28 U.S.C. § 871
Clerk, chief deputy clerk, assistant clerk, deputies, assistants, and other employees
The Court of International Trade may appoint a clerk, a chief deputy clerk, an assistant clerk, deputy clerks, and such deputies, assistants, and other employees as may be necessary for the effective dispatch of the business of the court, who shall be subject to removal by the court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1933–1992 · leading case: Mareno v. Re, 568 F. Supp. 17 (S.D.N.Y. 1983).
Mareno v. Re, 568 F. Supp. 17 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). “” The legislative history accompanying this enactment makes it clear that Congress intended to resolve an anomaly whereby Customs Court employees, alone among members of the judicial branch, were subject to the civil service laws administered by the executive branch.”
United States v. Gregory Stuart Gordon, 974 F.2d 1110 (9th Cir. 1992). “Gordon’s arguments to the contrary are inconsistent with this court’s prior holdings regarding 28 U.S.C. § 871 , as well as section 879’s legislative history.”
Cutright v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 576 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “III 1983-1986), clerical and other *579 employees of the Court of International Trade by that court, 28 U.S.C. § 871 (1982), and official court reporters by the Judicial Conference, 28 U.”
Miller v. S. Pac. Co., 24 P.2d 380 (Utah 1933). “241, it is said: “The present statute (28 USCA §§ 871, 872; U. S. Rev. Stats., Sees.”
Garcia v. Williams, 704 F. Supp. 984 (N.D. Cal. 1988). “2d 236 (1984), for example, involving a Court of International Trade legal assistant, was premised on the finding that 28 U.S.C. § 871 expressly provides that legal assistants are "subject to removal by the court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.