42 U.S.C. § 9602
Designation of additional hazardous substances and establishment of reportable released quantities; regulations
1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–499 inserted provisions setting deadlines for promulgation of proposed and final regulations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 76
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: Waterkeeper All. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 853 F.3d 527 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Waterkeeper All. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 853 F.3d 527 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “See 42 U.S.C. § 9602 (a) (CERCLA); see also id.”
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Blackstone Valley Elec. Co., 67 F.3d 981 (1st Cir. 1995). “” 42 U.S.C. § 9602 (a). The EPA has codified a consolidated list of hazardous substances subsuming all of the statutory lists incorporated by CERCLA, at 40 C.”
Dedham Water Co. & Dedham-Westwood Water Dist. v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc., 889 F.2d 1146 (1st Cir. 1989). “See 42 U.S.C. § 9602 ; 40 C.F.R. § 302.1 , et seq.”
United States v. Wade, 577 F. Supp. 1326 (E.D. Pa. 1983). “42 U.S.C. § 9602 (b). This provision may have been aimed at the fact that EPA has promulgated effluent standards for only a few toxic pollutants designated pursuant to § 307(a) of FWPCA and apparently has no plans to promulgate additional standards in the immediate future.”
United States v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., United States of Am. v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., 934 F.2d 599 (5th Cir. 1991). “The reportable quantity of acrylonitrile, established by regulation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 9602 (a), 12 is one hundred pounds.”
City of New York v. Exxon Corp., 744 F. Supp. 474 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) pursuant to Section 102 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9602 , see 40 C.F.R. Table 302.”
The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. & Donald Leogrande, 759 F.2d 1032 (2d Cir. 1985). “§ 2606 (1982), while authorizing EPA to designate additional substances that "may present substantial danger to the public health or welfare or the environment,” 42 U.S.C. § 9602 (a). 7 . 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (24) provides: "remedy” or "remedial action” means those actions…”
United States v. Conservation Chem. Co., 619 F. Supp. 162 (W.D. Mo. 1985). “) 42 U.S.C. § 9602 (a). Similarly, the interim standards for reportable quantities under CERCLA — one pound for all substances except those designated pursuant to § 311(b)(2)(A) of *196 FWPCA — suggests that Congress intended a result almost as drastic as the one the generator…”
United States v. Serafini, 750 F. Supp. 168 (M.D. Penn. 1990). “This definition incorporates a number of lists of hazardous substances and allows the EPA to add additional substances to the list in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 9602 . The affidavit of Anthony Bouselli which the City of Scranton submitted in support of its cross-motion for…”
Tesoro Refining & Mktg. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 164 Wash. 2d 310 (Wash. 2008). “020(l)(a) (categorizing “hazardous substance” according to federal statute 42 U.S.C. § 9602 , which defines “hazardous substance” as air pollutants and substances that when discharged present an imminent and substantial danger to the public health or welfare or the environment).”
A.Y. McDonald Indus., Inc. v. Ins. Co. of North Am., 475 N.W.2d 607 (Iowa 1991). “A “hazardous substance” includes “any element, compound, mixture, solution, or substance” covered under certain federal environment statutes, including “hazardous waste” under RCRA and substances designated by the EPA under 42 U.S.C. § 9602 . 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (14).”
United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp., 755 F. Supp. 531 (N.D.N.Y. 1991). “Hazardous substances under CERCLA, then, include all substances so designated under other statutes pursuant to the grant of authority contained therein in addition to substances so designated by the EPA pursuant to the grant of authority under 42 U.S.C. § 9602 (a). See United…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 9602(a) — 2 cases
United States v. Monsanto Co., 858 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1988).
Pennsylvania v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 684 F. Supp. 2d 564 (M.D. Penn. 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.