U.S. Code » Title 43 » Chapter CHAPTER 12— RECLAMATION AND IRRIGATION OF LANDS BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— GENERAL PROVISIONS

43 U.S.C. § 377a

Limitation on use of funds where organizations or individuals are in arrears on contract charges

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar

No funds appropriated to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation and maintenance in this Act or in subsequent Energy and Water Development Appropriations Acts, except those derived from advances by water users, shall on and after October 2, 1992, be used for the particular benefits of lands (a) within the boundaries of an irrigation district, (b) of any member of a water users’ organization, or (c) of any individual when such district, organization, or individual is in arrears for more than twelve months in the payment of charges due under a contract entered into with the United States pursuant to laws administered by the Bureau of Reclamation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1961–2021 · leading case: S. Ry. Co. v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 294 F.2d 491 (5th Cir. 1961).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
S. Ry. Co. v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 294 F.2d 491 (5th Cir. 1961). “…Funds based on this presentation were included in the Public Works Appropriation Act, 1960, 73 Stat. 491 (1959) [43 U.S.C.A. § 377a].””
United States v. Fort Belknap Irrigation Dist., 197 F. Supp. 812 (D. Mont. 1961). “491 ), 43 U.S.C.A. § 377a. Each defendant was then charged by the Bureau for its share of the cost under the provision of its contract obligating it to pay for the maintenance of Sherburne Dam.”
United States v. 929.70 Acres of Land, 205 F. Supp. 456 (D.S.D. 1962). “743 , 43 U.S.C.A. § 377a, which Act appropriated funds for these purposes.”
Olson v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2021). · cites it 3× “Plaintiffs offer a slightly different list in their response to defendant’s motion to dismiss, identifying the following statutes and regulations as “incorporated within the leases and permits”: • 43 U.S.C. §377a, referring to “water users”, “benefits of lands” and “any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.