28 U.S.C. § 605

Budget estimates

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Director, under the supervision of the Judicial Conference of the United States, shall submit to the Office of Management and Budget annual estimates of the expenditures and appropriations necessary for the maintenance and operation of the courts and the Administrative Office and the operation of the judicial survivors annuity fund, and such supplemental and deficiency estimates as may be required from time to time for the same purposes, according to law. The Director shall cause periodic examinations of the judicial survivors annuity fund to be made by an actuary, who may be an actuary employed by another department of the Government temporarily assigned for the purpose, and whose findings and recommendations shall be transmitted by the Director to the Judicial Conference.

Such estimates shall be approved, before presentation to the Office of Management and Budget, by the Judicial Conference of the United States, except that the estimate with respect to the Court of International Trade shall be approved by such court and the estimate with respect to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall be approved by such court.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1983–2019 · leading case: United States v. Gonzales

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Gonzales (1998) ca10 “§ 3006A(g)(2)(A); 28 U.S.C. § 605 ; AO Guide, chap. IV, §§ 4.”

United States v. Bogle (1988) flsd · cites it 2× “The Federal Judicial Center is to provide assistance and staffing for the Judicial Conference; develop programs of continuing education and training for judicial personnel; and develop recommendations for improvement of the administration and management of the courts.”

Joseph E.L. Sullivan v. United States (1994) ca7 “” 28 U.S.C. § 605 . We therefore think it clear that a Federal Public Defender and any full-time attorneys she appoints are officers or employees of the judicial branch for purposes of section 2671.”

Mundy v. Weinberger (1983) dcd “, 28 U.S.C. § 605 ; 31 U.S.C. § 11 (a)(5); D.”

Baisden v. West (1998) cavc “Compare 28 U.S.C. § 605 (budget estimates of federal courts are submitted to Office of Management and Budget without express prohibition of review by executive branch).”

Sparkman, Trustee v. Coley (2019) nceb “Coley and his company, East Coast Cablevision, LLC, in the amount of $2,393,000 based upon 2,393 violations of 28 U.S.C. § 605 (a) at the statutory rate of $1,000 per violation (the “Judgment”).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.