42 U.S.C. § 4334
Other statutory obligations of agencies
Nothing in section 4332 or 4333 of this title shall in any way affect the specific statutory obligations of any Federal agency (1) to comply with criteria or standards of environmental quality, (2) to coordinate or consult with any other Federal or State agency, or (3) to act, or refrain from acting contingent upon the recommendations or certification of any other Federal or State agency.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case: United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973).
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973). “§ 4335 specifies that "[t]he policies and goals set forth in [NEPA] are supplementary to those set forth in existing authorizations of Federal agencies," and 42 U. S. C. § 4334 instructs that the Act "shall [not] in any way affect the specific statutory obligations of any…”
Constitution Pipeline Co. v. New York State Dep't of Env't Conservation, 868 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2017). “” 42 U.S.C. § 4334 . We note also that while the Natural Gas Act generally preempts state laws, it states that “[e]xcépt as specifically provided[,] .”
Pac. Legal Found. v. Cecil B. Andrus, 657 F.2d 829 (6th Cir. 1981). “See 42 U.S.C. § 4334 . The Supreme Court has held that NEPA was not intended to repeal by implication any other statute and thereby create powers not created in the agency’s enabling legislation.”
Abraham Scherr v. John Volpe, 466 F.2d 1027 (7th Cir. 1972). “42 U.S.C. § 4334 . 2 . P.P.M. 90-1 was not transmitted to the federal agencies until October 24, 1971, which followed the final federal approval of the Highway 16 project but preceded the commencement of actual construction.”
Eastlake Cmty. Council v. Roanoke Assocs., Inc., 513 P.2d 36 (Wash. 1973). “050 and 42 U.S.C. § 4334 RCW 43.21C.060 and 42 U.”
Kisner v. Butz, 350 F. Supp. 310 (N.D.W. Va. 1972). “Section 102 of NEPA provides that its procedures be implemented and carried out ‘to the fullest extent possible.’ Thus the somewhat flexible and general guidelines articulated in Section 101 are not to be found in its companion Section 102.”
Crosby v. Young, 512 F. Supp. 1363 (E.D. Mich. 1981). “42 U.S.C. § 4334 . The content and context of NEPA was reviewed soon after it was enacted in Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee v.”
McGinnis v. Kansas City Power & Light Co., 647 P.2d 1313 (Kan. 1982). “Very relevant to the issue before us is 42 U.S.C.A. § 4334 , which recognizes the obligations of a federal agency to coordinate or consult with other federal or state agencies and to act or refrain from acting contingent upon the recommendations or certification of any other…”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 389 F. Supp. 689 (D.D.C. 1974). “§ 4333 Section 104 is 42 U.S.C. § 4334 Section 105 is 42 U.S.C.”
Oklahoma Wildlife Fed'n v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 681 F. Supp. 1470 (N.D. Okla. 1988). “§ 4334 specifically provides that nothing in §§ 4332 or 4333 shall in any way affect the specific statutory obligations of any federal agency to comply with other environmental criteria, to consult with other federal or state agencies, or to act or refuse to act upon the…”
Am. Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 175 F.3d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “” 42 U.S.C. § 4334 (1). Therefore, § 4332(2)(B) cannot require the EPA to disregard the prohibition in § 109(d)(1) upon the consideration of costs in setting NAAQS.”
Town of Sutton v. Water Supply, 355 A.2d 867 (N.H. 1976). “42 U.S.C. § 4334 . The EPA is itself denied the authority to look behind the state certification.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.