42 U.S.C. § 15607

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2014–2024 · leading case: West Virginia Reg'l Jail & Corr. Facility Auth. v. A.B., 766 S.E.2d 751 (W. Va. 2014).
West Virginia Reg'l Jail & Corr. Facility Auth. v. A.B., 766 S.E.2d 751 (W. Va. 2014). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 15607 (“Adoption and effect of national standards”).”
Watts v. Commonwealth, 8 N.E.3d 717 (Mass. 2014). “” 42 U.S.C. § 15607 (c)(2)(B) (2006). The petitioners do not contest that, as of the effective date of the act, the act achieves compliance with the national standards.”
United States v. D.W., 198 F. Supp. 3d 18 (E.D.N.Y 2016). “§ 115 (2012); 42 U.S.C. § 15607 . The rules address, among other issues: supervision and monitoring to protect inmates against sexual abuse; training of staff “on key topics related to preventing, detecting, and responding to sexual abuse;” the screening of inmates “for [the]…”
Maryland Attorney Gen. Opinion 99OAG003 (Md. Att'y Gen. 2014). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 15607 (e)(2)(A) (requiring certifi- cation); 28 C.”
Slaikeu v. Alaska Dept. of Corr. (D. Alaska 2023). “See 42 U.S.C. § 15607 (e) (explicitly directing the Attorney General to enforce compliance with the PREA); see also Sandoval, 532 U.”
(PC) Haynie v. Esquerra (E.D. Cal. 2022). “42 U.S.C. § 15607 . 1 | will direct the Clerk of Court to provide a copy of this Order and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 2 | to the Warden at Corcoran State Prison and Mule State Prison for investigation, if any, as they 3 | deem appropriate.”
(PC) Parker v. Sgt. Garcia (E.D. Cal. 2024). “” Hatcher, 2015 WL 474313 , at *5; 25 see 42 U.S.C. § 15607 (e) (explicitly directing the Attorney General to enforce compliance with 26 the PREA); Alexander, 532 U.”
Adger v. Coupe (D. Del. 2020). “§ 1983 for Conspiracy; (III) Violation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 15607 ; (IV) Intentional or Reckless Infliction of Emotional Distress; and (V) Failure to Properly Train, Monitor, Supervise, or Discipline.”
Hale v. Pounds (D. Idaho 2019). “42 U.S.C. § 15607 . Many courts have examined this issue and have decided that nothing in the PREA explicitly or implicitly suggests that Congress intended to create a private right of action for inmates to sue prison officials for noncompliance with the Act.”
Bailey v. Einerson (D. Alaska 2024). “31 See 42 U.S.C. § 15607 (e) (explicitly directing the Attorney General to enforce compliance with the PREA); Alexander v.”
W. Va. Reg'l Jail & Corr. Facility Auth. v. A.B. (W. Va. 2014). “42 U.S.C. § 15607 (“Adoption and effect of national standards”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.