38 U.S.C. § 102
TELESCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY PILOT PROGRAM OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1957–2012 · leading case: Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973).
Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973). “1961 ; 38 U. S. C. § 102 (b), as amended, 86 Stat.”
Paeco, Inc., in No. 76-1495 v. Applied Moldings, Inc. & Michael R. Sigal, in No. 76-1496 v. Arlen Realty & Dev. Corp, 562 F.2d 870 (3rd Cir. 1977). “38 U.S.C. § 102 (a) provides: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless— (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent.”
Silbowitz v. Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 397 F. Supp. 862 (S.D. Fla. 1975). “” In October, 1972, Congress amended 38 U.S.C. § 102 (b) which defines the term “dependent” for the purpose of determining the amount of education assistance allowance armed forces veterans are eligible to receive.”
Gostovich v. Valore, 153 F. Supp. 826 (W.D. Pa. 1957). “Schlesinger is, of course, in conflict with 38 U.S.C.A. § 102 , which limits fees to attorneys practicing before the Veterans Administration to amounts not exceeding $10.”
Descamp Est., 175 A.2d 827 (Pa. 1961). “, passed by Congress in 1946, supersedes 38 U.S.C.A. §102 et seq., which became effective in 1936.”
Drago Gostovich v. A. Valore, Adjudication Officer, Vets. Admin., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 257 F.2d 144 (3rd Cir. 1958). “As a result of the Veterans’ Benefits Act of 1957, which became effective January 1, 1958, 38 U.S.C.A. § 102 is now 38 U.S. C.A. § 3604.”
Merlin M. Evans v. Robert C. Watson, Comm'r of Patents, 269 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1959). “§ 261 , the Veterans Administration Statute, 38 U.S. C.A. § 102, * the Department of the Interior Statute, 5 U.”
Michele D. Burden v. Eric K. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 178 (Vet. App. 2012). “38 U.S.C. § 102 (31); see also 38 U.S.C. § 101 (3) (defining "surviving spouse” for purposes of title 38 as, inter alia, "a person of the opposite sex who was a spouse of the veteran at the time of the veteran's death"); 38 C.”
Kolmes v. World Elastic Corp., 882 F. Supp. 1565 (M.D.N.C. 1994). “Defendant also alleges that Plaintiffs were not the first to invent the patented yarn, as required by 38 U.S.C. § 102 (a). However, the court has not found evidence of a prior date of invention by any other party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.