armor I, Inc (Bankr. D. Del. 2021).
Eli Ramos v. Crown Equip. Corp. (C.D. Cal. 2024).
Belanger v. McDermott, Inc. (S.D. Tex. 2019).
Donegan v. The Toro Co. (W.D. Tex. 2022).
Hall v. Gestamp West Virginia, LLC (S.D.W. Va 2020).
Dotson v. George Campbell Distributors, Inc. (S.D.W. Va 2023).
Evans v. Bronxworks, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2025).
Wagnon v. Kroger Texas, LP (N.D. Tex. 2025).
Peralta v. Supreme Offshore Servs., Inc. (E.D. La. 2025).
Engelbrecht v. Am. Claims Mgmt., Inc. (W.D. Mo. 2025).
(PS) Brown v. LucidWorks (E.D. Cal. 2025).
Haynes (N.D. Ala. 2025).
Theodore Nelson v. Textron Ground Support Equip., Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal. 2026).
Tepe (E.D. Tenn. 2026).
Jones v. C.J. Mahan Constr. Co., 393 F. Supp. 2d 390 (S.D.W. Va 2005).
Harper v. Auto All. (6th Cir. 2004).
Markel Ins. Co. v. Stcg, Inc., 737 F. Supp. 2d 626 (N.D. Tex. 2010).
Ronny L. Bryan v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 415 F.2d 314 (5th Cir. 1969).
In re: CSX Transp. v. (4th Cir. 1998).
Edmonds v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 883 F. Supp. 89 (S.D.W. Va 1995).
Kemp v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., 225 F. Supp. 250 (D. Or. 1963).
Smith v. Anadrill, Inc., 761 F. Supp. 456 (S.D. Tex. 1991).
Armstrong v. North Alabama Moving & Storage, Inc., 533 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (N.D. Ala. 2008).
Martco P'ship v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins., 86 F.3d 459 (5th Cir. 1996).
Brown v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger, 725 F. Supp. 873 (D. Maryland 1989).
Smith v. Anadrill, Inc., 762 F. Supp. 1267 (S.D. Tex. 1991).
Cashman v. Waffle House Co., 951 F. Supp. 1012 (M.D. Ala. 1997).
Pueblo Int'l, Inc. v. De Cardona, 562 F. Supp. 843 (D.P.R. 1983).
Duffel v. Union Pac. R.R., 937 F. Supp. 842 (E.D. Mo. 1995).
Rubio v. McAnally Enter., L.L.C., 374 F. Supp. 2d 1052 (D.N.M. 2005).
Hutton v. Consol. Grain & Barge Co., 170 F. Supp. 2d 844 (C.D. Ill. 2001).
Wamsley v. Tonomo Marine, Inc., 287 F. Supp. 2d 657 (S.D.W. Va 2003).
Jorge Escobar v. Celebration Cruise Operator, Inc. (11th Cir. 2014).
Baldwin Hills Med. Grp. v. Los Angeles Cnty. Metro. Transp. Auth., 196 F. App'x 567 (9th Cir. 2006).
Lackey v. Atl. Richfield Co. (5th Cir. 1993).
Reed v. Heil Co., 206 F.3d 1055 (11th Cir. 2000).
Andricola v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 745 F. Supp. 311 (E.D. Pa. 1990).
James Hefren v. Murphy Expl & Prodn Co., USA, et a (5th Cir. 2016).
James Hefren v. Murphy Expl & Prodn Co., USA, et a (5th Cir. 2016).
James Hefren v. Murphy Expl & Prodn Co., USA, et a (5th Cir. 2016).
Ronald Ward v. Soo Line R.R. Co. (7th Cir. 2018).
Ronald Ward v. Soo Line R.R. Co. (7th Cir. 2018).
Shipkovitz v. Sessions, III (D.D.C. 2019).
Gilbert Sanchez v. Enter. Offshore Drilling (5th Cir. 2020).
