U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART VI— PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS › Chapter CHAPTER 163— FINES, PENALTIES AND FORFEITURES

28 U.S.C. § 7

Implementation and oversight enhancements

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)OMB Guidance.—Not later than February 29, 2016, not later than December 15, 2016, and December 15 of every year thereafter, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall issue guidance to agencies on implementing the inflation adjustments required under this Act.“(b)Agency Financial Reports.—The head of each agency shall include in the Agency Financial Report submitted under OMB Circular A–136, or any successor thereto, information about the civil monetary penalties within the jurisdiction of the agency, including the adjustment of the civil monetary penalties by the head of the agency under this Act.“(c)GAO Review.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall annually submit to Congress a report assessing the compliance of agencies with the inflation adjustments required under this Act, which may be included as part of another report submitted to Congress.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2010–2026 · leading case: Jonathan Walker v. Arkansas Dep't of Corr., Div. of Corr.; & Dexter Payne, in His Off. Capacity as Dir., 2026 Ark. 95 (Ark. 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jonathan Walker v. Arkansas Dep't of Corr., Div. of Corr.; & Dexter Payne, in His Off. Capacity as Dir., 2026 Ark. 95 (Ark. 2026). · cites it 2× “Further, the petition asserted that denying him contact with his husband violated the federal Respect for Marriage Act, 28 U.S.C. § 7 as well as 28 U.S.C. § 1738C(a).”
Mendez v. Schenk (N.D.N.Y. 2022). “g and is the operative pleading; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to add Cayuga County to the docket as a defendant; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's Section 1983 medical indifference claim against Cayuga County SURVIVES sua sponte review and…”
Adkins v. Limtiaco (D. Guam 2010). “” 28 U.S.C. § 7 636(b)(1)(C) (2005); see Baxter v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.