U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 117— ENCOURAGING GOOD FAITH PROFESSIONAL REVIEW ACTIVITIES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— REPORTING OF INFORMATION

42 U.S.C. § 11132

Reporting of sanctions taken by Boards of Medical Examiners

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In general(1) Actions subject to reportingEach Board of Medical Examiners—(A) which revokes or suspends (or otherwise restricts) a physician’s license or censures, reprimands, or places on probation a physician, for reasons relating to the physician’s professional competence or professional conduct, or(B) to which a physician’s license is surrendered,shall report, in accordance with section 11134 of this title, the information described in paragraph (2).(2) Information to be reportedThe information to be reported under paragraph (1) is—(A) the name of the physician involved,(B) a description of the acts or omissions or other reasons (if known) for the revocation, suspension, or surrender of license, and(C) such other information respecting the circumstances of the action or surrender as the Secretary deems appropriate.(b) Failure to report

If, after notice of noncompliance and providing opportunity to correct noncompliance, the Secretary determines that a Board of Medical Examiners has failed to report information in accordance with subsection (a), the Secretary shall designate another qualified entity for the reporting of information under section 11133 of this title.

(Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, § 422, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3789.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Mem'l Hosp.-The Woodlands v. McCown, 927 S.W.2d 1 (Tex. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mem'l Hosp.-The Woodlands v. McCown, 927 S.W.2d 1 (Tex. 1996). “The federal Act establishes a nationwide reporting system that extends not only to the revocation, suspension or surrender of a physician’s license, 42 U.S.C. § 11132 , but also to a denial of an application for clinical privileges.”
Pierson v. Orlando Reg'l Healthcare Sys., Inc., 619 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (M.D. Fla. 2009). “42 U.S.C. § 11132 (a). In addition to requiring reporting of information, HCQIA also requires hospitals to obtain information; any time a physician applies for clinical privileges at a hospital or to be on the hospital’s medical staff, and once every 2 years with regard to…”
Smith v. Iowa Bd. of Med. Examiners, 729 N.W.2d 822 (Iowa 2007). “42 U.S.C. § 11132 . The appellate record contains no information, other than what is contained in the district court’s ruling, as to what, when, where, and to whom the Board may have disseminated or intended to disseminate the November 16, 2001, denial of Smith’s license.”
Patrick v. Floyd Med. Ctr., 565 S.E.2d 491 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). “Under the national reporting system, insurance companies are required to report medical malpractice payments to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 42 USC § 11131 ; boards of medical examiners are required to report sanctions imposed against physicians, 42 USC § 11132 ;…”
Yost v. State, Div. of Corporations, Bus. & Prof'l Licensing, 234 P.3d 1264 (Alaska 2010). “42 U.S.C. § 11132 ; 45 C.F.R. § 60.8 ; AS 08.”
Doe v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 871 F. Supp. 808 (E.D. Pa. 1994). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 11132 (a)(1) The report to the Data Bank is to include the name of the physician, a description of the acts or omissions which caused the licensure act, and such other information as appropriate.”
Holland v. Muscatine Gen. Hosp., 971 F. Supp. 385 (S.D. Iowa 1997). “42 U.S.C. §§ 11132 (a), 11133(a). The information reported is confidential.”
Davidson v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Med., 562 A.2d 109 (D.C. 1989). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 11132 , 11134 (1988 Supp.) (effective November 4, 1987) (requiring state boards of medicine to report disciplinary actions to central national data bank).”
Goldsmith v. Harding Hosp., Inc., 762 F. Supp. 187 (S.D. Ohio 1991). “Under 42 U.S.C. §§ 11132 to 11134, health care entities and medical boards are required to report certain adverse actions taken by those entities in regard to a physician to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
Imperial v. Suburban Hosp. Ass'n, 37 F.3d 1026 (4th Cir. 1994). “§ 11131 ; boards of medical examiners are required to report sanctions imposed against physicians, 42 U.S.C. § 11132 ; and health care entities are required to report adverse professional review information, 42 U.”
Janes v. Centegra Health Sys., 721 N.E.2d 702 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 11132 (West 1995). Thus, NIMC may report the incident concerning Dr.”
Davenport v. Ne. Georgia Med. Ctr., Inc., 515 S.E.2d 162 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “It creates a national reporting system which requires insurance companies to report medical malpractice payments, 42 USC § 11131 , boards of medical examiners to report sanctions imposed against physicians, 42 USC § 11132 , and hospitals to report adverse professional peer…”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.