Jane Milligan v. Home Depot USA, Inc. (5th Cir. 2020).
Excel Pharmacy Servs. LLC v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co (3rd Cir. 2020).
Roddy v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 282 F. Supp. 3d 893 (E.D. Pa. 2017). “28 U.S.C § 1445(a). The case presents somewhat of a paradox.”
Tamra Leigh v. Joel Sacks (9th Cir. 2024).
Peters v. Liberty Bell Moving Grp. (M.D. Ala. 2019).
Mojan P. Shahsavar v. Bluemercury, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2023).
Kathryn Engles v. Premium Brands OPCO LLC (C.D. Cal. 2023).
Yates v. Eastdale Apts. Ltd. P'ship (M.D. Ala. 2022).
Nuckolls v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc (E.D. Ark. 2019).
Nuckolls v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc (W.D. Ark. 2019).
Harrell v. California State Univ. (N.D. Cal. 2023).
Harrell v. California State Univ. (N.D. Cal. 2023).
Bank of Am., Nat'l Ass'n v. German (S.D. Cal. 2019).
Stovall v. Amazon.com Servs. LLC (S.D. Cal. 2020).
Pomales v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC (D. Conn. 2019).
Valentin v. Rich Prods. Corp. (D. Conn. 2024).
Maysonet v. Mastronardi Produce USA, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2021).
Marcus v. Titan Am., LLC (M.D. Fla. 2023).
Fletcher v. United Ground Express, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2023).
United States v. Pratt (D. Idaho 2020).
Brunner v. Beltman Grp. Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2020).
Smock v. Johnson (S.D. Ill. 2020).
Neal v. Louis Dreyfus Co., LLC (S.D. Ill. 2021).
Huang v. Zhongcheng Packaging USA Inc. (D. Kan. 2021).
Matthews v. Tidewater Crewing, Ltd (E.D. La. 2023).
Ragas v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. (E.D. La. 2023).
Rawls v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. (D. Maryland 2020).
Michigan, State of v. De Leon (W.D. Mich. 2023).
People of the State of Michigan v. De Leon (W.D. Mich. 2023).
Carr v. The Am. Bottling Co. (E.D. Mo. 2021).
Smith v. MFA Oil Co. (W.D. Mo. 2021).
Holt v. Bradken, Inc. (W.D. Mo. 2022).
Morris v. Westrock Servs., LLC (W.D. Mo. 2022).
Hance v. Wood Motor Co., Inc. (W.D. Mo. 2024).
Abdel-malak v. People of the State of California (M.D.N.C. 2020).
State of New Jersey v. Jackson-bey (D.N.J. 2021).
Craytor v. Ctos, LLC (D.N.J. 2023).
Milton v. Fedex Ground Package Sys., Inc. (D. Nev. 2024).
State of Ohio v. Meade (S.D. Ohio 2022).
Jabr v. Ohio Dep't of Taxation (S.D. Ohio 2023).
Jabr v. Ohio Dep't of Taxation (S.D. Ohio 2023).
Christie v. Ingram Barge Co., LLC (M.D. Tenn. 2023).
Baker v. United Parcel Serv., Inc. (N.D. Tex. 2021).
Jennifer Scott Mixson (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2022).
Edwards v. Intermoor (5th Cir. 2024).
Bruce Besiada v. Wisconsin Cent., Ltd. (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).
Thorn v. Buffalo Rock Co. (N.D. Ala. 2024).
Harrell v. California State Univ. (N.D. Cal. 2024).
Mata v. Amazon (N.D. Ill. 2024).
Matthews v. Tidewater Crewing, Ltd (E.D. La. 2023).
Lyons v. Copperthite (D. Maryland 2024).
Johnson v. San Jacinto Coll. (S.D. Tex. 2021).
Starlight Marine Servs. Inc v. Thompson (W.D. Wash. 2020).
Taylor v. Baker (N.D. Ala. 2024).
Shead v. C-Dive, LLC (E.D. La. 2025).
