U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 117— ENCOURAGING GOOD FAITH PROFESSIONAL REVIEW ACTIVITIES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— REPORTING OF INFORMATION

42 U.S.C. § 11136

Disclosure and correction of information

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
With respect to the information reported to the Secretary (or the agency designated under section 11134(b) of this title) under this subchapter respecting a physician or other licensed health care practitioner, the Secretary shall, by regulation, provide for—(1) disclosure of the information, upon request, to the physician or practitioner, and(2) procedures in the case of disputed accuracy of the information.(Pub. L. 99–660, title IV, § 426, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3791.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Doe v. Leavitt, 552 F.3d 75 (1st Cir. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Doe v. Leavitt, 552 F.3d 75 (1st Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “, 42 U.S.C. § 11136 . Withal, the Secretary has not exercised this rulemaking authority to set forth his interpretation of the word “investigation.”
Doe v. Thompson, 332 F. Supp. 2d 124 (D.D.C. 2004). · cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. § 11136 . Therefore, it appears that the HCQIA is simply not as comprehensive as the Privacy Act when records become the subject of a dispute.”
Pierson v. Orlando Reg'l Healthcare Sys., Inc., 619 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (M.D. Fla. 2009). “” 42 U.S.C. § 11136 . HCQIA further provides *1291 that '‘[t]he Secretary .”
Simpkins v. Shalala, 999 F. Supp. 106 (D.D.C. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 11136 (2). Pursuant to this requirement, HHS issued 45 C.”
Straznicky v. Desert Springs Hosp., 642 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (D. Nev. 2009). “42 U.S.C. § 11136 (2). The Secretary has promulgated this procedure by regulation at 45 C.”
Shean Satgunam v. Michigan State Univ., 556 F. App'x 456 (6th Cir. 2014). “The district court, however, declined to enter preliminary injunctive relief removing the report, finding that administrative exhaustion applied to the question of whether MSU is eligible to file its report with the Data Bank.”
Breda v. McDonald, 153 F. Supp. 3d 496 (D. Mass. 2015). “42 U.S.C. § 11136 . Under the applicable regulations, a party like Dr, Breda must first attempt to resolve the dispute with the reporting entity.”
Miller v. Huron Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 145 F. Supp. 3d 873 (D.S.D. 2015). · cites it 2× “HRMC also submits that summary judgment is appropriate because Dr. Miller did not challenge the accuracy of the Adverse Action Report with the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services before filing suit.”
Rogers v. Columbia/HCA of Cent. Louisiana, Inc., 961 F. Supp. 960 (W.D. La. 1997). “42 U.S.C. § 11136 ; 45 C.F.R. § 60.14 . La.”
Leal v. Sec'y, Us Dept. of Hhs, 620 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2010). “42 U.S.C. § 11136 (2). Under those regulations, a physician who disputes the accuracy of a report can seek Secretarial review, see 45 C.”
Leal v. Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 620 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2010). “42 U.S.C. § 11136 (2). Under those regulations, a physician who disputes the accuracy of a report can seek Secretarial review, see 45 C.”
Long v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (D.D.C. 2019). · cites it 2× “21(c)(1); see also 42 U.S.C. § 11136 (2) (requiring HHS to establish “procedures in the case of disputed accuracy of the information”).”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.