42 U.S.C. § 3603
Effective dates of certain prohibitions
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 133
cases (34 in the last 5 years), 1969–2026 · leading case: Wilkison v. City of Arapahoe, 302 Neb. 968 (Neb. 2019).
Wilkison v. City of Arapahoe, 302 Neb. 968 (Neb. 2019). “11 The FHA defines a discriminatory housing practice as any act that is unlawful under 42 U.S.C. § 3603 (effective dates of certain prohibitions), 42 U.”
McKIVITZ v. Twp. of Stowe, 769 F. Supp. 2d 803 (W.D. Pa. 2010). “As made applicable by section 803 [ 42 U.S.C. § 3603 ] and except as exempted by sections 803(b) and 807 [ 42 U.”
Lincoln v. Case, 340 F.3d 283 (5th Cir. 2003). “Section 3604 states as follows: As made applicable by section 803 [ 42 U.S.C. § 3603 ] and except as exempted by sections 803(b) and 807 [ 42 U.”
Lindsay v. Yates, 498 F.3d 434 (6th Cir. 2007). “5 *438 First, the district court dismissed the Lindsays’ claim under 42 U.S.C. § 3603 . The district court reasoned that § 3603 does not constitute an independent cause of action under the FHA, but simply works in conjunction with the prohibitions set forth in § 3604 of the Act.”
Thurmond v. Bowman, 211 F. Supp. 3d 554 (W.D.N.Y. 2016). “Under 42 U.S.C. § 3603 (a), the provisions of § 3604 apply to all dwellings unless an exemption under 42 U.”
Hogar Agua Y Vida en El Desierto, Inc. v. Suarez-Medina, 36 F.3d 177 (1st Cir. 1994). “42 U.S.C. § 3603 (b)(1) (emphasis added; clause numbers added; indentation altered from original).”
Lindsay v. Yates, 578 F.3d 407 (6th Cir. 2009). “§ 1982 ; (2) racial discrimination in the sale of real property in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3603 ; (3) racial discrimination in the sale of real property in violation of .”
Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp., 884 A.2d 1109 (D.C. 2005). “On the other hand, the federal Fair Housing Act's "reasonable accommodation" requirement applies to private as well as public housing, see 42 U.S.C. § 3603 (a) (2000), and DCRA could well serve as a facilitator of reasonable accommodations by brokering a dialogue between tenant…”
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3603 (b)(1) & (2) (2012) (exempting from compliance “any single-family house sold or rented by an owner,” provided such “owner does not own more than three such .”
Chicago Lawyers' Comm. for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc. v. Craigslist, Inc., 519 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 2008). “The Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, on behalf of its members, contends in this suit that craigslist, which provides an electronic meeting place for those who want to buy, sell,, or rent housing (and many other goods and services), is violating this…”
Evans v. Romer, 882 P.2d 1335 (Colo. 1994). “Schwartz ed. 1970) (detailing legislative history and policies underlying "Mrs.”
Gregory Selden v. Airbnb, Inc., 4 F.4th 148 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3603 (b)(1). Because Airbnb was not a party to the contract between Selden and the host, and had no agency relationship with the host, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 did not apply.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3603(b) — 3 cases
Evans v. First Fed. Sav. Bank of Indiana, 669 F. Supp. 915 (N.D. Ind. 1987).
Monus v. Riecke (E.D. La. 2021).
United States v. Knippers & Day Real Est., Inc., 298 F. Supp. 551 (E.D. La. 1969).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3603(b)(1) — 1 case
Wilson v. Liu (N.D. Cal. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.