42 U.S.C. § 2131
License required
It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 2121 of this title, for any person within the United States to transfer or receive in interstate commerce, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, possess, use, import, or export any utilization or production facility except under and in accordance with a license issued by the Commission pursuant to section 2133 or 2134 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2025 · leading case: Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting Council, 942 A.2d 345 (Conn. 2008).
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting Council, 942 A.2d 345 (Conn. 2008). “2d 443 (1984); see also 42 U.S.C. §§ 2131 , 2133 (setting forth licensing provisions).”
Nuclear Transp. & Storage, Inc. v. United States, 890 F.2d 1348 (6th Cir. 1989). “The license is required by and granted pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 2131 (1982), 1 to store unenriched uranium hexaflouride (nuclear feed material).”
United States v. Del Percio, 870 F.2d 1090 (6th Cir. 1989). “§ 1001 (1982), and certain provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2131 , 2272 and 2273(a) (1982), in connection with their failure to comply with certain fire safety regulations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”).”
AmerGen Energy Co. Ex Rel. Exelon Generation Co. v. United States, 779 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “See 42 U.S.C. § 2131 . Amer-Gen applied for and obtained the NRC’s approval of the transfer of the plants’ operating licenses.”
United States v. Del Percio, 657 F. Supp. 849 (W.D. Mich. 1987). “48 (c)(5) and (6), constitutes a willful violation, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2131 and 2272, of the licenses issued to IMECo for Units 1 and 2 of the D.”
United States v. Bucheit, 134 F. App'x 842 (6th Cir. 2005). “2d at 1095-97 (finding alleged failure to submit plans and schedules for making nuclear power plant modifications and to implement such modifications in accordance with prescribed timetable in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 2131 , 2272, and 2273(a) were not continuing offenses, thus…”
Drake v. Detroit Edison Co., 443 F. Supp. 833 (W.D. Mich. 1978). “Plaintiffs contend that the sale amounts to an acquisition of a nuclear facility by the co-ops 1 without a license and an amendment to Edison’s construction permit prior to NRC approval, in violation of §§ 101 and 184 of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2131 ,…”
People's Couns. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 270 A.2d 105 (Md. 1970). “42 U.S.C. §§ 2131 and 2235 require the obtaining from AEC of a construction permit before construction of a nuclear electric generating facility is begun.”
Nextera Energy, Inc. v. United States, 893 F.3d 1353 (11th Cir. 2018). “42 U.S.C. § 2131 . Those licensed to run nuclear power plants must adhere to strict regulatory guidelines promulgated by the NRC.”
Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 667 F.2d 908 (10th Cir. 1981). “' The AEC (NRC) has comprehensive powers to punish and prohibit practices it regards as improper, through its power and responsibility to license, 42 U.S.C. § 2131 , investigate, id. § 2271, enjoin, id.”
Gage v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 356 F. Supp. 80 (N.D. Ill. 1972). “Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2131 and 2133, Edison must obtain the AEC’s approval of its project.”
Nader v. Ray, 363 F. Supp. 946 (D.D.C. 1973). “42 U.S.C. § 2131 . 7. The General Electric Company (“GE”) filed a timely motion to intervene as a defendant as of right under Fed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.