42 U.S.C. § 15329

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2010–2012 · leading case: Jesus Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 677 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2012).
Jesus Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 677 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “134 (1944), Arizona argues that Congress did not delegate any authority to the EAC to interpret the NVRA, see 42 U.S.C. § 15329 , and thus deference is not appropriate.”
Maria Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 624 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “The Commission can’t write many regula- tions, 42 U.S.C. § 15329 , can’t enforce the NVRA or the regulations it writes, id.”
Gonzalez v. Arizona, 649 F.3d 953 (9th Cir. 2010). “would nullify the NVRA's procedure for soliciting state input, and aggrandize the states' role in direct contravention of the lines of authority prescribed by Section 7.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.