43 U.S.C. § 951

Right of way for water transportation, domestic purposes, or development of power

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar

Rights of way for ditches, canals, or reservoirs heretofore or hereafter approved under the provisions of sections 946 to 949 of this title may be used for purposes of a public nature; and said rights of way may be used for purposes of water transportation, for domestic purposes, or for the development of power, as subsidiary to the main purpose of irrigation or drainage.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1928–2009 · leading case: Pine River Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 656 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (D. Colo. 2009).
Pine River Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 656 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (D. Colo. 2009). · cites it 4× “404 (codified at 43 U.S.C. § 951 ) (repealed Oct. 21, 1976).”
Bijou Irrigation Dist. v. Empire Club, 804 P.2d 175 (Colo. 1991). “We also conclude that the issue was adequately presented to the water court by introduction of the Morgan County District Court's judgment in the declaratory judgment action in which the court noted that to declare that the District has exclusive authority to use Empire…”
United States ex rel. Sierra Land & Water Co. v. Ickes, 84 F.2d 228 (D.C. Cir. 1936). · cites it 2× “404 , as amended ( 43 U.S.C.A. § 951 ), which provide for the granting of rights of way for canals and reservoirs to carry and store water for irrigation.”
United States v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co., 127 F.2d 349 (10th Cir. 1942). “404 , 43 U.S.C.A. § 951 , as amended March 4, 1917, c.”
Verde River Irrigation & Power Dist. v. Work, 24 F.2d 886 (D.C. Cir. 1928). “404 [43 USCA § 951]), for a right of way for the Horseshoe reservoir.”
Swalley Irrigation Dist. v. Alvis, 326 F. App'x 995 (9th Cir. 2009). “1 The court is satisfied that with respect to both the land subject to the Act of *997 March 3, 1891, 43 U.”
Swalley Irrigation Dist. v. Alvis, 326 F. App'x 995 (9th Cir. 2009). “1 The court is satisfied that with respect to both the land subject to the Act of *997 March 3, 1891, 43 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.