47 U.S.C. § 506
Repealed. Pub. L. 96–507, § 1, Dec. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 2747
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1946–1982 · leading case: Am. Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 345 U.S. 100 (1953).
Am. Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 345 U.S. 100 (1953). “89 , 90, 47 U. S. C. § 506 (a) (c) (d). [7] For a report of the subsequent trial and acquittal on the merits, see United States v.”
United States v. Kemble, 198 F.2d 889 (3rd Cir. 1952). “When Congress wished to prevent that sort of coercion in the Lea Act (which has to do with “Coercive practices affecting broadcasting; * * * ”) it carefully so stated, 47 U.S. C.A. § 506(a) (1), (2), (3), (4), and made a violation punishable by imprisonment for not more than one…”
Westinghouse Broad. Co., Inc. v. Dukakis, 412 F. Supp. 580 (D. Mass. 1976). “I am of the opinion that the jostling of the plaintiff’s cameramen, the interference with them at very close range, and, in particular, the use of defendants’ motor vehicles to interfere with their travel, constitutes a level of harassment and intimidation which not only…”
F. & A. Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co., 98 F. Supp. 180 (S.D. Cal. 1951). “[41] Section 506(a) (1), 47 U.S.C.A. § 506 (a) (1). [42] United States v.”
New Orleans Opera Guild, Inc. v. Local 174, Musicians Mut. Prot. Union, 127 So. 2d 358 (La. Ct. App. 1961). “The Federal Government, it is true, in the so-called Lea Act ( 47 U.S.C.A. § 506 ) has undertaken to regulate such contracts with: respect to Radio Broadcasting, and there-may be other statutory regulations which: treat of the subject as applied to limited.”
Cotton's, Inc. v. Teamsters Local No. 5, 547 F. Supp. 1336 (M.D. La. 1982). “Whether defendant can allege by responsive pleadings hereafter filed, and subsequently establish at the trial, that it was coerced, compelled or constrained by some involuntary means to enter into the agreement in question and further convince the court that by virtue thereof it…”
United States v. Petrillo, 68 F. Supp. 845 (N.D. Ill. 1946). “The information filed herein charges a violation of Section 506 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.A. § 506 . It charges that the licensee of radio station WAAF, located in Chicago, Illinois, for several years to on or about May 28, 1946, employed…”
Gremio de Prensa, Radio, Teatro y Television v. Voice of Puerto Rico Inc., 121 F. Supp. 63 (D.P.R. 1954). “Even if the Lea Act, also known as the Petrillo Act, adopted April 16, 1946, as an amendment to The Communications Act of 1934, Title 47 U.S.C.A. § 506 (a-d), which appears to be more likely in point with the present controversy, were invoked by defendant in support of its…”
F. & A. Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co., 98 F. Supp. 180 (S.D. Cal. 1951). “Section 506(a) (1), 47 U.S.C.A. § 506 (a) (1). . United States v.”
— 47 U.S.C. § 506(a) — 1 case
United States v. Kemble, 198 F.2d 889 (3rd Cir. 1952). “When Congress wished to prevent that sort of coercion in the Lea Act (which has to do with “Coercive practices affecting broadcasting; * * * ”) it carefully so stated, 47 U.S. C.A. § 506(a) (1), (2), (3), (4), and made a violation punishable by imprisonment for not more than one…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.