5 U.S.C. § 5103
Determination of applicability
The Office of Personnel Management shall determine finally the applicability of section 5102 of this title to specific positions and employees, except for positions and employees in the Office of the Architect of the Capitol.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1973–2005 · leading case: Weslie C. Haneke v. Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 535 F.2d 1291 (D.C. Cir. 1976).
Weslie C. Haneke v. Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 535 F.2d 1291 (D.C. Cir. 1976). “If jurisdiction is under the APA, a question might be raised whether 5 U.S.C. § 5103 (1970), which provides: “The Civil Service Commission shall determine finally the applicability of section 5102 of this title to specific positions and employees,” brings the classification…”
Paralyzed Vets. of Am. v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 345 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2003). “159 are on their face arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to various statutory provisions, including 5 U.S.C. §§ 5103 (b) and 5103A. 1 We hold that the regulation codified at 38 C.”
Anderson v. United States, 64 Fed. Cl. 759 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “See 5 U.S.C. § 5103 . Compensation for each classification was set by statute.”
Abell v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 207 (Ct. Cl. 1975). “labor management agreements entered into by the following agencies in the Department of the Interior: Alaska Kailroad Bonneville Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Bureau of Mines Bureau of Beclamation The Comptroller General solicited the opinion of the…”
Brech v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 362 F. Supp. 914 (S.D.N.Y. 1973). “5 U.S.C. §§ 5103 , 5112. That mandate, in the “purpose” section, contains a directive that “the principle of equal pay for substantially equal work will be followed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.