42 U.S.C. § 300z
Findings and purposes
1984—Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 98–512, § 2(b), struck out reference relating to developmental disabilities and inserted provision relating to importance of education, training, and job research services for adolescent parents.
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 98–512, § 2(c), inserted “both” before “for pregnant adolescents”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1983–2018 · leading case: Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589 (1988).
Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589 (1988). “578, 42 U. S. C. § 300z et seq. (1982 ed. and Supp.”
Hein v. Freedom From Religion Found., Inc., 551 U.S. 587 (2007). “It went on to mandate that federally provided services in that area should "emphasize the provision of support by other family members, religious and charitable organizations, voluntary associations, and other groups." § 300z(a)(10)(c).”
Kendrick v. Bowen, 657 F. Supp. 1547 (D.D.C. 1987). “INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Adolescent Family Life Act (“AFLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300z—300z-10 (1981), on the ground that on its face and as applied the statute violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.”
Freedom From Religion Found., Inc. v. Nicholson, 536 F.3d 730 (7th Cir. 2008). “42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(8)(B) (1982 ed.). It went on to mandate that federally provided services in that area should “emphasize the provision of support by other family members, religious and charitable organizations, voluntary associations, and other groups.”
DeStefano v. Emergency Hous. Grp., Inc., 247 F.3d 397 (2d Cir. 2001). “2562 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(10)(C), § 300z-5(a)(21)) (alteration in original).”
Bowen v. Kendrick, 483 U.S. 1304 (1987). “The applicant requests that I stay an order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia enjoining the enforcement of parts of the Adolescent Family Life Act, 42 U. S. C. § 300z et seq. (1982 ed. and Supp.”
Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am., Inc. v. Heckler, 712 F.2d 650 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “Title XX of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300z et seq. (Supp. V 1981), was enacted as part of the same legislative package as the Title X amendment.”
Kendrick v. Sullivan, 766 F. Supp. 1180 (D.D.C. 1991). “5 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a). The goal of the AFLA is to promote adoption and self-discipline, as well as to support comprehensive care services for pregnant adolescents and to encourage research into the societal causes and consequences of teenage pregnancy and sexual activity.”
Kendrick v. Sullivan, 125 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 1989). “” To summarize, the bulk of HHS’ interrogatories posit factual scenarios which may or may not exist among participants in the grant program of the Adolescent Family Life Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300z et seq. (hereinafter “AFLA”).”
Lamont v. Schultz, 748 F. Supp. 1043 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “This is arguably correct in Kendrick where the statute at issue explicitly indicated that religious organizations may be involved in program implementation of The Adolescent Family Life Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300z et seq. (1982 ed. and Supp.”
New York v. Heckler, 719 F.2d 1191 (2d Cir. 1983). “Under all of these circumstances, we do not see why plaintiffs’ case or controversy with the Secretary suddenly disappeared because, as our colleague assumes, they could seek “to put [the Secretary] in contempt” in another forum, which they did not choose.”
Pulido v. Bennett, 860 F.2d 296 (8th Cir. 1988). “578 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300z — 300z-10 (1982 & Supp.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a) — 2 cases
Kendrick v. Bowen, 657 F. Supp. 1547 (D.D.C. 1987). “INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Adolescent Family Life Act (“AFLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300z—300z-10 (1981), on the ground that on its face and as applied the statute violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.”
Kendrick v. Sullivan, 766 F. Supp. 1180 (D.D.C. 1991). “5 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a). The goal of the AFLA is to promote adoption and self-discipline, as well as to support comprehensive care services for pregnant adolescents and to encourage research into the societal causes and consequences of teenage pregnancy and sexual activity.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(10)(A) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am., Inc. v. Heckler, 712 F.2d 650 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “Title XX of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300z et seq. (Supp. V 1981), was enacted as part of the same legislative package as the Title X amendment.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(10)(C) — 1 case
DeStefano v. Emergency Hous. Grp., Inc., 247 F.3d 397 (2d Cir. 2001). “2562 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(10)(C), § 300z-5(a)(21)) (alteration in original).”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(5) — 1 case
Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589 (1988). “578, 42 U. S. C. § 300z et seq. (1982 ed. and Supp.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(8)(A) — 1 case
DeStefano v. Emergency Hous. Grp., Inc., 247 F.3d 397 (2d Cir. 2001). “2562 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(10)(C), § 300z-5(a)(21)) (alteration in original).”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(8)(B) — 4 cases
Hein v. Freedom From Religion Found., Inc., 551 U.S. 587 (2007). “It went on to mandate that federally provided services in that area should "emphasize the provision of support by other family members, religious and charitable organizations, voluntary associations, and other groups." § 300z(a)(10)(c).”
Freedom From Religion Found., Inc. v. Nicholson, 536 F.3d 730 (7th Cir. 2008). “42 U.S.C. § 300z(a)(8)(B) (1982 ed.). It went on to mandate that federally provided services in that area should “emphasize the provision of support by other family members, religious and charitable organizations, voluntary associations, and other groups.”
Kendrick v. Bowen, 657 F. Supp. 1547 (D.D.C. 1987). “INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Adolescent Family Life Act (“AFLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300z—300z-10 (1981), on the ground that on its face and as applied the statute violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union of Mass. v. Sebelius, 697 F. Supp. 2d 200 (D. Mass. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(b) — 1 case
Kendrick v. Bowen, 657 F. Supp. 1547 (D.D.C. 1987). “INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Adolescent Family Life Act (“AFLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300z—300z-10 (1981), on the ground that on its face and as applied the statute violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(b)(3) — 1 case
Kendrick v. Bowen, 657 F. Supp. 1547 (D.D.C. 1987). “INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Adolescent Family Life Act (“AFLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300z—300z-10 (1981), on the ground that on its face and as applied the statute violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300z(b)(4Mb)(6) — 1 case
Kendrick v. Bowen, 657 F. Supp. 1547 (D.D.C. 1987). “INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Adolescent Family Life Act (“AFLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300z—300z-10 (1981), on the ground that on its face and as applied the statute violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.