4 U.S.C. § 101

Oath by members of legislatures and officers

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 4 CasesGoogle Scholar

Every member of a State legislature, and every executive and judicial officer of a State, shall, before he proceeds to execute the duties of his office, take an oath in the following form, to wit: “I, A B, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1956–2026 · leading case: Citizens in Charge, Inc. v. Jon Husted, 810 F.3d 437 (6th Cir. 2016).
Citizens in Charge, Inc. v. Jon Husted, 810 F.3d 437 (6th Cir. 2016). “That is not a recipe for good government or for encouraging public officials to act independently. None of this should be taken to mean that state officials must enforce duly enacted statutes.”
Michael Taylor v. Lee M. Spaziano, 251 F. App'x 616 (11th Cir. 2007). “The district court also instructed appellants to omit all claims against Judge MacKinnon and any claims the district court had dismissed without leave to amend (namely, the Truth In Lending Act and fraud claims and the claim asserting a violation of 4 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 102).…”
David R. Ruiz, United States of Am., Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., 679 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir. 1982). “3; 4 U.S.C. § 101 ; Connell v. Higginbotham, 403 U.”
In Re Sibley, 564 F.3d 1335 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “The United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida rejected Sibley's argument that 4 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 102 imposed oath of office obligations that the Referee and justices did not fulfill.”
Charles T. Henderson, Jr., George Truitt Robbins & John B. Dees v. United States, 237 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1956). “State officers do not stand in the same relation to the United States as if they were private citizens, or were officers of a foreign sovereignty.”
Pandey v. Russell, II, 445 F. App'x 56 (10th Cir. 2011). “§ 1359,” “4 U.S.C. § 101,” “4 U.S.C. § 102,” “28 U.”
Browder v. City of Montgomery, Alabama, 146 F. Supp. 127 (M.D. Ala. 1956). “Article VI, Clause 3, of the Constitution; 4 U.S.C.A. § 101 ; Charles T. Henderson v.”
Burdette v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 487 So. 2d 944 (Ala. Civ. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “The argument he makes on appeal is that certain individuals who actively participated in arriving at the final assessments lacked the authority to assess tax liability against him, because they did not take and subscribe to an oath pursuant to Ala.”
Trohimovich v. State, 952 P.2d 192 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3× “Trohimovich challenges this court’s jurisdiction based upon 4 U.S.C. § 101 and § 102 (1947). Federal law requires state legislators, executives, and judicial officers to take an oath, swearing or affirming to support the Constitution of the United States.”
James Heyward v. Diana Moreland (11th Cir. 2026). · cites it 3× “1 See 4 U.S.C. § 101 . His complaint included four “causes of action,” each predicated on Moreland’s “impersonation” of a judge.”
Livesay v. Murphy (D.N.J. 2022). · cites it 2× “However, oath requirements for certain state officials under 4 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 102 do not create a private cause of action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.