43 U.S.C. § 432

SAVINGS CLAUSE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar
“Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed as limiting or restricting the power and authority of the United States or—“(1) as affecting in any way any law governing appropriation or use of, or Federal right to, water on public lands;“(2) as expanding or diminishing Federal or State jurisdiction, responsibility, interests, or rights in water resources development or control;“(3) as displacing, superseding, limiting, or modifying any interstate compact or the jurisdiction or responsibility of any legally established joint or common agency of two or more States or of two States and the Federal Government;“(4) as superseding, modifying, or repealing, except as specifically set forth in this subtitle, existing law applicable to the various Federal agencies; or“(5) as modifying the terms of any interstate compact.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1976–1977 · leading case: United States v. Tulare Lake Canal Co., 535 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Tulare Lake Canal Co., 535 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1976). “388 , 43 U.S.C. § 432 , expressly provided that a public land entryman under the reclamation laws could not commute these residency and cultivation requirements by paying construction costs allocable to his land after 14 months’ residence and cultivation, as an entryman under…”
United States v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 559 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1977). “Similarly, the exclusive preference given to veterans by Section 9 has no counterpart in the general homestead laws, as incorporated into the reclamation law by 43 U.S.C. § 432 , 44 so this preference had to be qualified by a specific reference to 43 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.