U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 106— COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM

42 U.S.C. § 9902

Definitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
In this chapter:(1) Eligible entity; family literacy services(A) Eligible entityThe term “eligible entity” means an entity—(i) that is an eligible entity described in paragraph (1) (as in effect on the day before October 27, 1998) as of the day before October 27, 1998, or is designated by the process described in section 9909 of this title (including an organization serving migrant or seasonal farmworkers that is so described or designated); and(ii) that has a tripartite board or other mechanism described in subsection (a) or (b), as appropriate, of section 9910 of this title.(B) Family literacy services

The term “family literacy services” has the meaning given the term in section 9832 of this title.

(2) Poverty line

The term “poverty line” means the official poverty line defined by the Office of Management and Budget based on the most recent data available from the Bureau of the Census. The Secretary shall revise annually (or at any shorter interval the Secretary determines to be feasible and desirable) the poverty line, which shall be used as a criterion of eligibility in the community services block grant program established under this chapter. The required revision shall be accomplished by multiplying the official poverty line by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers during the annual or other interval immediately preceding the time at which the revision is made. Whenever a State determines that it serves the objectives of the block grant program established under this chapter, the State may revise the poverty line to not to exceed 125 percent of the official poverty line otherwise applicable under this paragraph.

(3) Private, nonprofit organization

The term “private, nonprofit organization” includes a religious organization, to which the provisions of section 9920 of this title shall apply.

(4) Secretary

The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

(5) State

The term “State” means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, § 673, as added Pub. L. 105–285, title II, § 201, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2729.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 9902, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, § 673, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 511; Pub. L. 97–115, § 17(a)(1), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1609; Pub. L. 98–288, § 31(a), May 21, 1984, 98 Stat. 197; Pub. L. 98–558, title II, § 202, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2884; Pub. L. 99–425, title IV, § 402, Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 968; Pub. L. 101–501, title IV, §§ 402, 408, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1251, 1255; Pub. L. 103–171, § 7(c)(1), Dec. 2, 1993, 107 Stat. 1994, defined terms used in this chapter, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–285.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 70 cases (38 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Off. of the Pub. Def. v. State, 993 A.2d 55 (Md. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Off. of the Pub. Def. v. State, 993 A.2d 55 (Md. 2010). · cites it 8× “(1) Except as provided in § D(3) of this regulation, the maximum net annual income level for persons accepted for representation in District Court cases, violation of probation, and contempt proceedings may not exceed 100 percent of the current official federal *64 poverty…”
Accion Soc. De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Norberto Viera Perez, Etc., 831 F.2d 365 (1st Cir. 1987). · cites it 5× “42 U.S.C. § 9902 (Supp.1987). In October 1984, the CSBG Act was amended.”
Workman v. State, 993 A.2d 94 (Md. 2010). · cites it 4× “05D, entitled "Maximum Income Level," provides: (1) Except as provided in § D(3) of this regulation, the maximum net annual income level for persons accepted for representation in District Court cases, violation of probation, and contempt proceedings may not exceed 100 percent…”
Gress v. Gress, 743 N.W.2d 67 (Neb. 2007). “Department of Health and Human Services under authority of 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered as defined in paragraph I above.”
In Re Marriage of Randall v. Randall, 2000 WI App 98 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “(bp) The needs of each party in order to support himself or herself at a level equal to or greater than that established under 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2). (bz) The needs of any person, other than the child, whom either party is legally obligated to support.”
Martin v. North Carolina Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 670 S.E.2d 629 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009). “(2) (A) The income level established under paragraph (1)(B) shall be at least the percent provided under subparagraph (B) (but not more than 100 percent) of the official poverty line (as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, and revised annually in accordance with…”
Henke v. Guerrero, 692 N.W.2d 762 (Neb. Ct. App. 2005). “Department of Health and Human Services under authority of 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered as defined in paragraph I above.”
Stewart v. Stewart, 613 N.W.2d 486 (Neb. Ct. App. 2000). “Department of Health and Human Services under authority of 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered as defined in paragraph I.”
Oberlander v. Cnty. of Contra Costa, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9777 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “” ( 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2).) 3 The county had previously defined budget unit as “the GA applicant or recipient and those household members who are legally or financially responsible for him or her.”
Binder v. Binder, 291 Neb. 255 (Neb. 2015). “Department of Health and Human Services under authority of 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered .”
Rogers v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 39 (Ct. Cl. 1987). “42 U.S.C. §§ 9902 (1), 9904(c). The Act permitted States to opt out of the block grant program for FFY 1982 and instead have the Secretary of Health and Human Services directly fund State and local CAAs under the former law.”
State Ex Rel. Z. P. v. Porter, 610 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 2000). “Department of Health and Human Services under authority of 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2), except minimum support may be ordered as defined in paragraph I.”
Show all 70 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.