U.S. Code » Title 43 » Chapter CHAPTER 12— RECLAMATION AND IRRIGATION OF LANDS BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I–A— RECLAMATION REFORM

43 U.S.C. § 390zz

Reporting

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar

Any contracting entity subject to the ownership or pricing limitations of Federal reclamation law shall compile and maintain such records and information as the Secretary deems reasonably necessary to implement this subchapter and Federal reclamation law. On a date set by the Secretary following October 12, 1982, and annually thereafter, every such contracting entity shall provide in a form suitable to the Secretary such reports on the above matters as the Secretary may require.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–1993 · leading case: Orange Cove Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 28 Fed. Cl. 790 (Fed. Cl. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Orange Cove Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 28 Fed. Cl. 790 (Fed. Cl. 1993). “43 U.S.C. § 390zz (1982). II. Facts Specific to This Controversy The genesis of this case arose in 1986, when the Bureau of Reclamation began amending its regulations to implement provisions of the RRA, particularly section 203(b), commonly known as the “hammer clause.”
United States v. Quincy-Columbia Basin Irrigation Dist., 649 F. Supp. 487 (E.D. Wash. 1986). · cites it 2× “” 43 U.S.C. § 390zz (emphasis added) (Federal reclamation law is defined as those statutes in effect prior to the enactment of the Reform Act).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.