42 U.S.C. § 416

AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

“There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this title, $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003, to remain available until expended.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4,457 cases (1,367 in the last 5 years), 1952–2026 · leading case: Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749 (1975).
Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749 (1975). · cites it 19× “510 , and as amended, 42 U. S. C. §§ 416 (c) (5) and (e) (2) (1970 ed.”
Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137 (1987). · cites it 8× “771 , 42 U. S. C. § 416 (i) (1952 ed.). In 1954, Congress replaced those definitions with slightly different ones contained in a new § 216(i).”
Thomas v. Astrue, 674 F. Supp. 2d 507 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). · cites it 15× “42 U.S.C. § 416 (h)(2)(A)-(3)(C)(2006). A child is deemed to be “dependent” on a wage earner if (1) at the time of death, the wage earner was living with or “contributing to the support of’ such child, 42 U.”
Mathews v. Lucas, 427 U.S. 495 (1976). · cites it 10× “" Section 216 (e), 42 U. S. C. § 416 (e), includes, under the definition of child, inter alia, "the child .”
Schafer v. Astrue, 641 F.3d 49 (4th Cir. 2011). · cites it 22× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 416 (h)(2), (h)(3)(C). The district court agreed.”
Treichler v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 775 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “As a result, the ALJ held that Treichler was not disabled under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 416 (i), 423(d). The Appeals Council denied Treichler’s request for review of the ALJ’s decision.”
Jimenez v. Weinberger, 417 U.S. 628 (1974). · cites it 10× “The claims of appellants, Eugenio and Alicia, were denied, however, on the ground that they did not meet the requirements of 42 U. S. C. § 416 (h) (3), since neither child's paternity had been acknowledged or affirmed through evidence of domicile and support before the onset of…”
Mary Davis, Cross-Appellant v. Joseph A. Califano, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, Cross-Appellee, 603 F.2d 618 (7th Cir. 1979). · cites it 12× “The term “widow” means the surviving wife of the insured, 42 U.S.C. § 416 (c). There are two methods for qualifying for widow’s insurance benefits.”
Garner Childress, on Behalf of Patrick Childress v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 679 F.2d 623 (6th Cir. 1982). · cites it 15× “Patrick Childress, the claimant, maintains that he is a “child” of the wage earner within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 416 (h)(2)(A) 1 or § 416(h)(3)(C)(ii), 2 and, therefore, is entitled to benefits under 42 U.”
Carrie J. Cox, for Michael K. Cox, S.S. Nvk-Tp-Ducg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 684 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1982). · cites it 9× “42 U.S.C.A. § 416 (h)(2)(A) (1974); Ga.Code Ann.”
Turner v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 613 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “In 2002, he filed an application for Title II disability insurance benefits, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416 (i), 423(d), claiming that he was unable to work on July 3, 1990, due to gunshot wounds, chronic back pain, and post-traumatic stress disorder.”
Jeanette Luke for Scott E. Luke v. Otis R. Bowen, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. of the United States, 868 F.2d 974 (8th Cir. 1989). · cites it 21× “Scott Luke was not entitled to benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 416 (h)(2)(A), because under South Dakota Law, S.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(I) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(e) — 1 case
Boyd v. Folsom, 149 F. Supp. 925 (W.D. Pa. 1957).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(h) — 8 cases
Morris v. Richardson, 346 F. Supp. 494 (N.D. Ga. 1972).
Marek v. Flemming, 192 F. Supp. 528 (S.D. Tex. 1961).
Lucas v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 390 F. Supp. 1310 (D.R.I. 1975).
Turley v. Cohen, 325 F. Supp. 1067 (S.D.W. Va 1971).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(1)(A) — 2 cases
Mrs. Almena Willet Matthews v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 472 F.2d 1176 (5th Cir. 1973).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(1)(A)(i) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(2)(A) — 5 cases
Schafer v. Astrue, 641 F.3d 49 (4th Cir. 2011). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 416 (h)(2), (h)(3)(C). The district court agreed.”
Kathleen Steele v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 51 F.4th 1059 (11th Cir. 2022).
McBride v. Heckler, 619 F. Supp. 1554 (D.N.J. 1985).
Kathleen Steele v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 94 F.4th 1263 (11th Cir. 2024).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(3)(A) — 1 case
Rhodes ex rel. Rhodes v. Weinberger, 66 F.R.D. 601 (E.D. Pa. 1975).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(3)(C) — 2 cases
Rhodes v. Weinberger, 388 F. Supp. 437 (E.D. Pa. 1975).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(3)(C)(ii) — 2 cases
Carrie J. Cox, for Michael K. Cox, S.S. Nvk-Tp-Ducg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 684 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1982). “42 U.S.C.A. § 416 (h)(2)(A) (1974); Ga.Code Ann.”
Smith ex rel. Sisk v. Bowen, 862 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1989).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(i) — 72 cases
Ealy v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 594 F.3d 504 (6th Cir. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(i)(1)(A) — 1 case
Jackson v. Colvin, 240 F. Supp. 3d 593 (E.D. Tex. 2017).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(i)(2)(C) — 2 cases
Yu v. Astrue, 963 F. Supp. 2d 201 (E.D.N.Y 2013).
— 42 U.S.C. § 416(i)(l) — 3 cases
Holguin v. Harris, 480 F. Supp. 1171 (N.D. Cal. 1979).
Cashman v. Shalala, 817 F. Supp. 217 (D. Mass. 1993).
Harris v. Heckler, 580 F. Supp. 1546 (E.D. Wis. 1984).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.