45 U.S.C. § 564
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, § 7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379; Pub. L. 103–429, § 8(6), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4390
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1973–2015 · leading case: Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Nat'l Assn. of R.R. Passengers, 414 U.S. 453 (1974).
Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Nat'l Assn. of R.R. Passengers, 414 U.S. 453 (1974). “The train discontinuances that precipitated this action were announced by Amtrak pursuant to § 404 (b) (2) of the Amtrak Act, 45 U. S. C. § 564 (b) (2). [2] The gravamen of the respondent's complaint *455 was that these discontinuances are not authorized by, and in fact are…”
Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 470 U.S. 451 (1985). “Section 404 of the RPSA, 45 U. S. C. § 564 (1970 ed.), declared a 5-year moratorium on the discontinuance of any intercity passenger train by any railroad that had not transferred its responsibilities to Amtrak, but authorized those railroads to seek discontinuances, through the…”
Sec. Inv. Prot. Corp. v. Barbour, 421 U.S. 412 (1975). “The respondent passenger association brought an action to enjoin the discontinuance of a particular service as announced by the corporation pursuant to its authority under § 404 (b) (2) of the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970 (Amtrak Act), 45 U. S. C. § 564 (b)(2). That Act…”
Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., a Corp., 520 F.2d 91 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “The Court pointed out, Since § 401(a)(1) [of the Amtrak Act] authorizes only a contract for Amtrak to undertake a railroad’s entire responsibility for intercity rail passenger service, the respondent contends that Southern cannot relieve itself of only part of this…”
Nat'l R.R. Passenger v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 665 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Pa. 1987). “The Congress exerts systematic influence on Amtrak’s route structure, 45 U.S.C. § 564 ; Comptroller General’s Report at 7-8, and on other aspects of operations.”
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R.R. v. Chicago & North W. Transp. Co., 263 N.W.2d 189 (Wis. 1978). “10 However, under §45 U.S.C.A. §564(a), 11 defendant would not only have *526 been allowed to continue its Chicago-Milwaukee service, it would have been required to do so until January 1, 1975.”
Consol. Rail Corp. v. Metro-North Commuter R. Co., 638 F. Supp. 350 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1986). “45 U.S.C. § 564 . From the beginning Congress announced its intention to return Conrail to the private sector.”
Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. New Castle Cnty., 633 F. Supp. 354 (D. Del. 1986). “45 U.S.C. § 564 (c)(4)(A). This revenue shortfall is recuperated from federal subsidies.”
Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 475 F.2d 325 (D.C. Cir. 1973). “Appellant National Association of Railroad Passengers, a national organization of railroad patrons, sought to enjoin the discontinuances on the ground that they violated Sections 404(a) and 802 of the Amtrak Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 564 (a) and 642. Section 802 provides that “no…”
Kansas ex rel. Stephan v. Adams, 608 F.2d 861 (10th Cir. 1979). “Section 119 of the ’79 Act amends section 404 of the Rail Passenger Service Act, 45 U.S.C. § 564 , making specific references to the Secretary’s Final Report and making specific changes in the Report: Sec.”
Graphic Packaging Corp. v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Pub. Accounts of the State of Texas & Ken Paxton, Attorney Gen. of the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2015). “Section 1 Hosmer, Examiner, Report and Recommended 404 of the RPSA, 45 U. S. C. § 564 (1970 ed.), Order, Railroad Passenger Train Deficit, ICC declared a 5-year moratorium on the Docket No.”
The Legislative Veto & Cong. Review of Agency Rules (OLC 1981). “IV 1980), or when the National Railroad Passenger Corporation seeks to alter Amtrak’s basic route system, 45 U.S.C. § 564 (c) (1976 & Supp. IV 1980).”
— 45 U.S.C. § 564(a) — 1 case
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R.R. v. Chicago & North W. Transp. Co., 263 N.W.2d 189 (Wis. 1978). “10 However, under §45 U.S.C.A. §564(a), 11 defendant would not only have *526 been allowed to continue its Chicago-Milwaukee service, it would have been required to do so until January 1, 1975.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.