Notes of Decisions
Cited in
227
cases (
42 in the last 5 years), 1967–2026 · leading case:
Brown v. Perez, 835 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2016).
Brown v. Perez, 835 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2016).
“See Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, (“FECA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 8102 (a), 8103(a), 8133. The relevant federal workers compensation program is administered by the OWC, a subdivision of the Department of Labor.”
Franklin v. Potter, 600 F. Supp. 2d 38 (D.D.C. 2009).
“at 868 (citing 5 U.S.C. § 8102 , 39 U.S.C. § 1005 (c), and 20 C.”
Patricia Wise v. Robert Wilkie, Sec'y, 955 F.3d 430 (5th Cir. 2020).
“5 U.S.C.A. § 8102 (a). The Secretary of Labor through his designee, the Director of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, administers and implements the Act.”
Tippetts v. United States, 308 F.3d 1091 (10th Cir. 2002).
· cites it 2× “Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress The Federal Employees’ Compensation Act is a workers’ compensation plan for federal government employees. 20 C.F.R. § 10.”
Gill v. United States, 471 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” 2 5 U.S.C. § 8102 (a). Liability under FECA is “exclusive and instead of all other liability of the United States .”
Max Leroy McDaniel v. United States, 970 F.2d 194 (6th Cir. 1992).
· cites it 2× “” 5 U.S.C. § 8102 . To the extent that the term is potentially relevant here, the definition of an “injury” is more specifically limited to “injury by accident” or by “a disease proximately caused by the employment.”
White v. United States, 143 F.3d 232 (5th Cir. 1998).
· cites it 2× “” 5 U.S.C. § 8102 (a). For injuries within its coverage, FECA’s remedy is exclusive of any other remedy, including the FTCA.”
Newman v. Dist. of Columbia, 518 A.2d 698 (D.C. 1986).
· cites it 2× “2 (1981) (Merit Personnel Act) with 5 U.S.C. § 8102 (1982) (FECA). The Merit Personnel Act and FECA also contain an identical provision excluding certain common law remedies against the government for disabilities within the compensation scheme.”
— 5 U.S.C. § 8102(a) — 3 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.