42 U.S.C. § 294

General provisions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Collaboration

To be eligible to receive assistance under this part, an academic institution shall use such assistance in collaboration with 2 or more disciplines.

(b) ActivitiesAn entity shall use assistance under this part to carry out innovative demonstration projects for strategic workforce supplementation activities as needed to meet national goals for interdisciplinary, community-based linkages. Such assistance may be used consistent with this part—(1) to develop and support training programs;(2) for faculty development;(3) for model demonstration programs;(4) for the provision of stipends for fellowship trainees;(5) to provide technical assistance; and(6) for other activities that will produce outcomes consistent with the purposes of this part.(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, § 750, as added Pub. L. 105–392, title I, § 103, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3541.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 294, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, § 761, as added Pub. L. 102–408, title I, § 102, Oct. 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 2045; amended Pub. L. 103–43, title XX, § 2014(e), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 217, authorized grants for traineeships in health professions fields experiencing severe shortages of health professionals, prior to the general amendment of this part by Pub. L. 105–392.

Another prior section 294, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, § 727, as added Oct. 12, 1976, Pub. L. 94–484, title IV, § 401(b)(3), 90 Stat. 2257; amended Dec. 19, 1977, Pub. L. 95–215, § 4(e)(1), 91 Stat. 1506, stated purpose of and authorized appropriations for Federal program of student loan insurance, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 102–408. See sections 292 and 292p of this title.

Another prior section 294, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, § 740, as added Sept. 24, 1963, Pub. L. 88–129, § 2(b), 77 Stat. 170; amended Oct. 13, 1964, Pub. L. 88–654, § 1(a), (b), 78 Stat. 1086; Oct. 22, 1965, Pub. L. 89–290, §§ 2(b), 4(a), (f)(1), (2), 79 Stat. 1056 to 1058; Nov. 2, 1966, Pub. L. 89–709, § 3(a), (b), 80 Stat. 1103; Nov. 3, 1966, Pub. L. 89–751, § 5(c)(1), 80 Stat. 1232; Aug. 16, 1968, Pub. L. 90–490, title I § 121(a)(1), (2), (5)(B), 82 Stat. 777, 778; Nov. 18, 1971, Pub. L. 92–157, title I, § 105(e)(1), (4), (f)(2), 85 Stat. 451; Aug. 23, 1974, Pub. L. 93–385, § 2(b), 88 Stat. 741; Apr. 22, 1976, Pub. L. 94–278, title XI, 1105(b), 90 Stat. 416; Oct. 12, 1976, Pub. L. 94–484, title IV, § 402, 90 Stat. 2266, which related to loan agreements for the establishment of student loan funds, was transferred to section 294m of this title.

A prior section 750 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 293n of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–392.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases, 1980–2007 · leading case: Hines v. United States (In Re Hines), 63 B.R. 731 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1986).
Hines v. United States (In Re Hines), 63 B.R. 731 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1986). · cites it 2× “During his fall semester term at the University of South Dakota Medical School, the debtor applied for and received a $5,000 loan from the Chase Manhattan Bank pursuant to the Health Education Assistance *733 Loan program (HEAL) ( 42 U.S.C. § 294 ). 1 The debtor, who was in his…”
In Re Owens, 82 B.R. 960 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1988). · cites it 4× “S.C. § 294f(g). Section 294%) provides that education loans are dischargeable in cases under Title 11 only in certain very narrowly defined circumstances.”
In the Matter of Frederick G. Johnson & Vallera J. Johnson, A/k/a, Vallera K. Joyner, Debtors-Appellants, 787 F.2d 1179 (7th Cir. 1986). “Section 294f(g) provides that an HEAL loan is not dischargeable unless three conditions are met: (g) A debt which is a loan insured under the authority of this subpart may be released by a discharge in bankruptcy under Title 11, United States Code, 11 U.”
Soler v. United States Ex Rel. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In Re Soler), 261 B.R. 444 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2001). “This section was formerly codified at 42 U.S.C. § 294 . 14 . I intend no criticism of WHEAB.”
In Re Malloy, 155 B.R. 940 (E.D. Va. 1993). “for Health Education Assistance Loans (“HEAL”) under 42 U.S.C. § 294 %), recodified at 42 U.S.”
United States v. Hampton (In Re Hampton), 47 B.R. 47 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1985). “42 U.S.C. § 294 . The debtor obtained a H.”
Kline v. United States, 155 B.R. 762 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1993). “The issue at trial was whether nondischarge of Debt- or’s HEAL loans would be unconscionable under 42 U.S.C. § 294 %) due to Debtor’s mental and emotional disabilities which impair her ability to function and to earn a living.”
United States v. Cleveland (In Re Cleveland), 89 B.R. 69 (9th Cir. BAP 1988). “Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 294 , such loans are fully insured by the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) (the appellee in this case) in the event of default or bankruptcy.”
United States v. Dunevitz (In Re Dunevitz), 94 B.R. 190 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1988). · cites it 3× “The issue presented is whether or not the discharge of a HEAL loan made pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 294 , is governed by the provisions of 11 U.”
Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. Johnson, 45 B.R. 885 (N.D. Ill. 1985). · cites it 2× “The Health Education Assistance Loan program is authorized by 42 U.S.C. § 294 and provides guarantees by the Department of Health and Human Services in the event of bankruptcy or default on loans made by private lenders to students in the health professions.”
Bd. of Trs. v. Bruce (In Re Bruce), 3 B.R. 77 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1980). “) Health Professions Educational Assistance Act of 1976 ( 42 U.S.C. § 294 et seq.) Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.”
Soler v. United States Ex Rel. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In Re Soler), 250 B.R. 694 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2000). “§ 523 (a)(8) and 42 U.S.C. § 294 (g). She has withdrawn her original plan but in this adversary proceeding suggests that she will propose a Chapter 13 plan which would include five years of $1,400 monthly payments for a total of $84,000, virtually all of which would be paid to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.