Notes of Decisions
Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. United States, 442 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
· cites it 3× “Under 28 U.S.C. § 2632 (b), “[a] civil action in the Court of International Trade under section 515 or 516 of the Tariff Act of 1930 shall be commenced by filing with the clerk of the court a summons, with the content and in the form, manner, and style prescribed by the rules of…”
Michelin Tire Corp. v. United States, 469 F. Supp. 270 (Cust. Ct. 1979).
· cites it 7× “Plaintiff commenced this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2632 to contest the denial of its administrative protest against the assessment of countervailing duties on tires it had imported from Canada.”
Autoalliance Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 398 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005).
· cites it 3× “’s Reply at 6 n. 6.) Defendant further argues that this Court lacks jurisdiction pursuant to § 1581(f) over Count II of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint because Plaintiff failed to commence its civil action under § 1581(f) by the concurrent filing of a summons and complaint as…”
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United States, 561 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
· cites it 2× “ADM thereafter filed suit in the Court of International Trade under 28 U.S.C. § 2632 , seeking reliquidation of the entries and calculation of duties under its proposed headings.”
Washington Int'l Ins. v. United States, 138 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2001).
· cites it 2× “§ 1581 (i) jurisdiction in this ease because of Washington International’s failure to adhere to procedural requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2632 (a) and USCIT R. 3(a). Congress, in 28 U.”
Celta Agencies, Inc. v. United States, 2012 CIT 128 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
· cites it 3× “” 28 U.S.C. § 2632 (a). Neither the summons, filed on June 2, 2010, nor the complaint, filed on May 23, 2011, were filed within the two-year period beginning on June 29, 2007.”
Georgetown Steel Corp. v. The United States, 801 F.2d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 1986).
“Georgetown Steel apparently also relies upon 28 U.S.C. § 2632 (c), which provides that “[a] civil action in the Court of International Trade under section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930 shall be commenced by filing with the clerk of the court a summons or a summons and a…”
Parkdale Int'l, Ltd. v. United States, 491 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
· cites it 2× “§ 1581 (i) action, the summons and complaint for a potential § 1581(c) action should be filed together because 28 U.S.C. § 2632 (a) specifies a concurrent summons and complaint for (i) actions.”
Atari Caribe, Inc. v. United States, 799 F. Supp. 99 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992).
· cites it 2× “The legislative history to section 113 of that act ( 28 U.S.C. § 2632 (1973)) states that: Section 2632(d) retains the present authority of the court to provide by rule for consideration of any new ground in support of an action before the court if: (1) it applies to the same…”
Daewoo Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United States, 655 F. Supp. 508 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987).
· cites it 3× “Samsung and the defendant point out, however, that the rule violation which defeated the filing of the summons in NEC — the lack of “proper postage” required under Rule 5(g) — is a requirement specified in the statute that authorized the court to promulgate the rule, 28 U.S.C. §…”
— 28 U.S.C. § 2632(f) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.