49 U.S.C. § 401
SHORT TITLE.
“This title may be cited as the ‘September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 134
cases, 1934–1999 · leading case: People v. W. Air Lines, Inc., 268 P.2d 723 (Cal. 1954).
People v. W. Air Lines, Inc., 268 P.2d 723 (Cal. 1954). “977, 49 U.S.C. § 401 et seq.), and is against the national interest.”
Chicago & S. Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103 (1948). “49 U.S.C. § 401 (20). All air carriers by similar procedures must obtain from the Board certificates *106 of convenience and necessity by showing a public interest in establishment of the route and the applicant's ability to serve it.”
United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946). “973 , 49 U.S.C. § 401 . Under those statutes the United States has "complete and exclusive national sovereignty in the air space" over this country.”
Gardner v. Allegheny Cnty., 114 A.2d 491 (Pa. 1955). “973 , 49 U.S.C. § 401 , diminish the absolute rights that landowners had to the space above the surface of their land under the common law, they do not authorize the flight of aircraft at such low altitudes as to interfere with the reasonable use and enjoyment of land.”
Laird v. Nelms, 406 U.S. 797 (1972). “973 , 49 U. S. C. § 401 , said: "It is ancient doctrine that at common law ownership of the land extended to the periphery of the universe Cujus est solum ejus est usque ad coelum.”
Polish Nat'l All. of the United States v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 322 U.S. 643 (1944). “973 , 977, 49 U.S.C. § 401 (3); Federal Employers' Liability Act, § 1, as amended, 53 Stat.”
North Am. Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 240 F.2d 867 (D.C. Cir. 1957). “977 (1938), as amended, 49 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (1952). All references herein, except as otherwise indicated, are to the United States Code, 1952 edition.”
United States v. a & P Trucking Co., 358 U.S. 121 (1958). “979 , 49 U. S. C. § 401 (27); Federal Communications Act, 48 Stat.”
Rosenhan v. United States, 131 F.2d 932 (10th Cir. 1942). “977 , 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 401 et seq., 621) for violations of Section 610(a) (1) of the Act, 49 U.”
S. S. W., Inc. v. Air Transp. Ass'n of Am., 191 F.2d 658 (D.C. Cir. 1951). “’ ” The District Court denied relief on the ground that the complaint raised matters which “the Civil Aeronautics Act [ 49 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq.] was passed to correct” and which fall, therefore, within the primary jurisdiction of the Civil Aeronautics Board.”
Civil Aeronautics Bd. v. State Airlines, Inc., 338 U.S. 572 (1950). “973 , 49 U. S. C. § 401 et seq. [2] The several opinions of the Board are reported.”
W. R. Grace & Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 154 F.2d 271 (2d Cir. 1946). “Per contra, it is said that § 1(2) of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 401 (2), defines an "air carrier" to mean "any citizen of the United States who undertakes, whether directly or indirectly or by a lease or any other arrangement, to engage in air transportation.”
— 49 U.S.C. § 401(4) — 1 case
Clark v. Lone Star Life Ins. Co., 347 S.W.2d 290 (Tex. App. 1961).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.