42 U.S.C. § 4636
Payments not to be considered as income for revenue purposes or for eligibility for assistance under Social Security Act or other Federal law
No payment received under this subchapter shall be considered as income for the purposes of title 26; or for the purposes of determining the eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person for assistance under the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] or any other Federal law (except for any Federal law providing low-income housing assistance).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1973–1986 · leading case: Knebel v. Hein, 429 U.S. 288 (1977).
Knebel v. Hein, 429 U.S. 288 (1977). “42 U. S. C. § 4636 ; Hamilton v. Butz, 520 F.”
Young v. Harder, 361 F. Supp. 64 (D. Kan. 1973). “First, they claim Section 216 of the Uniform Relocation Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 4636 , requires defendants to disregard the equity which plaintiffs have in their home to the extent the value of the equity equals the amount of their replacement housing payment.”
Strogoff v. United States, 10 Cl. Ct. 584 (Ct. Cl. 1986). “” 42 U.S.C. § 4636 (“section 216”). Before the sale, the plaintiffs attempted to determine from CRA officials whether the proceeds from sales to private parties would fall under that provision.”
David R. Murray v. Otis R. Bowen, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 786 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1986). “” 42 U.S.C. § 4636 (1982). Appellant argues that there is no rational basis for treating identical state and federal payments differently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.