42 U.S.C. § 7402

CESSATION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

“Effective on the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 7, 1986], the United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation (hereafter in this subtitle referred to as the ‘Corporation’) may not make any legally binding awards or commitments for financial assistance (including any changes in an existing award or commitment) pursuant to the Energy Security Act [Pub. L. 96–294; see Short Title note set out under section 8801 of this title] for synthetic fuel project proposals, except that nothing in this Act [see Tables for classification] shall impair or alter the powers, duties, rights, obligations, privileges, or liabilities of the Corporation, its Board or Chairman, or project sponsors in the performance and completion of the terms and undertakings of a legally binding award or commitment entered into prior to the date of enactment of this Act.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Pers. Watercraft Coalition v. Marin Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 425 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Pers. Watercraft Coalition v. Marin Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 425 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). “(See 42 U.S.C. §§ 7402 (a), 7408(f).) The Clean Air Act has been interpreted to permit local adoption of “in-use regulations” even when such measures “are expressly intended to control emissions.”

New York v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 263 F. Supp. 2d 650 (W.D.N.Y. 2003). “, 42 U.S.C. § 7402 . Under the Act, the United States Environmental Protection Agency is charged with establishing primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards for particular air pollutants.”

Mountain States Legal Found. v. Douglas M. Costle, State of Colorado Ex Rel. J. D. MacFarlane Petitioner-Intervenor, 630 F.2d 754 (10th Cir. 1980). “” 42 U.S.C. § 7402 (b) and (a). “Each State shall have the primary responsibility for assuring air quality within the entire geographic area comprising such State by submitting an implementation plan for such State which will specify the manner in which national primary and…”

Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 274 F.R.D. 305 (D.D.C. 2011). “” Upon consideration of the motions, the oppositions thereto, and the record of this ease, the Court concludes that both motions should be denied.”

People Ex Rel. Madigan v. PSI Energy, Inc., 847 N.E.2d 514 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “§ 7402 (a) (2000) (mandating that USEPA “shall *** encourage the enactment of improved and *** uniform State and local laws relating to the prevention and control of air pollution[ ] and encourage the making of agreements and compacts between States for the prevention and…”

United States v. State of California (E.D. Cal. 2020). “18 42 U.S.C. § 7402 (c). The United States argues that under the 19 canon of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, the court must 20 infer that the express reference to agreements between states 21 serves to preclude agreements between states and foreign powers.”

Muhammad v. Tennessee Valley Auth. (E.D. Tenn. 2024). “§ 1983 ; the Clean Air Act, (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7402 et seq.; the Clean Water Act, (“CWA”), 33 U.”

Ctr. Biological v. Dept Pub. Health (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). “2020); 42 U.S.C. § 7402 . One of the CAA’s primary goals is “to protect and enhance the quality of the [n]ation’s air resources so as to promote the public health and welfare.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.