49 U.S.C. § 321
Definitions
In this subchapter, “aeronautics”, “air commerce”, and “air navigation facility” have the same meanings given those terms in section 40102(a) of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases, 1942–1999 · leading case: Mittelstadt v. Rouzer, 328 N.W.2d 467 (Neb. 1982).
Mittelstadt v. Rouzer, 328 N.W.2d 467 (Neb. 1982). “This agent had been appointed to conform to the requirements of the Motor Carrier Act, 49 U.S.C. § 321 (c) (1976) (now 49 U.S.C.”
Frank Ocepek Frank Ocepek as Statutory Tr. for Best MacHines Invented, Inc. v. Corp. Transp., Inc., 950 F.2d 556 (8th Cir. 1992). “§ 10330 (b) was sufficient to justify the District Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant. Both state and federal courts have regularly upheld personal jurisdiction when service is made upon an agent designated pursuant to this statute or its predecessor, 49 U.”
Mary M. Knowlton v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., & Schick Movers, Inc., 900 F.2d 1196 (8th Cir. 1990). “1946) (action in an Ohio federal court against a Kentucky corporation; the plaintiff was from Illinois, and the accident occurred in Georgia; jurisdiction over the person upheld because the corporation had appointed an agent in Ohio pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 321 (c), predecessor…”
State v. Plantation Pipe Line Co., 89 So. 2d 549 (Ala. 1956). “564 , 49 U.S.C. § 321 (c) (1940), 49 U.S.C.A. § 321 (c), it also designated a person in New Haven upon whom process might be served.”
Hirsch v. Nat'l Van Lines, Inc., 666 P.2d 49 (Ariz. 1983). “In Madden, supra, the Court stated the following when considering the interaction between state rules of process and 49 U.S.C. § 321 (c) (now codified at 49 U.”
Trailer Exp., Inc. v. Gammill, 403 So. 2d 1292 (Miss. 1981). “Section 321(c) in part reads: "(c) Every motor carrier * * * shall also file with the board of each State in which it operates and with the Interstate Commerce Commission a designation in writing of the name and postoffice address of a person in such State upon whom process…”
A. W. Stickle & Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 128 F.2d 155 (10th Cir. 1942). “221(c) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 321 (c), reads as follows: "Every motor carrier shall also file with the board of each State in which it operates a designation in writing of the name and post-office address of a person in such State upon whom process issued…”
De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., 514 F. Supp. 68 (C.D. Ill. 1981). “s, and duties of the Secretary of Commerce and any other offices and officers of the Department of Commerce under— (б) the following provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act as amended— (d) to the extent they relate to private carriers of property by motor vehicle and carriers…”
Rounds v. Rea, 947 F. Supp. 78 (W.D.N.Y. 1996). “49 U.S.C. § 321 (c). This section was recodified in 1978 and provides as follows: A motor carrier or broker providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the *83 Commission under subchapter II of chapter 105 of this title, including a motor carrier or broker operating…”
McKamey v. Vander Houten, 744 A.2d 529 (Del. Super. Ct. 1999). “Prior to being § 10330, it was 49 U.S.C. § 321 (c). 6 . Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises, Inc.”
Madden v. Truckaway Corp., 46 F. Supp. 702 (D. Minnesota 1942). “This portion of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 321 (c) reads: “Designation of agent for service of process.”
Scott v. Se. Greyhound Lines, 5 F.R.D. 11 (N.D. Ohio 1945). “, from its station there to the Ohio River; and that in compliance with the Motor Carrier Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 321 (c), it has designated an agent in Ohio for the service of process.”
— 49 U.S.C. § 321(c) — 2 cases
Wynne v. Queen City Coach Co., 49 F. Supp. 103 (D.N.J. 1943).
Ayers v. Gentry, 34 F.R.D. 477 (E.D. Tenn. 1963).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.