43 U.S.C. § 1302
REFERENCES.
“Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or other paper of the United States to the aqueduct referred to in section 1301 hereby is deemed to be a reference to the ‘Fannin-McFarland Aqueduct’.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1960–2021 · leading case: Sec'y of the Interior v. California, 464 U.S. 312 (1984).
Sec'y of the Interior v. California, 464 U.S. 312 (1984). “43 U. S. C. §§ 1302 , 1311. CZMA was enacted in 1972 to encourage the prudent management and conservation of natural resources in the coastal zone.”
State v. Bundrant, 546 P.2d 530 (Alaska 1976). “The SLA, 43 U.S.C. § 1302 (1953) provides: "Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to affect in any wise the rights of the United States to the natural resources of that portion of the subsoil and seabed of the Continental Shelf lying seaward and outside of the area of lands…”
United States v. Louisiana, 363 U.S. 1 (1960). “§ 1314 ); 9 and retains in the United States all rights in submerged lands lying beyond those areas to the seaward limits of the Continental Shelf (§ 9, 43 U. S. C. § 1302 ). 10 *11 The United States concedes that the statute grants to each of the defendant States submerged land…”
Amoco Prod. Co. v. Sea Robin Pipeline Co., Pennzoil Producing Co. v. Sea Robin Pipeline Co., 844 F.2d 1202 (5th Cir. 1988). “On December 9, 1986, this court granted separate petitions by Amoco and Pennzoil for leave to appeal, and subsequently granted Sea Robin’s motion for an order consolidating the two interlocutory appeals.”
United States v. Maine, 420 U.S. 515 (1975). “” 43 U. S. C. § 1302 . This declaration by Congress is squarely at odds with the assertions of the States in the present case.”
Mississippi v. United States, 498 U.S. 16 (1990). “As against the plaintiff State of Mississippi and all persons claiming under it, the United States has exclusive rights to explore the area of the Continental Shelf reserved to the United States by the Submerged Lands Act, 43 U. S. C. § 1302 , and to exploit the natural…”
California v. Watt, 683 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1982). “43 U.S.C. §§ 1302 ,1332(a). The CZMA was not intended to change this division of control.”
Ne. Rsch., LLC v. One Shipwrecked Vessel, 790 F. Supp. 2d 56 (W.D.N.Y. 2011). “(“ASA”), the Submerged Lands Act (“SLA”), 43 U.S.C. § 1302 and various provisions of New York State Law.”
United States v. Ray, 423 F.2d 16 (5th Cir. 1970). “This Act further provides ( 43 U.S.C. § 1302 ) the definition of “natural resources” of the Continental Shelf: “Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to affect in any wise the rights of the United States to the natural resources of that portion of the subsoil and seabed of the…”
Earth Island Inst. v. Crystal Geyser Water Co. (N.D. Cal. 2021). “”); see 43 U.S.C. §§ 1302 , 1311. 13 Defendants argue that California contains many federal enclaves that encompass or overlap 14 with waterways and coastal areas, such as the Presidio in San Francisco, the Golden Gate National 15 Recreation Area, Point Reyes National Seashore,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.