Notes of Decisions
United States v. E-Gold, Ltd., 550 F. Supp. 2d 82 (D.D.C. 2008).
· cites it 11× “The only definition in the United States Code for a “money transmitting business” per se is at 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Section 5330 defines a money transmitting business as one that, inter alia, is required to report certain cash or currency transactions to the Internal Revenue…”
United States v. Talebnejad, 342 F. Supp. 2d 346 (D. Maryland 2004).
· cites it 13× “t’s charge that, from in or about December 2000 through in or about December 2002, Defendants conspired to violate the law regarding the operation of money transmitting businesses (Count I), either because the businesses were unlicensed by the State of Maryland or because…”
United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 621 F.3d 205 (2d Cir. 2010).
· cites it 4× “§ 1960 (b)(1)(A), it concluded that the government had not proved Mazza-Alaluf guilty of failing to comply with federal money transmitting registration requirements codified at 31 U.S.C. § 5330 , see 18 U.S.C. § 1960 (b)(1)(B).”
United States v. Banki, 685 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2011).
· cites it 2× “; (B) fails to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements under [ 31 U.S.C. § 5330 , which require money-transmitting businesses to register with the Secretary of the Treasury] .”
United States v. Uddin, 365 F. Supp. 2d 825 (E.D. Mich. 2005).
· cites it 7× “” Defendant does not dispute that he operated a money transmitting business nor does he dispute that the business was not registered with the Secretary of Treasury as required under 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Defendant, however, maintains that, in addition to alleging that he operated a…”
United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 607 F. Supp. 2d 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
· cites it 5× “§ 1960 and 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Section 1960 makes it a crime to “fail[ ] to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements under section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, or regulations prescribed under such section[.”
United States v. Talebnejad, 460 F.3d 563 (4th Cir. 2006).
· cites it 8× “The businesses were not licensed under Maryland law, nor were they registered pursuant to 31 U.S.C.A. § 5330 (West 2003). In UNITED STATES v.”
United States v. Murgio, 209 F. Supp. 3d 698 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).
“mx “failed to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements set forth in [ 31 U.S.C. § 5330 ] and the regulations prescribed thereunder,” in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Dimitrov, 546 F.3d 409 (7th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 2× “ness” means a money transmitting business which affects interstate or foreign commerce in any manner or degree and— (A) is intentionally operated without an appropriate money transmitting license in a State where such operation is punishable as a misdemeanor or felony under…”
Tay v. Green, 2022 OK 37 (Okla. 2022).
· cites it 2× “" The statute references 31 U.S.C. § 5330 (2018 & Supp. 2020), which defines "money transmitting business" as follows: any business other than the United States Postal Service which-- (A) provides check cashing, currency exchange, or money transmitting or remittance services, or…”
United States v. $215, 587.22 in U.S. Currency, 306 F. Supp. 3d 213 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“Section 1960(b)(1)(B) As noted above, § 1960's federal-registration offense, § 1960(b)(1)(B), defines an unlicensed money transmitting business as a "money transmitting business which affects interstate or foreign commerce" and "fails to comply with registration requirements"…”
— 31 U.S.C. § 5330(d)(1)(B) — 1 case
United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 607 F. Supp. 2d 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
“§ 1960 and 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Section 1960 makes it a crime to “fail[ ] to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements under section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, or regulations prescribed under such section[.”
— 31 U.S.C. § 5330(d)(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.