46 U.S.C. § 30901
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “Suits in Admiralty Act”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 61
cases (21 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: East Coast Repair v. United States, 16 F.4th 87 (4th Cir. 2021).
East Coast Repair v. United States, 16 F.4th 87 (4th Cir. 2021). “§ 7102 (d); Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30901 , et seq. 4 United States, 43 F.”
Roth v. Kiewit Offshore Servs., Ltd., 625 F. Supp. 2d 376 (S.D. Tex. 2008). “(the “PVA”) and the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 30901 , et seq. (the “SAA”).”
Garcia v. USA, 986 F.3d 513 (5th Cir. 2021). “13 46 U.S.C. §§ 30901 et seq. 14 46 U.S.C. §§ 31101 et seq.”
BMW of North Am. LLC v. M/V Courage, 254 F. Supp. 3d 591 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). “; (2) the United States, as Mary Smith’s employer, pursuant to the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30901 et seq., alleging breaches under COGSA and for negligence; (3) Ford, for product liability and negligence; and (4) GovLog, for violations of COGSA and for negligence.”
F.C. Wheat Mar. Corp. v. United States, 663 F.3d 714 (4th Cir. 2011). “, and the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30901 et seq., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.”
Wu Tien Li-Shou v. United States, 777 F.3d 175 (4th Cir. 2015). “, the Suits in Admiralty Act (SIAA), 46 U.S.C. § 30901 et seq., and the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA), 46 U.”
Abdulhalim Ali v. Robert Rogers, 780 F.3d 1229 (9th Cir. 2015). “§ 1291, and the Suits in Admi *1233 ralty Act (“SIAA”), 46 U.S.C. §§ 30901 et seq., to sue only the United States for admiralty claims.”
Vulcan Materials Co. v. Massiah, 645 F.3d 249 (4th Cir. 2011). “§ 31101 , and the Suits in Admiralty Act (“SAA”), 46 U.S.C. § 30901 , alleging that the Navy was liable for the accident and seeking contribution for any damages owed to Porter’s estate.”
Contango Operators, Inc. v. United States, 965 F. Supp. 2d 791 (S.D. Tex. 2013). “Contango asserts that pursuant to the Suits in Admiralty Act (“SAA”), 46 U.S.C. § 30901 et seq., the United States has waived its sovereign immunity with respect to Contango’s claims.”
East Coast Repair & Fabrication, LLC v. United States, 199 F. Supp. 3d 1006 (E.D. Va. 2016). “Jurisdiction over ECR’s Claims It is undisputed that this Court has jurisdiction over ECR’s claims alleging that ECR suffered damages as a result of the Government’s failure to provide compensation for alleged change order work pursuant to the parties’ written Contract, such…”
Compagnie Mar. Marfret v. San Juan Bay Pilots Corp., 532 F. Supp. 2d 369 (D.P.R. 2008). “The above-captioned claim is an admiralty action brought pursuant to the Suits in Admiralty Act (“SAA”), 46 U.S.C. § 30901 et seq., by plaintiffs Compagnie Maritime Marfret, Marseille Fret and the Underwriters Concerned (collectively “Plaintiffs”).”
In re Phil Steinle, 835 F. Supp. 2d 437 (N.D. Ohio 2011). “On April 15, 2010, decedent Benjamin Miller’s parents sued the Government for negligence pursuant to the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30901 et seq. (“SAA”). See No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.