U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART II— DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › Chapter CHAPTER 39— UNITED STATES TRUSTEES

28 U.S.C. § 301

INCUMBENT UNITED STATES TRUSTEES.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Area for Which Appointed.—Notwithstanding any paragraph of section 581(a) of title 28, United States Code, as in effect before the effective date of this Act, a United States trustee serving in such office on the effective date of this Act shall serve the remaining term of such office as United States trustee for the region specified in a paragraph of such section, as amended by this Act, that includes the site at which the primary official station of the United States trustee is located immediately before the effective date of this Act.“(b)Term of Office.—Notwithstanding section 581(b) of title 28, United States Code, as in effect before the effective date of this Act, the term of office of any United States trustee serving in such office on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 27, 1986] shall expire—“(1) 2 years after the expiration date of such term of office under such section, as so in effect, or“(2) 4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act,whichever occurs first.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1934–2019 · leading case: Town of Portsmouth v. Lewis, 813 F.3d 54 (1st Cir. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Portsmouth v. Lewis, 813 F.3d 54 (1st Cir. 2016). “*63 28 U.S.C. § 301 . Beginning with the first factor, the statute is phrased in terms of government activities, not protections accorded to a benefited class.”
Lefco v. United States, 74 F.2d 66 (3rd Cir. 1934). “Judicial Code, § 269 (28 USCA § 301). To avoid confusion which would be inevitable, and interminable, were we to recount each of the many acts of the ten defendants in the several offending undertakings, we shall tell the story of the case not with the particularity of the…”
Painter v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 537 F. Supp. 232 (N.D. Ga. 1982). “2d 1012 (1959); 28 U.S.C. § 301 (1966). Plaintiff then has no property interest in his former position created by statute or by formal rule.”
David L. Moss Co. v. United States, 103 F.2d 395 (C.C.P.A. 1939). · cites it 2× “, § 301 , 28 U.S. C.A. § 301, section 188, Judicial Code.”
Kreutz v. Durning, 69 F.2d 802 (2d Cir. 1934). “Code [28 USCA §§ 301, 301b]), to whieh the dissatisfied importer may appeal.”
Gonzalez v. Spunk Indus. Inc (D. Maryland 2019). “Judge Hollander referred this case to me to review the pending filings and to make recommendations, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 301 and Local Rule 301.6. ECF 31, 32.”
Bryant v. Gen. Packaging Prods., Inc., 473 F. Supp. 2d 853 (N.D. Ill. 2006). “Count VII of Bryant’s complaint alleges that the Union violated its duty of fair representation under “Section 301(a) of the [National Labor Relations Act], 28 U.S.C. § 301 .” The correct statutory citation for this section is 29 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.