U.S. Code » Title 40 » Subtitle SUBTITLE I— FEDERAL PROPERTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES › Chapter CHAPTER 5— PROPERTY MANAGEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER VI— MOTOR VEHICLE POOLS AND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

40 U.S.C. § 606

Regulations related to operation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 40 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)In General.—The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe regulations to govern executive agencies in authorizing civilian personnel to operate Federal Government-owned motor vehicles for official purposes within the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the territories and possessions of the United States.(b)Elements of the Regulations.—The regulations shall prescribe standards of physical fitness for authorized operators. The regulations may require operators and prospective operators to obtain state and local licenses or permits that are required to operate similar vehicles for other than official purposes.(c)Agency Orders.—The head of each executive agency shall issue orders and directives necessary for compliance with the regulations. The orders and directives shall provide for—(1) periodically testing the physical fitness of operators and prospective operators; and(2) suspension and revocation of authority to operate.(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1123.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

606

40:491(j).

June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title II, § 211(j), as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, § 5(c), 64 Stat. 583; Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1211, § 2, 68 Stat. 1128; Pub. L. 86–624, § 27(b), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 418.

In subsection (a), the words “Director of the Office of Personnel Management” are substituted for “United States Civil Service Commission” in section 211(j) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 because of section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1978 (eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 92 Stat. 3783). The words “territories and” are added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1962–2018 · leading case: John W. Merriam v. Robert L. Kunzig, Adm'r, Gen. Servs. Admin., 476 F.2d 1233 (3rd Cir. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
John W. Merriam v. Robert L. Kunzig, Adm'r, Gen. Servs. Admin., 476 F.2d 1233 (3rd Cir. 1973). · cites it 2× “40 U.S.C. § 606 (a). This provision made no reference to leases on buildings to be constructed.”
Realty Income Trust v. Eckerd, 564 F.2d 447 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “40 U.S.C. § 606 (a). It reads in part: (a) In order to insure the equitable distribution of public buildings throughout the United States with due regard for the comparative urgency of need for such buildings .”
Concerned Residents of Buck Hill Falls, by Its Tr. Ad Litem v. Kenneth Grant, as Adm'r, 537 F.2d 29 (3rd Cir. 1976). “§ 701a et seq. In each of those cases the courts refused to examine cost/benefit analyses prepared by the Corps of Engineers because Congress had specifically authorized the projects in question after receiving and reviewing the reports.”
Springfield Parcel C, LLC v. United States, 124 Fed. Cl. 163 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “480 (initially codified at 40 U.S.C. § 606 ). Application of Section 7 to lease actions was added as part of the Public Buildings Amendments of 1972.”
Jerry Maiatico & Matomic Operating Co. v. United States, 302 F.2d 880 (D.C. Cir. 1962). · cites it 2× “” Appellants countered that the Government had no authority to acquire the building for it had not obtained approval so to do “from the Committees on Public Works of the Senate and House of Representatives as it is required to do by the Independent Offices Appropriation Act,…”
Northland Equities, Inc. v. Gateway Ctr. Corp., 441 F. Supp. 259 (E.D. Pa. 1977). “92-313, 40 U.S.C. § 606 ; 41 C.F.R. § 1-1-403 ; 4 C.”
United States v. Bedford Assocs., 657 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir. 1981). · cites it 2× “And § 7(a) of the Public Buildings Act of 1959, 40 U.S.C. § 606 (a)(1976), requires GSA to submit proposed leases requiring an annual rent in excess of $500,000 to the Public Works Committees of both Houses of Congress for their approval.”
L.S.S. Leasing Corp. v. United States Gen. Servs. Admimistration, 579 F. Supp. 1565 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). “(1976), and with its own administrative procedures as outlined in the Public Buildings Act of 1959 (“PBA”), 40 U.S.C. § 606 (1976). Before the Court is a motion in which the plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction barring the defendants from proceeding with the planning and…”
United States v. Bedford Assocs., 618 F.2d 904 (2d Cir. 1980). “Under 40 U.S.C. § 606 (a) (1976), the approval of the Committee on Public Works of each House of Congress is required prior to execution by the government of any lease for space at an average annual rental in excess of $500,000.”
Globe, Inc. v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd., 471 F. Supp. 1103 (D.D.C. 1979). “40 U.S.C. § 606 (a). As a requisite to such approval, the Administrator is required to: “transmit to Congress a prospectus of the proposed project .”
Comm. Resolutions Under 40 U.S.C. § 3307(a) & the Availability of Enacted Appropriations (OLC 2018). · cites it 3× “§ 3307 (a) Committee on Public Works of the Senate and House of Representatives”) (codified at 40 U.S.C. § 606 (a) (1964)). Indeed, Rehnquist himself later found his reasoning “equally applicable” to the “Public Buildings Act of 1959, 40 U.”
CESC v. Dept of Com. (4th Cir. 2000). “§ 253a, and the Public Buildings Act, 40 U.S.C. § 606 . The district court concluded that no such violations had occurred, and it granted summary judgment to the Government.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.