Notes of Decisions
Cited in
14
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 2007–2022 · leading case:
Swenson v. Nickaboine, 793 N.W.2d 738 (Minn. 2011).
Swenson v. Nickaboine, 793 N.W.2d 738 (Minn. 2011).
· cites it 7× “The judge discussed two potential sources of state jurisdiction: 40 U.S.C. § 3172 (2006) and Public Law 280, see Pub.”
United States v. Washington, 596 U.S. 832 (2022).
· cites it 5× “The District Court concluded that the law was constitutional because it fell within the scope of a federal waiver of immunity contained in 40 U. S. C. §3172 . The Ninth Circuit affirmed.”
Balderrama v. Pride Indus., Inc., 963 F. Supp. 2d 646 (W.D. Tex. 2013).
· cites it 14× “However, with respect to the TWCA, which was enacted in 1913, the analysis is altered by a federal statute, codified at 40 U.S.C. § 3172 (previously codified at 40 U.”
United States v. State of Washington, 994 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2020).
· cites it 6× “The panel held that HB 1723 fell within the waiver of 40 U.S.C. § 3172 , which authorizes States to apply their workers’ compensation laws to federal lands and projects in * The Honorable James Donato, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting…”
State ex rel. Workforce Saf. & Ins. v. JFK Raingutters, 2007 ND 80, 733 N.W.2d 248.
· cites it 4× “— The state authority charged with enforcing and requiring compliance with the state workers’ compensation laws and with the orders, decisions, and awards of the authority may apply the laws to all land and premises in the State which the Federal Government owns or holds by deed…”
Kennicott v. Sandia Corp., 314 F. Supp. 3d 1142 (D.N.M. 2018).
“§ 457 ; workers' compensation, 40 U.S.C. § 3172 ; unemployment compensation, *1165 26 U.”
United States v. State of Washington, No. 19-35673 (9th Cir. Apr. 15, 2021).
· cites it 19× “The panel held that HB 1723 fell within the waiver of 40 U.S.C. § 3172 , which authorizes states to apply their workers’ compensation laws to federal lands and projects in the states in the same way as if the premises were under the exclusive jurisdiction of the states.”
Robidoux v. Muholland, 733 F. Supp. 2d 198 (D. Mass. 2010).
· cites it 2× “40 U.S.C. § 3172 , however, makes clear that Congress intended that federal property within a state should be treated as property of that state for the purposes of applying workers’ compensation laws.”
Albers v. Yarbrough World Solutions, LLC, No. 5:19-cv-05896, 2020 WL 2218964 (N.D. Cal. May 7, 2020).
· cites it 3× “22 Plaintiff cites to 40 U.S.C. § 3172 and 26 U.S.C. § 3305 (d) to support his argument that 23 California law applies to the Presidio.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.