45 U.S.C. § 182
Duties, penalties, benefits, and privileges of subchapter I applicable
The duties, requirements, penalties, benefits, and privileges prescribed and established by the provisions of subchapter I of this chapter except section 153 of this title shall apply to said carriers by air and their employees in the same manner and to the same extent as though such carriers and their employees were specifically included within the definition of “carrier” and “employee”, respectively, in section 151 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1951–2018 · leading case: Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Int'l Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. & Charles J. Huttinger, 901 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1990).
Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Int'l Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. & Charles J. Huttinger, 901 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1990). “45 U.S.C. § 182 . . This is discussed infra; see text accompanying notes 92-93.”
United Indep. Flight Officers, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., 572 F. Supp. 1494 (N.D. Ill. 1983). “as applied to air carriers by 45 U.S.C. § 182 . 11 ALPA allegedly acted arbitrarily and capriciously by (1) the misrepresentation of and failure to disclose its collective bargaining position concerning (a) amending the plan to credit pilots for years before 1965 in which they…”
Cunningham v. Elec. Data Sys. Corp., 579 F. Supp. 2d 538 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). “§ 151 ; 45 U.S.C. § 182 (making 45 U.S.C. § 151 applicable to “carriers by air and *540 their employees”)- 1 A “carrier” under the RLA “includes any railroad [or air carrier] subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board .”
Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l, Cross v. United Air Lines, Inc., Cross-Appellee, 802 F.2d 886 (7th Cir. 1986). “§ 151 extends to “every air pilot or other person who performs any work as an employee or subordinate official of such carrier or carriers, subject to its or their continuing authority to supervise and direct the manner of rendition of his service ”) (emphasis added).”
Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists v. Cent. Airlines, Inc., 372 U.S. 682 (1963). “§ 202, 45 U. S. C. § 182 . In the place of § 3, Congress provided in § 205, 45 U.”
Am. Airlines, Inc. v. Robert Mawhinney, 904 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2018). “§ 152 , Fourth; 45 U.S.C. § 182 ; Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass’n, 897 F.”
Paul J. Pyles v. United Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware Corp., 79 F.3d 1046 (11th Cir. 1996). “See 45 U.S.C. § 182 . Instead, 45 U.S.C. § 184 imposes a compulsory duty on airlines and employees, "acting through their representatives,” to establish system boards of adjustment for the resolution of disputes.”
Barry L. Conrad v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. & Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l, 494 F.2d 914 (7th Cir. 1974). “The complaint asserted that sections 32 and 33 of the collective bargaining agreement and the limiting paragraph in the February 5, 1970 agreement “are contrary to 45 U.S.C. §§ 182 , 184, and 152.” In the course of discovery, plaintiff obtained copies of documents in Delta’s…”
Air Line Dispatchers Ass'n v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 189 F.2d 685 (D.C. Cir. 1951). “” ( 45 U.S.C.A. § 182 .) The Board therefore properly concluded that the territorial scope of the Act in its application to air transport was like that applicable to railroads.”
Santoni Roig v. Iberia Lineas Aereas De Espana, 688 F. Supp. 810 (D.P.R. 1988). “The statute seeks to avoid any interruption of commerce or of the operation of carriers engaged therein.”
Nat'l Mediation Bd. v. Cont'l Airlines Corp. (In Re Cont'l Airlines Corp.), 50 B.R. 342 (S.D. Tex. 1985). “45 U.S.C. § 182 (extending coverage to air carriers); see also TIA, 717 F.”
Donald Steward v. Airtran Airways, Inc., 351 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2003). “45 U.S.C. § 182 . See also Whitaker v. American Airlines, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.