49 U.S.C. § 1321
Powers
2015—Pub. L. 114–110 renumbered section 721 of this title as this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1961–2026 · leading case: Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Flotill Prods., Inc., 389 U.S. 179 (1967).
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Flotill Prods., Inc., 389 U.S. 179 (1967). “§ 2031 (Atomic Energy Commission); 49 U. S. C. § 1321 (c) (Civil Aeronautics Board); 47 U.”
Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., E. Air Lines, Inc., Intervenor, 379 F.2d 453 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “Under the notation practice the views and votes of the members of a regulatory agency may be recorded separately rather than in joint session, and circulated to the remaining members for their attention.”
Wenninger v. United States, 234 F. Supp. 499 (D. Del. 1964). “See also 49 U.S.C. § 1321 (a) (1); 8 Am.Jur. 2d, Aviation § 10.”
Daniel Henry Arney & Charles H. Baker v. United States of Am., 479 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1973). “See note following 49 U.S.C. § 1321 . 4 . There are no provisions in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the state practice of filing “declarations under penalty of perjury” in lieu of affidavits.”
Archie Brown v. United States, 334 F.2d 488 (9th Cir. 1964). “§ 78 (d) ; 49 U.S.C. § 1321 ; and 49 U.S.C. § 11 . The fact that a high percentage would discharge their duties without favoritism is to no avail.”
Assure Competitive Transp., Inc. v. United States, 629 F.2d 467 (7th Cir. 1980). “, Civil Aeronautics Board, 49 U.S.C. § 1321 (c) (three of five); Federal Communications Commission, 47 U.”
S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United States, 433 F.2d 1373 (Ct. Cl. 1970). “§ 151 (1934); Civil Aeronautics Board, 49 U.S.C. § 1321 (1958); Interstate Commerce Commission, 49 U.”
Timm, 223 Ct. Cl. 639 (Ct. Cl. 1980). “49 U.S.C. § 1321 (a)(2) (1976). The letter indicated also that the hearing would be conducted in the office of the counsel to the President.”
Grand Trunk Corp. v. STB (7th Cir. 2025). “The carriers urge that this aspect of the Rule exceeds the Board’s ancillary powers conferred in its enabling statute, 49 U.S.C. § 1321 . Resolving this question is compli- cated by the Board’s failure in the Final Rule to rely expressly on its statutory authority under §…”
Winninger v. United States, 234 F. Supp. 499 (D. Del. 1964). “See also 49 U.S.C. § 1321 (a) (1); 8 Am.Jur.2d, Aviation § 10.”
United States v. McHugh (D.D.C. 2022). “either House of Congress, a joint committee of the two Houses, or a committee or a subcommittee of either House”); 49 U.S.C. §§ 1321–23 (creating procedures for “a proceeding before” the Surface Transportation Board).”
In Re Demaree Reed (Tex. 2026). “See 49 U.S.C. § 1321 . But as we explain above, the Board’s powers are tied to its statutory mandate to carry out the provisions of ICCTA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.