5 U.S.C. § 913
Omitted]
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1953–1998 · leading case: Amell v. United States, 384 U.S. 158 (1966).
Amell v. United States, 384 U.S. 158 (1966). “295 , 5 U. S. C. § 913 (1964 ed.), provides: "Employees whose basic rate of compensation is fixed on an annual or monthly basis and adjusted from time to time in accordance with prevailing rates by wage boards or similar administrative authority serving the same purpose shall be…”
Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Dir., Off. of Sci. & Tech., 448 F.2d 1067 (D.C. Cir. 1971). “Section 133z-15 has been replaced by 5 U.S.C. § 913 (Supp. V, 1970). . The statutory basis for the SST program is a provision in the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 authorizing the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency to undertake research and development in aviation.”
Abramson v. United States, 40 Fed. Cl. 204 (Fed. Cl. 1998). “§ 913 , which provided: Employees whose basic rate of compensation is fixed on an annual or monthly basis and adjusted from time to time in accordance with prevailing rates by wage boards or similar administrative authority serving the same purpose shall be entitled to overtime…”
Panama Canal Co. v. Spencer M. Anderson, & Arthur Morgan, 312 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1963). “” 5 U.S.C.A. § 913 . . “Employees of the Transportation Corps of the Army of the United States on vessels operated by the United States, vessel employees of the.”
Abbott v. United States, 112 F. Supp. 801 (Ct. Cl. 1953). “295 , 5 U.S.C.A. § 913 , and the Classification Act of 1949, 5 U.”
Abbott v. United States, 151 F. Supp. 929 (Ct. Cl. 1957). “297 , 5 U.S.C.A. § 913 . At the present stage of the case, only the question of liability will be decided.”
Anderson v. Panama Canal Co., 194 F. Supp. 765 (D.C.Z. 1961). “296 , 297, 5 U.S.C. § 913 , 5 U.S.C.A. § 913 and are not therefore included in the Thomas Amendment because their basic rate of pay is on an hourly basis instead of an “annual or monthly” basis is fallacious as that act was adopted to implement the provisions of the Thomas…”
Boyd v. Panama Canal Co., 160 F. Supp. 50 (D.C.Z. 1958). “It is the opinion of this Court that Section 205 (formerly Section 203, 5 U.S.C.A. § 913 ) of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945, 59 Stat.”
Hubert M. Biggs v. United States, 287 F.2d 908 (Ct. Cl. 1961). “Plaintiffs seek to recover overtime pay, as provided for by 5 U.S.C.A. § 913 , for the one hour travel time from Concord back to Mare Island after the close of the normal workday.”
Biggs v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 545 (Ct. Cl. 1961). “Plaintiffs seek to recover overtime pay, as provided for by 5 U.S.C. § 913 (1958 Ed.), for the one hour travel time from Concord back to Mare Island after the close of the normal workday.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.