42 U.S.C. § 4201
Repealed. Pub. L. 97–258, § 5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2024 · leading case: AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC v. Smith, 470 F. Supp. 2d 586 (D. Maryland 2007).
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC v. Smith, 470 F. Supp. 2d 586 (D. Maryland 2007). “, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4201 , et seq., and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 38 U.”
Colorado Gen. Assembly v. Lamm, 738 P.2d 1156 (Colo. 1987). “V, 1975); Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 4201 , et seq. (1970); Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.”
Philadelphia Council of Neighborhood Organizations v. Coleman, 437 F. Supp. 1341 (E.D. Pa. 1977). “See Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 4201 et seq. 25 . Among the agencies and parties to whom the Draft EIS was circulated for comment were the United States Environmental Protection Agency; the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; the…”
Stewart v. United States Postal Serv., 508 F. Supp. 112 (N.D. Cal. 1980). “In moving for an injunction, plaintiffs relied on three contentions: the Postal Service was being constructed in violation of city zoning ordinances and codes and without regard to the city’s design and architectural review process; the Postal Service failed to comply with the…”
Cnty. of Suffolk v. Sec'y of Interior, 562 F.2d 1368 (2d Cir. 1977). “; the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4201 et seq.; fair value market requirements for sales and leases, 31 U.”
Educ./instruccion, Inc. v. Thomas Moore, Individually & as Chairman of Capitol Reg'l Planningagency, 503 F.2d 1187 (2d Cir. 1975). “In Had-ley, supra, the power to tax and spend was an important governmental power had by the district; in the year 1974 having a principal hand on the faucet of federal grants must be treated as at least as important as the local power to tax, especially where federal grants may…”
City of Rochester v. United States Postal Serv., 541 F.2d 967 (2d Cir. 1976). “The Postal Service argues that the ICA is inapplicable to it, despite the fact that § 101 of the ICA, 42 U.S.C. § 4201 (1), specifically includes all federal instrumentalities and wholly owned corporations within the definitions of “Federal agencies” subject to the Act.”
Citizens for Balanced Env't & Transp., Inc. v. Sec'y of Transp., 515 F. Supp. 151 (D. Conn. 1980). “1098 , 42 U.S.C. § 4201 et seq.; the Federal-Aid Highway Act, as amended, 80 Stat.”
Twp. of Clinton v. United States Postal Serv., 638 F. Supp. 763 (D.N.J. 1986). “To conform with the mandate of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act 2 of *765 1968 (ICA), 42 U.S.C. § 4201 (1977), repealed, P.L. 97-258, 96 Stat.”
Wilder v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 154 A.D.2d 261 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989). “It is significant that the Postal Service had direct control over the planned new facility and the old main post office which the City of Rochester feared would simply be abandoned, with the potential loss of 1,400 jobs.”
City of Thousand Oaks v. United States, 396 F. Supp. 1306 (C.D. Cal. 1974). “, and the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 4201 et seq., to prevent the defendants from constructing a post office in the City of Thousand Oaks at a site selected by the defendants.”
Texas v. United States ex rel. Cmty. Servs. Admin., 426 F. Supp. 74 (W.D. Tex. 1976). “The grant application contained no evidence that it had been submitted to appropriate state and local clearinghouses for review and comment as required by Title IV of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 4201 , et seq. and by rules and regulations…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.