Griffin v. Wellborn Cabinet Inc (N.D. Ala. 2025).
(PS) Brown v. LucidWorks (E.D. Cal. 2025).
Reynolds v. Brelin (E.D. Pa. 2025).
Schoppenhorst, Steve v. Schlutz, Bill (D. Alaska 2025).
Vincent v. Fam. Dollar Stores of Alabama Inc (N.D. Ala. 2025).
Lacambra v. TForce Freight, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2025).
Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa. 2025).
M/V Big Ben, LLC v. Antunez (S.D. Ala. 2025).
J. (M.D. Ala. 2025).
Rose (W.D. Ky. 2025).
Eskew (E.D. Ky. 2026).
Doucette (S.D. Ill. 2026).
Bloosurf, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (4th Cir. 2026).
Highline Fin. Grp., LLC, in its capacity as Highline for METCO LANDSCAPE, LLC v. Hanover Ins. Co. (D. Colo. 2026).
Eriksen v. Moore Mill & Lumber Co., 157 F. Supp. 888 (D. Or. 1958).
Stand. Accident Ins. v. Aguirre, 199 F. Supp. 918 (W.D. Tex. 1961).
Linton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. (5th Cir. 1992).
Lackey v. Atl. Richfield Co. (5th Cir. 1992).
Lackey v. Atl. Richfield Co. (5th Cir. 1992).
Lackey v. Atl. Richfield Co. (5th Cir. 1993).
Fed. Reserve Bank v. Robert R. Thomas, 220 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2000).
James Phillips v. Ford Motor Co. (8th Cir. 1996).
Hood v. Golden Poultry Co., 712 So. 2d 341 (Ala. 1998).
Carousel Nut Prods., Inc. v. Milan Express Co., 767 F. Supp. 142 (W.D. Ky. 1991).
Moak v. Illinois Cent. R.R., 807 F. Supp. 34 (M.D. La. 1992).
Whetstone v. Unitog, Inc., 960 F. Supp. 267 (N.D. Ala. 1997).
Jackson v. Diamond M. Co., 575 F. Supp. 995 (S.D. Miss. 1983).
McCoy v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.(Amtrak), 315 F. Supp. 2d 658 (E.D. Pa. 2004).
Bolton v. McWane Cast Iron & Pipe Co., 328 F. Supp. 2d 1229 (N.D. Ala. 2004).
JNB MARINE, INC. v. Stodghill, 769 F. Supp. 2d 1028 (E.D. Va. 2011).
Brooks v. Maersk Line, Ltd., 396 F. Supp. 2d 711 (E.D. Va. 2005).
Apollo Enter., Inc. & WorkingRx, Inc. v. ScripNet, Inc. (Tex. App. 2009).
Apollo Enter., Inc. & WorkingRx, Inc. v. ScripNet, Inc. (Tex. App. 2009).
Archstone-Smith Operating Trus v. Jack Katz (7th Cir. 2009).
Mindy Bloom v. Metro Heart Grp. (8th Cir. 2006).
White v. Mayflower Transit (9th Cir. 2008).
Doyle v. Tidewater Inc., 147 F. Supp. 3d 485 (E.D. La. 2015).
Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 181 L. Ed. 2d 881 (2012).
Burchett v. Cargill, Inc. (5th Cir. 1995).
Kilgo v. Petsmart, Inc (5th Cir. 2000).
Lockard v. Equifax, Inc., 163 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 1998).
Suder v. Blue Circle, Inc. (10th Cir. 1997).
Grass v. E I Dupont De Nemour (4th Cir. 1997).
Santos Ex Rel. Est. of Santos v. Durheim (In Re Durheim), 215 B.R. 876 (D. Alaska 1997).
Brenes v. United States Lines, Inc. (In Re United States Lines, Inc.), 128 B.R. 339 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).
Lydon v. Boston Sand & Gravel Co., 15 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D. Mass. 1998).
United Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. Lewis, 113 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (S.D. Miss. 2000).
Andrew Johnson v. Agco Corp. (8th Cir. 1998).
Shaw v. Gen. Elec. Co., 492 F. Supp. 779 (N.D. Ala. 1980).
Odom v. Terminal R.R., 607 F. Supp. 724 (S.D. Ill. 1985).
Toups v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., 155 F.R.D. 588 (S.D. Tex. 1994).
Sun Ins. Off., Ltd. v. Greyhound Van Lines, Inc., 289 F. Supp. 483 (D. Mass. 1968).
Cook v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 311 F. Supp. 584 (S.D. Ga. 1970).
— 28 U.S.C. § 1445(a) — 4 cases
Rosario v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 158 F. Supp. 537 (S.D.N.Y. 1957). “See 28 U.S. C.A. § 1445(a). Defendants’ petition for removal alleges that the Jones Act claim is a fraud designed to deprive this Court of jurisdiction because: (1) the Jones Act claim is not well pleaded; and, (2) plaintiffs were not in fact employees of defendants.”
Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 565 U.S. 368 (2012). “, 28 U. S.C. § 1445(a) (“A civil action in any State court against a railroad or its receivers or trustees, [arising under §§ 51-60 of Title 45,] may not be removed to any district court of the United States.”
Greene v. United Fruit Co., 85 F. Supp. 81 (S.D.N.Y. 1949). “In this instance the-pertinen’t statute now in effect, Title 28 U.S. C.A. § 1445(a), bars the removal from a State to a Federal court of any action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.”
Roddy v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 282 F. Supp. 3d 893 (E.D. Pa. 2017). “28 U.S.C § 1445(a). The case presents somewhat of a paradox.”
— 28 U.S.C. § 1445(c) — 14 cases
Derrick E. Harper v. Autoalliance Int'l, Inc., Aai Emp. Servs. Co., L.L.C., Jeffrey Kelly, & Allen Childress, 392 F.3d 195 (6th Cir. 2004). “The court further held that removal was proper notwithstanding 28 U.S.C. § 1445 (c), which prohibits the removal of a civil action “arising under the workmen’s compensation laws” of a state.”
Alabama Mun. Workers Comp. Fund, Inc. v. P.R. Diamond Prods., Inc., 234 F. Supp. 3d 1165 (N.D. Ala. 2017). “Because 28 U.S.C § 1445(c) prohibits removal of actions “arising under the workmen’s compensation laws of [a] state,” AMWCF argues, the Court must remand the case.”
Nabors v. City of Arlington, Tex., 688 F. Supp. 1165 (E.D. Tex. 1988). “28 U.S.C. § 1445(c) Plaintiff’s sole argument is that section 1445(c) mandates the remand of this case.”
Richardson v. Owens-Illinois Glass Container, Inc., 698 F. Supp. 673 (W.D. Tex. 1988). “8307c (Vernon Supp.1988). Initially, the Court notes that a civil action arising under state workmen’s compensation laws should not be removed to a district court of the United States.”
Vasquez v. Dillard's, Inc., 2016 OK 89 (Okla. 2016).
McCants v. BASF Corp. (S.D. Ala. 2019).
Hernandez v. Neo Pet Spa, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2023). “Plaintiff cites to binding Eleventh Circuit precedent instructing that “28 U.S.C. § 1445(c) bars the removal of claims from state court ‘arising under the workmen’s compensation laws’ of the forum state.”
Thorne v. WLR Foods, Inc., 111 F. Supp. 2d 744 (N.D.W. Va. 2000).
Lee v. Terex Corp. (N.D. Cal. 2023).
Tumlin-Piper v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc. (E.D. Mo. 2021).
Shadel v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. (W.D. Mo. 2020).
Smith v. MFA Oil Co. (W.D. Mo. 2021).
Alderman v. ADT, LLC (S.D.W. Va 2023).
Harper v. Auto All. (6th Cir. 2004).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.