U.S. Code » Title 41 » Subtitle Subtitle III— Contract Disputes › Chapter CHAPTER 71— CONTRACT DISPUTES

41 U.S.C. § 7108

Payment of claims

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 41 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Judgments.—Any judgment against the Federal Government on a claim under this chapter shall be paid promptly in accordance with the procedures provided by section 1304 of title 31.(b)Monetary Awards.—Any monetary award to a contractor by an agency board shall be paid promptly in accordance with the procedures contained in subsection (a).(c)Reimbursement.—Payments made pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) shall be reimbursed to the fund provided by section 1304 of title 31 by the agency whose appropriations were used for the contract out of available amounts or by obtaining additional appropriations for purposes of reimbursement.(d)Tennessee Valley Authority.—(1)Judgments.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) to (c), any judgment against the Tennessee Valley Authority on a claim under this chapter shall be paid promptly in accordance with section 9(b) of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 (16 U.S.C. 831h(b)).(2)Monetary awards.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) to (c), any monetary award to a contractor by the board of contract appeals of the Tennessee Valley Authority shall be paid in accordance with section 9(b) of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 (16 U.S.C. 831h(b)).(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3825.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

7108

41:612.

Pub. L. 95–563, § 13, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2389; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, § 4322(b)(7), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 677.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case: Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter, 132 S. Ct. 2181 (2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter, 132 S. Ct. 2181 (2012). · cites it 2× “§§450m–1(a), (d), and judgments against the Government under that Act are payable from the Judgment Fund, 41 U. S. C. §7108 (a).9 Indeed, we cited the Contract Disputes Act, Judgment Fund, and Anti-Deficiency Act in Cherokee Nation, ex- plaining that if the Government commits…”
Bowers Inv. Co., LLC v. United States, 695 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “Discussion Claims arising from a contract with the federal government must first be submitted to the contracting officer, 41 U.S.C. § 7108 (a)(1), and the contracting officer’s decision may be appealed to either the appropriate board of contract appeals or the Court of Federal…”
Rosa D. Bonewell v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 129 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “And, judgments against the federal government on CDA claims are payable from the Judgment Fund, 41 U.S.C. § 7108 (a) (2012) (citing 31 U.”
Nwogu v. United States, 497 F. App'x 952 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “§§ 612 (a) and (b) (now codified at 41 U.S.C. §§ 7108 , effective Jan. 4, 2011), as mandating payment of money by the United States government *895 and thus providing jurisdiction under the Tucker Act.”
Mattox v. Debt Collectors Int'l (W.D. Wash. 2024). · cites it 3× “§ 1920 (Taxation of 19 costs) and 41 U.S.C. § 7108 , formerly cited as 41 U.”
Mattox v. Debt Collectors Int'l (W.D. Wash. 2024). “20 In the “service order judgment bill” filed by Mattox on September 27, 2024, she seems to 21 allege that Defendants owe her $19,0000,000.”
Skanska USA Bldg., Inc. (A.S.B.C.A. 2014). “§ 1304 pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7108 (b). Accordingly, it is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.