U.S. Code » Title 49 » Subtitle SUBTITLE VII— AVIATION PROGRAMS › Part PART A— AIR COMMERCE AND SAFETY › Subpart subpart i— general › Chapter CHAPTER 401— GENERAL PROVISIONS

49 U.S.C. § 101

AVIATION DISASTER RELIEF.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)In General.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President shall take the following actions to compensate air carriers for losses incurred by the air carriers as a result of the terrorist attacks on the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001:“[(1) Repealed. Pub. L. 110–161, div. D, title I, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1974.]“(2) Compensate air carriers in an aggregate amount equal to $5,000,000,000 for—“(A) direct losses incurred beginning on September 11, 2001, by air carriers as a result of any Federal ground stop order issued by the Secretary of Transportation or any subsequent order which continues or renews such a stoppage; and“(B) the incremental losses incurred beginning September 11, 2001, and ending December 31, 2001, by air carriers as a direct result of such attacks.“(b)Emergency Designation.—Congress designates the amount of new budget authority and outlays in all fiscal years resulting from this title as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(e)). Such amount shall be available only to the extent that a request, that includes designation of such amount as an emergency requirement as defined in such Act [see Short Title note set out under section 900 of Title 2, The Congress], is transmitted by the President to Congress.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1930–2026 · leading case: U.S. Bank v. Lindsey, 920 N.E.2d 515 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
U.S. Bank v. Lindsey, 920 N.E.2d 515 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “l contends that it was entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict because: (1) Lindsey was immune from liability for his negligence by operation of the Workers’ Compensation Act and, therefore, Carmichael could not be vicariously liable for decedent’s injury and death; (2)…”
Monumental Task Comm., Inc. v. Foxx, 157 F. Supp. 3d 573 (E.D. La. 2016). “Federal Statutory Claims In the first, category of claims, Plaintiffs assert causes of action for violations of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.) National Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.”
Cnty. of Bergen v. Dole, 620 F. Supp. 1009 (D.N.J. 1985). · cites it 2× “3, Item 24) DEIS United States Department of Interior DOI Department of Transportation Act of 1966, 49 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. DOTA Executive Order 11988, 42 Fed.”
Save Our Illinois Land v. Illinois Com. Comm'n, 2022 IL App (4th) 210008 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “Discrimination Between Common Carriers ¶ 100 The objectors accused the carriers of violating, or of participating in violating, sections 8-101 and 15-401(h) of the Act (220 ILCS 5/8-101, 15-401(h) (West 2020)) and the Interstate Commerce Act ( 49 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (2018)) by…”
Sondergaard v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 65 A.3d 994 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013). “…license or a commercial driver learner’s permit.” 75 Pa.C.S. § 1603. . Act of 1999, P.L. 106-159, 133 Stat. 1748 , 49 U.S.C. §§ 101 , et seq.”
Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass'n v. Bower, 757 N.E.2d 627 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “In 1991, Congress enacted the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ( 49 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (1994)) (the Act).”
Automated Donut Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp., 424 N.E.2d 265 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981). · cites it 2× “One of the most hotly contested issues at trial was whether the machinery had been properly braced in the trailer before it was placed on Conrail’s flat (piggy back) car.”
G & B Aircraft Mgmt. v. Smoot (In Re Utah Aircraft All.), 342 B.R. 327 (10th Cir. BAP 2006). “When first enacted, these sections were designated as different section numbers. Technical amendments to the Act renumbered the sections, but have not altered the content of the registration provisions.”
Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. Texas Mexican Ry. Co., 263 F.2d 791 (5th Cir. 1959). · cites it 2× “Holding as it does, that except where the property carried is perishable property and the damage claimed is the result of inherent vice, plaintiff makes out a prima facie case by the introduction of a good order bill of lading, it states the law exactly as we have stated it…”
Jean C. Graham v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc., 314 F.3d 7 (1st Cir. 2000). “803 (1995), to be codified at 49 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. 3 . It is common, in the motor carrier industry for carriers to lease tractor-trailers from other parties and hire drivers as independent contractors, on an as-needed basis, rather than maintain a permanent fleet of…”
The Dublin Co. v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 417 F.2d 777 (5th Cir. 1969). · cites it 2× “" Plaintiff Dublin argues that the phrase contained in 49 U.S.C.A. § 101 , “if such statement be true,” referring to “S L & C”, places the burden on the carrier of establishing by competent evidence that the goods were loaded by the shipper.”
Hyer v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 957 A.2d 807 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008). “1748 , 49 U.S.C. § 101 , this is a new offense found at 49 CFR § 385.”
Show all 64 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.