28 U.S.C. § 3301
Definitions
Section effective 180 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case: United States v. Moore, 156 F. Supp. 2d 238 (D. Conn. 2001).
United States v. Moore, 156 F. Supp. 2d 238 (D. Conn. 2001). “The United States of America (“the Government”), brings this action under the Federal Debt Collections Procedures Act (“FDCPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 3301 , et seq., in connection with a restitution order entered in a previous criminal case against the pro se defendant Gary Moore.”
United States v. Schippers, 982 F. Supp. 2d 948 (S.D. Iowa 2013). “” 28 U.S.C. § 3301 (8). The definition of an “insider” includes “a relative of the debtor,” such as a spouse or family member.”
United States v. Sherrill, 626 F. Supp. 2d 1267 (M.D. Ga. 2009). “” 28 U.S.C. § 3301 (5)(A)(i). Marion’s transfers of the Stock Gap and Tanners Bridge properties to his wife clearly qualify as transfers to an insider.”
Tronox Inc. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (In re Tronox Inc.), 549 B.R. 21 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “A few weeks later, the United States filed a complaint-in-intervention, asserting claims under the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 3301 et seq. Anadarko, 2014 WL 5825308 , at *2.”
Kipperman v. Onex Corp., 411 B.R. 805 (N.D. Ga. 2009). “IN SUM Plaintiff may proceed with its constructive fraudulent transfer claims under the Management Agreement, its Preference Claims (Count XVII), its claims for Alter Ego (Count XIII) and Lender Liability (Count XVI), and its claims under 28 U.”
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'r v. Robert Escobio, 946 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 2020). “28 U.S.C. §§ 3301–3308. It was reversible error for the District Court to hold Escobio in contempt for failure to pay the money judgment.”
CFPB v. Townstone Fin., Inc., 107 F.4th 768 (7th Cir. 2024). “§ 5536 (a)(1)(A); and one count of fraudulent transfer, in violation of 28 U.S.C. §§ 3301–3308. Townstone and Mr.”
Vieira v. Gaither (In re Gaither), 595 B.R. 201 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2018). “28 USC § 3301 et seq. These sections of the FDCPA are based on the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act, 7A Pt.”
United States v. Jo Anna Bame, 721 F.3d 1025 (8th Cir. 2013). “44, and the Federal Debt Collection Procedure Act, 28 U.S.C. § 3301 et seq. Counts II and III of the complaint sought recovery under the equitable theories of money had and received, and unjust enrichment.”
Leonard v. Coolidge (In Re Nat'l Audit Def. Network), 367 B.R. 207 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2007). “”) Given the status of the Internal Revenue Service as a creditor, the Trustee could also have sought to set aside the transfers under 28 U.S.C. § 3301 , et seq., which permits avoidance of a transfer fraudulent against the United States for up to six years, id.”
Green Atlas Shipping SA v. United States, 306 F. Supp. 2d 974 (D. Or. 2003). “§ 3713 , fraudulent transfers, including violation of the fraudulent transfer provisions of the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 U.S.C. § 3301 et seq., and imposition of a constructive trust.”
United States Small Bus. Admin. v. Bensal, 853 F.3d 992 (9th Cir. 2017). “” 28 U.S.C. § 3301 (6) (emphasis added). “ ‘Asset’ means property of a debtor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.