5 U.S.C. § 5536
Extra pay for extra services prohibited
An employee or a member of a uniformed service whose pay or allowance is fixed by statute or regulation may not receive additional pay or allowance for the disbursement of public money or for any other service or duty, unless specifically authorized by law and the appropriation therefor specifically states that it is for the additional pay or allowance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1971–2018 · leading case: William O. Schism & Robert Reinlie v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
William O. Schism & Robert Reinlie v. United States, 316 F.3d 1259 (Fed. Cir. 2002). “§ 70 (1946) (now codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. § 5536 (2000), § 70 at the time relevant to this case) concerns the receipt of any pay, extra allowance, or other compensation by a federal employee in exchange for any service in addition to his fixed salary, pay; or emoluments:…”
Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, 707 F.2d 524 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “2d at 617 (emphasis in original) (quoting statutory predecessor of 5 U.S.C. § 5536 ). 63 . Mullett’s Adm’x v.”
United States Dep't of Navy v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 665 F.3d 1339 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “at 4-103 (“In addition to the obvious reason that food is a personal expense and government salaries are presumed adequate to enable employees to eat regularly, furnishing free food might violate 5 U.S.C. § 5536 , which prohibits an employee from receiving compensation in…”
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 370 F.3d 1214 (D.C. Cir. 2004). “” Alternatively, FLRA concluded that Provision 2 reimbursements are prohibited by 5 U.S.C. § 5536 , which bars payment to a federal employee of “additional pay or allowance” beyond that fixed by law for the service or duty.”
Miller v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 903 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir. 2018). “See 5 U.S.C. § 5536 . However, pursuant to 5 U.”
Crowley v. Muskie, 496 F. Supp. 360 (D.D.C. 1980). “Defendants’ Objections Defendants object to portions of the Special Master’s findings on four grounds, to wit: (1) that the recommended retroactive promotion, back pay, and money damage relief is barred by the doctrine of immunity, (2) that the recommended order of monetary…”
United States v. St. Regis Paper Co., 328 F. Supp. 660 (W.D. Wis. 1971). “Without intending to express any view on whether it may apply to claims for informer fees by other public officials, I note that 5 U.S.C. § 5536 , which prohibits extra pay for extra services, applies only to government “employees.”
Rate of Accrual of Annual Leave by a Civilian Emp. Appointed While on Terminal Leave Pending Ret. From One of the Uniformed Servs. (OLC 2007). “As a general matter, a member of a uniformed service “whose pay or allowance is fixed by statute or regulation may not receive additional pay or allowance for the disbursement of public money or for any other service or duty, unless specifi- cally authorized by law,” 5 U.S.C. §…”
US Dep't of the Navy v. FLRA (D.C. Cir. 2012). “at 4-103 (“In addition to the obvious reason that food is a personal expense and government salaries are presumed adequate to enable employees to eat regularly, furnishing free food might violate 5 U.S.C. § 5536 , which prohibits an employee from receiving compensation in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.