Notes of Decisions
Cited in
308
cases (
21 in the last 5 years), 1971–2026 · leading case:
Loeffler v. Frank, 486 U.S. 549 (1988).
Loeffler v. Frank, 486 U.S. 549 (1988).
· cites it 12× “In the majority's view, Congress' provision in the 1970 Postal Reorganization Act, 39 U. S. C. § 401 (1), that the Postal Service may "sue and be sued" was irrelevant to the question before it, because "a sue-and-be-sued clause does not expand the obligations of a federal entity…”
MB Fin. Grp., Inc. v. United State Postal Serv., 545 F.3d 814 (9th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 8× “The district court held that § 2680(b) barred relief on the breach of contract claim as well because it was "based on the same facts as [the] negligence claim.”
Franchise Tax Bd. v. United States Postal Serv., 467 U.S. 512 (1984).
· cites it 4× “5 The Court of Appeals rejected the Board’s argument that § 5517 did not prohibit issuance of the orders, and also rejected the argument that the provision in 39 U. S. C. § 401 (1) declaring that the Postal Service may “sue and be sued in its official name” had waived any…”
Cohen v. Postal Holdings, LLC, 873 F.3d 394 (2d Cir. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Postal Holdings therefore contended that the PRA not only waived the USPS’s sovereign -immunity, but also gave the district court jurisdiction over its Third Party Complaint.”
Gomez-Perez v. Potter, 553 U.S. 474 (2008).
· cites it 2× “On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the Postal Reorganization Act, 39 U. S. C. § 401 (1), unequivocally waived the Postal Service’s sovereign immunity, see 476 F.”
Bolger v. Youngs Drug Prods. Corp., 463 U.S. 60 (1983).
· cites it 2× “" In addition, the provision does not apply to advertisements mailed to certain recipients such as a manufacturer of contraceptives, a licensed physician, or a pharmacist.”
Milner v. Bolger, 546 F. Supp. 375 (E.D. Cal. 1982).
· cites it 10× “I The primary obstacle to the invocation of sovereign immunity by the Postal Service is the “sue and be sued” clause of 39 U.S.C. § 401 (1): The Postal Service shall have the following general powers: (1) to sue and be sued in its official name; It has long been established that…”
Michele Portmann, Doing Bus. as Grafica, an Individual v. United States, 674 F.2d 1155 (7th Cir. 1982).
· cites it 3× “To effectuate this goal, Congress clothed the Service with broad and extensive powers, including the ability “to sue and be sued in its official name,” 39 U.S.C. § 401 (1), the power “to enter into and perform contracts, execute instruments, and determine the character of, and…”
Ascom Hasler Mailing Sys., Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 815 F. Supp. 2d 148 (D.D.C. 2011).
· cites it 5× “Rather, the applicable waiver of sovereign immunity is the Postal Reorganization Act itself, which waives the immunity of USPS by giving it the power “to sue and be used in its official name.”
Dolan v. United States Postal Serv., 546 U.S. 481 (2006).
“The FTCA, in turn, waives sovereign immunity in two different sections of the United States Code. The first confers federal-court jurisdiction in a defined category of cases involving negligence committed by federal employees in the course of their employment.”
39 U.S.C. § 401(1): 2 cases
39 U.S.C. § 401(2): 1 case
39 U.S.C. § 401(3): 1 case
39 U.S.C. § 401(9): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.