33 U.S.C. § 1402
APPLICABILITY.
“This title applies to all cruise vessels authorized to carry 500 or more passengers for hire.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2023 · leading case: Meredith v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 177 F.3d 1042 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
Meredith v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 177 F.3d 1042 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “§ 2510 (6) (person means “any employee, or agent of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof, and any individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust, or corporation”); 33 U.S.C. § 1402 (e) (person means “any private person or entity, or…”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc., & the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, as Sec'y of the Army, 524 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1975). “The applicability of this change to the dumping in this case appears doubtful, however, since it does not appear to involve dumping in the ocean, as that term is defined in 33 U.S.C. § 1402 (b). . While we agree with the district court that the discussion of alternatives in an…”
Barcelo v. Brown, 478 F. Supp. 646 (D.P.R. 1979). “” 33 U.S.C. § 1402 (f). This language, together with the legislative history of the Act, leave no doubt but that Congress intended to prohibit purposeful disposal of waste.”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Douglas M. Costle, in His Off. Capacity as Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency (Ocean Dumping), 629 F.2d 118 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “” MPRSA § 3(i), 33 U.S.C. § 1402 (i) (1976). Permit-granting authority was divided between the Administrator and the Corps “in order not to separate the responsibility for the issuance [by the Corps] of the dredging permit and the permit for disposing of the results of such…”
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Hammond, 726 F.2d 483 (9th Cir. 1984). “33 U.S.C. §§ 1402 (b), 1416(d). 7 The above authorities demonstrate a congressional intent that there be joint federal/state regulation of ocean waters within three miles of shore.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, 656 F.2d 768 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “This is evident from the definition of “dumping” in 33 U.S.C. § 1402 (f) (1976), which excludes “a disposition of any effluent from any outfall structure to the extent that such disposition is regulated under the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act .”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Callaway, 389 F. Supp. 1263 (D. Conn. 1974). “33 U.S.C. § 1402 (b) (Supp. II, 1972) ; the court does not need to determine the correctness of this contention.”
United States v. Reilly, 827 F. Supp. 1076 (D. Del. 1993). “33 U.S.C. § 1402 (c). The provisions at issue in this case are § 1411(a) and § 1415(b).”
Nat'l Sea Clammers Ass'n v. City of New York, 616 F.2d 1222 (3rd Cir. 1980). “33 U.S.C. § 1402 (b). The Act also defines “ocean waters” as “those waters of the open seas lying seaward of the base line from which the territorial sea is measured.”
Seaburn Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 712 F. Supp. 218 (D.D.C. 1989). “See 33 U.S.C. § 1402 (b), (c), (e). Under the Act, EPA may issue two types of permits: short-term “research” permits or “special” (commercial operating) permits.”
El Puente v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C. 2023). “See 33 U.S.C. §§ 1402 (b), 1411(b). The MPRSA generally prohibits the dumping of dredged material into territorial seas or ocean waters within twelve nautical miles from territorial seas without a permit, see id.”
United States v. John Hoyt Curtis, 988 F.2d 946 (9th Cir. 1993). “§ 1453 (14); Section 3(e) of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 ("MPRSA"), 33 U.S.C. § 1402 (e); Section 1401(12) of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 ("SDWA”), 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.